Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Terbaik Menggunakan Kombinasi Metode Pembobotan CRITIC dan COPRAS


  • Rudi Sugianto Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
  • Heni Sulistiani * Mail Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: COPRAS; CRITIC; Best Teacher; Election; Combination

Abstract

Teachers play a crucial role in shaping the future of the younger generation. They not only impart knowledge and skills, but also guide, inspire, and support students in the learning process and personal development. Selecting the best teachers involves a thorough assessment of the prospective teachers' academic qualifications, teaching experience, and communication skills. The main problem in selecting the best teachers often involves several significant challenges, namely the evaluation of teachers' skills and performance is often influenced by subjective assessments, which can result in uncertainty and bias in the selection process. The combination of the CRITIC and COPRAS weighting methods offers a robust and comprehensive approach to multi-criteria decision-making. This combination overall improves the reliability of decisions by providing a structured and comprehensive method, thus aiding in making more informative and rational choices. The results of the ranking of the best teacher, Dra. Sudarningsih received the highest score of 100, making him the best teacher in this ranking. In second place, Sri Astuti, S.Pd scored 96.64, followed by Drs. M. Jusriadi with a score of 95.54 in third place. Rita Ratna Sari, SP ranked fourth with a score of 95.45, while Misriyati, S.Pd was in fifth place with a score of 94.74. This ranking reflects an objective assessment based on the criteria that have been set, where Dr. Sudarningsih shows the best performance among the teachers evaluated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

H. Sulistiani, Setiawansyah, P. Palupiningsih, F. Hamidy, P. L. Sari, and Y. Khairunnisa, “Employee Performance Evaluation Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) with PIPRECIA-S Weighting: A Case Study in Education Institution,” in 2023 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Informations System (ICIMCIS), 2023, pp. 369–373. doi: 10.1109/ICIMCIS60089.2023.10349017.

Setiawansyah, A. A. Aldino, P. Palupiningsih, G. F. Laxmi, E. D. Mega, and I. Septiana, “Determining Best Graduates Using TOPSIS with Surrogate Weighting Procedures Approach,” in 2023 International Conference on Networking, Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology (IConNECT), 2023, pp. 60–64. doi: 10.1109/IConNECT56593.2023.10327119.

M. MARUF and K. ÖZDEMİR, “Ranking of Tourism Web Sites According to Service Performance Criteria with CRITIC and MAIRCA Methods: The Case of Turkey,” Uluslararası Yönetim Akad. Derg., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1108–1117, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.33712/mana.1352560.

F. Psarommatis and D. Kiritsis, “A hybrid Decision Support System for automating decision making in the event of defects in the era of Zero Defect Manufacturing,” J. Ind. Inf. Integr., vol. 26, p. 100263, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2021.100263.

G. M. Magableh, “An integrated model for rice supplier selection strategies and a comparative analysis of fuzzy multicriteria decision-making approaches based on the fuzzy entropy weight method for evaluating rice suppliers,” PLoS One, vol. 19, no. 4, p. e0301930, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301930.

Ö. Deretarla, B. Erdebilli, and M. Gündoğan, “An integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process and Complex Proportional Assessment for vendor selection in supply chain management,” Decis. Anal. J., vol. 6, p. 100155, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.dajour.2022.100155.

A. Pramuditya, D. Darwis, and S. Setiawansyah, “Kombinasi Logarithmic Percentage Change-Driven Objective Weighting dan Complex Proportional Assessment Dalam Penentuan Supplier Perlengkapan Olahraga,” J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 660–669, 2024, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v5i3.5160.

P. Rani et al., “Hesitant Fuzzy SWARA-Complex Proportional Assessment Approach for Sustainable Supplier Selection (HF-SWARA-COPRAS),” Symmetry (Basel)., vol. 12, no. 7, p. 1152, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.3390/sym12071152.

