Analisa Perbandingan Metode MAUT dan Metode TOPSIS Dengan Menggunakan Pembobotan ROC Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Calon Kepala Desa
- Ahmad Rifqi Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia
-
Rima Tamara Aldisa
*
Universitas Nasional, Jakarta,
Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study aims to carry out a comparative analysis process between the MAUT method and the TOPSIS method using ROC weighting. The MAUT method functions to deal with problems in decision making that link several interrelated attributes, in which the method combines the decision maker's preferences for the relevant attributes by giving a weight value to each attribute. Meanwhile, the TOPSIS method is used to select the best alternative from the many choices based on their relative distances from the ideal solution. In this study, weighting using the ROC method is used to objectively determine attribute weight values. The results of the research conducted show that the MAUT Method and the TOPSIS Method with ROC weighting can give good results in determining village heads. The results of the ranking using the MAUT method are A4 with a value of 0.950. while the ranking results using the TOPSIS method are A4 with a value of 0.917.
Downloads
References
F. Kaunan, Y. P. K. Kelen, and D. Nababan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Calon Kepala Desa Menggunakan Metode Analityc Hierarchy Process ( AHP ) Berbasis Web ( Studi Kasus : Desa Oesena ),” vol. 2, pp. 375–387, 2023.
R. Y. Simanullang, M. Melisa, and M. Mesran, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Bantuan Covid-19 Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” TIN Terap. Inform. Nusant., vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 451–458, 2021.
W. Apriani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Pimpinan Dengan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) di PT. Sagami Indonesia,” J. mantik, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 10–20, 2019.
W. S. Wardana, V. Sihombing, D. Irmayani, and U. Labuhanbatu, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Lokasi Usaha Kuliner,” vol. 4, pp. 151–157, 2021.
W. W. Lakry Maltaf Putra, “Penerapan Metode Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS),” Intisari, vol. 1, no. 531408058, pp. 416–425, 2023, doi: 10.30865/mib.v7i1.5530.
F. Aditiya, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Calon Peserta Cerdas Cermat Tingkat SMA Menerapkan Metode ROC dan WP,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14–20, 2022.
J. Nasution and M. Syahrizal, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekomendasi Calon Kepala Puskesmas Mengunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (Maut) (Studi Kasus: Puskesmas Desa Lama Sei Lepan),” KOMIK (Konferensi Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 176–182, 2019, doi: 10.30865/komik.v3i1.1586.
N. Nurlela, M. Syahrizal, F. Fadlina, and A. Karim, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Kepala Desa Terbaik Menerapkan Metodethe Extended Promethee II (EXPROM II),” J. Sist. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 1, no. 3, p. 200, 2020, doi: 10.30865/json.v1i3.2151.
R. Y. Simanullang and M. Mesran, “Penerapan Metode Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) dengan Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid (ROC) Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Terbaik,” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 466–475, 2023.
I. Hidayatulloh and M. Z. Naf’an, “Metode Moora Dengan Pendekatan Price-Quality Ratio Untuk Rekomendasi Pemilihan Smartphone,” J. SINTAK, pp. 62–68, 2017.
S. Susmanto, M. Munawir, E. Erdiwansyah, Z. Zulfan, and D. Setiyadi, “Perancangan E-Voting pemilihan Kepala Desa untuk Transparansi Informasi di Kecamatan Lueng Bata Kota Banda Aceh,” J. Serambi Eng., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 2833–2840, 2022, doi: 10.32672/jse.v7i1.3926.
S. Sihombing and A. M. H. Sihite, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Kepala Desa Terbaik Di Kecamatan Batang Kuis Menggunakan Metode MOORA,” vol. 6, no. November, pp. 151–158, 2022, doi: 10.30865/komik.v6i1.5757.
Y. Yusman et al., “Analisa Penggunaan Metode AHP Untuk Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Pemilihan Calon Kepala Desa di Klambir Lima,” Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 612–614, 2022, doi: 10.30865/komik.v6i1.5767.
I. I. Ramadani, P. Pristiwanto, and Y. Hasan, “Kombinasi Metode ROC dan Metode MAUT dalam Pemilihan Guru pada Madrasah Ibtidaiyah,” Bull. Data Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2022.
M. I. Fikri, E. Haerani, I. Afrianty, and S. Ramadhani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Guru Menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory ( MAUT ),” vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1271–1280, 2022, doi: 10.30865/jurikom.v9i5.4791.
T. Susilowati, A. Nazar, S. Mukodimah, M. Idris, and F. Satria, “Sistem pendukung keputusan penilaian kinerja guru sekolah dasar kecamatan gunung alip menggunakan metode topsis,” J. TAM (Technology Accept. Model., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 36–42, 2018.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Analisa Perbandingan Metode MAUT dan Metode TOPSIS Dengan Menggunakan Pembobotan ROC Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Calon Kepala Desa
Pages: 1413-1422
Copyright (c) 2023 Rima Tamara Aldisa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
