Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Toserba Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Objective Weighting-TOPSIS (OWH-TOPSIS)


  • Ade Adyatna Izka * Mail Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
  • Heni Sulistiani Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: Objective Weighting; OWH-TOPSIS; Election; Decision Support System; Supplier

Abstract

Convenience store suppliers are important partners in the retail supply chain, responsible for providing a wide range of daily necessities, from groceries to household items, directly to retailers or convenience store owners. The problem in the research on selecting the best convenience store supplier lies in the complexity of evaluating and balancing various criteria that affect supplier performance. Each supplier has different advantages and disadvantages in terms of product quality, price, delivery time, product availability, flexibility in ordering, and payment terms. The main challenge in this study is to determine the right weight for each criterion so that the selection decision can reflect the strategic needs of the convenience store objectively and accurately. The Objective Weighting-TOPSIS (OWH-TOPSIS) method is a modification of the TOPSIS method that combines an objective weighting approach to objectively determine the weight of the criteria. OWH-TOPSIS is an approach in a decision support system that combines objective weighting with the TOPSIS method to effectively assess and prioritize alternatives. The results of the supplier assessment ranking show that Supplier 3 and Supplier 7 are in the top position with very close preference scores, namely 0.9462 and 0.946 respectively, indicating that they are both the best choices based on the set criteria. Followed by Supplier 5 and Supplier 13 with identical scores of 0.9253, showing excellent performance but slightly below the top two suppliers. Supplier 1 is in fifth position with a score of 0.913, still in the very good category but slightly behind compared to the top four suppliers. This ranking provides a clear picture of each supplier's relative ranking in terms of meeting the evaluation criteria.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

G. M. Magableh, “An integrated model for rice supplier selection strategies and a comparative analysis of fuzzy multicriteria decision-making approaches based on the fuzzy entropy weight method for evaluating rice suppliers,” PLoS One, vol. 19, no. 4, p. e0301930, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301930.

T. G. Hawkins, M. J. Gravier, and W. A. Muir, “The role of supplier performance evaluations in mitigating risk: Assessing evaluation processes and behaviors,” Ind. Mark. Manag., vol. 87, pp. 2–17, 2020.

F. Al Khadzik, B. Huda, E. Novalia, and S. S. Hilabi, “Sistem Pemilihan Supplier Obat Menerapkan Metode Additive Ratio Analysis (ARAS),” J. Sist. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 620–625, 2024, doi: 10.30865/json.v5i3.7499.

S. Fatimah and T. Ardiansah, “Kombinasi Metode MOORA dan Rank Order Centroid dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Produk Sepatu,” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 28–38, 2024, doi: 10.30865/klik.v5i1.1856.

Faisal Amir, Pressa Persana Surya Saputra, Jasmir, Samsul Lutfi, Ni Luh Wiwik Sri Rahayu Ginantra, and Ilham Tri Maulana, “Penerapan Metode Metode Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assesment (WASPAS) dalam Pemilihan Supplier,” J. Informatics Manag. Inf. Technol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 18–23, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.47065/jimat.v3i1.241.

A. Raynaldi, A. Ikhwan, and M. D. Irawan, “Implementasi AHP Dan Promethee Dalam Pemilihan Bengkel Resmi Terbaik Di Deli Serdang,” J-SISKO TECH (Jurnal Teknol. Sist. Inf. dan Sist. Komput. TGD), vol. 6, no. 2, p. 687, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.53513/jsk.v6i2.8363.

A. Iskandar, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelayakan Penerima Bantuan Dana KIP Kuliah Menggunakan Metode ROC-EDAS,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2 SE-Articles, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i2.2265.

Y. N. Mukhandi, K. Suhada, and R. Gunawan, “Perancangan Aplikasi Penerimaan Calon Peserta Didik Baru Dengan Menggunakan Desain Thinking Pada SMK Perbankan Indonesia,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Inov. dan Adopsi Teknol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 170–181, 2022, doi: 10.35969/inotek.v2i1.248.

S. Zhang, R. Wang, and Z. Lin, “Subzone division optimization with probability analysis-based K-means clustering for coupled control of non-uniform thermal environments and individual thermal preferences,” Build. Environ., vol. 249, p. 111155, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.111155.

M. Faulah, I. Irawati, and E. I. Alwi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Guru Honorer Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product,” Bul. Sist. Inf. dan Teknol. Islam, vol. 4, no. 4, 2023.

W. Triharseno, W. M. P. Dhuhita, and A. Priadana, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Programer Software House Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” J. PILAR Teknol. J. Ilm. Ilmu Ilmu Tek., vol. 5, no. 1, 2020.

A. R. Mishra, P. Rani, F. Cavallaro, I. M. Hezam, and J. Lakshmi, “An Integrated Intuitionistic Fuzzy Closeness Coefficient-Based OCRA Method for Sustainable Urban Transportation Options Selection,” Axioms, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 144, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/axioms12020144.

I. Azhari, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Kepala Gudang Di Pt. Central Mandiri Cemerlang (CMC) Dengan Kombinasi Metode Roc Dan Aras,” Inf. dan Teknol. Ilm., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 37–48, 2023.

H. Sulistiani, S. Setiawansyah, A. F. O. Pasaribu, P. Palupiningsih, K. Anwar, and V. H. Saputra, “New TOPSIS: Modification of the TOPSIS Method for Objective Determination of Weighting,” Int. J. Intell. Eng. Syst., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 991–1003, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.22266/ijies2024.1031.74.

A. Hidayat and T. Aspiranti, “Analisis Pemilihan Pemasok dengan Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) untuk Komoditas Brokoli di Distribution Center Toserba Yogya,” Pros. Manaj., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 279–283, 2020, doi: 10.29313/.v6i1.20080.

S. Proboningrum and Acihmah Sidauruk, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN SUPPLIER KAIN DENGAN METODE MOORA,” JSiI (Jurnal Sist. Informasi), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 43–48, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.30656/jsii.v8i1.3073.

E. Felicia and M. Badrul, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN SUPPLIER TERBAIK MENGGUNAKAN METODE SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING,” J. Ilm. Inform., vol. 10, no. 02, pp. 107–111, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.33884/jif.v10i02.6277.

R. Haris Andri and D. Permana Sitanggang, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan (SPK) Pemilihan Supplier Terbaik Dengan Metode MOORA,” J. Sains Inform. Terap., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 79–84, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.62357/jsit.v2i3.181.

H. Sulistiani, Setiawansyah, P. Palupiningsih, F. Hamidy, P. L. Sari, and Y. Khairunnisa, “Employee Performance Evaluation Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) with PIPRECIA-S Weighting: A Case Study in Education Institution,” in 2023 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Informations System (ICIMCIS), 2023, pp. 369–373. doi: 10.1109/ICIMCIS60089.2023.10349017.

Setiawansyah, A. A. Aldino, P. Palupiningsih, G. F. Laxmi, E. D. Mega, and I. Septiana, “Determining Best Graduates Using TOPSIS with Surrogate Weighting Procedures Approach,” in 2023 International Conference on Networking, Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology (IConNECT), 2023, pp. 60–64. doi: 10.1109/IConNECT56593.2023.10327119.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Toserba Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Objective Weighting-TOPSIS (OWH-TOPSIS)

Dimensions Badge
Article History
Submitted: 2024-09-04
Published: 2024-10-14
Abstract View: 512 times
PDF Download: 276 times
How to Cite
Izka, A., & Sulistiani, H. (2024). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Toserba Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Objective Weighting-TOPSIS (OWH-TOPSIS). Journal of Information System Research (JOSH), 6(1), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.47065/josh.v6i1.5889
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)