H. Yuan, X. Ma, Z. Cheng, and T. Kari, “Dynamic Comprehensive Evaluation of a 660 MW Ultra-Supercritical Coal-Fired Unit Based on Improved Criteria Importance through Inter-Criteria Correlation and Entropy Weight Method,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 7, p. 1765, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.3390/en17071765.

H. Zhao, C. Lu, and Y. Zhang, “Optimal site selection for wind-photovoltaic-complemented storage power plants based on Geographic Information System and Grey Relational Analysis-Group Criteria Importance Through Inter Criteria Correlation-Interactive and Multicriteria Decision Making: ,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 92, p. 112148, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.est.2024.112148.

M. N. D. Satria, S. Setiawansyah, and M. Mesran, “Combination of CRITIC Weighting Method and Multi-Attribute Utility Theory in Network Vendor Selection,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 188–197, 2024, doi: 10.47065/bits.v6i1.5342.

L. Zhang, Q. Cheng, and S. Qu, “Evaluation of Railway Transportation Performance Based on CRITIC-Relative Entropy Method in China,” J. Adv. Transp., vol. 2023, pp. 1–11, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1155/2023/5257482.

I. Mukhametzyanov, “Specific character of objective methods for determining weights of criteria in MCDM problems: Entropy, CRITIC and SD,” Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 76–105, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.31181/dmame210402076i.

B. Ayan, S. Abacıoğlu, and M. P. Basilio, “A Comprehensive Review of the Novel Weighting Methods for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making,” Information, vol. 14, no. 5, p. 285, May 2023, doi: 10.3390/info14050285.

R. Y. Simanullang and M. Mesran, “Penerapan Metode Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) dengan Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid (ROC) Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Terbaik,” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 466–475, 2023, doi: 10.30865/klik.v3i5.733.

N. D. Apriani, N. Krisnawati, and Y. Fitrisari, “Implementasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dengan Metode SAW Dalam Pemilihan Guru Terbaik,” J. Autom. Comput. Inf. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 37–45, May 2021, doi: 10.47134/jacis.v1i1.5.

H. Dafitri, N. Wulan, and H. Ritonga, “Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Terbaik Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS dan WASPAS,” JURIKOM (Jurnal Ris. Komputer), vol. 9, no. 5, p. 1313, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.30865/jurikom.v9i5.4816.

M. D. S. Rahardjo, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Berprestasi Menerapkan Metode AHP dan MOORA,” Resolusi Rekayasa Tek. Inform. dan Inf., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 467–475, 2024, doi: 10.30865/resolusi.v4i5.1896.

H. Sulistiani, S. Setiawansyah, A. F. O. Pasaribu, P. Palupiningsih, K. Anwar, and V. H. Saputra, “New TOPSIS: Modification of the TOPSIS Method for Objective Determination of Weighting,” Int. J. Intell. Eng. Syst., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 991–1003, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.22266/ijies2024.1031.74.

M. W. Arshad, S. Setiawansyah, Y. Rahmanto, P. Palupiningsih, and S. Maryana, “Modification of Multi-Attribute Utility Theory in Determining Scholarship Recipient Students,” BEES Bull. Electr. Electron. Eng., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 10–19, 2024, doi: 10.47065/bees.v5i1.5523.

M. W. Arshad, S. Sintaro, Y. Rahmanto, A. Wantoro, and S. Setiawansyah, “Optimization of Alternative Assessment with Modified MOORA Method: Case Study of Contract Employee Selection,” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 3099–3107, 2024, doi: 10.30865/klik.v4i6.1891.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Terbaik Menggunakan Kombinasi Metode Pembobotan CRITIC dan COPRAS

Dimensions Badge
Article History
Submitted: 2024-08-23
Published: 2024-10-14
Abstract View: 595 times
PDF Download: 343 times
How to Cite
Sugianto, R., & Sulistiani, H. (2024). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Terbaik Menggunakan Kombinasi Metode Pembobotan CRITIC dan COPRAS. Journal of Information System Research (JOSH), 6(1), 164-175. https://doi.org/10.47065/josh.v6i1.5841
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)