Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penulis Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dan Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS)


  • Putri Mandarani Institut Teknologi Padang, Padang, Indonesia
  • Haula Luthfia Ramadhan * Mail Institut Teknologi Padang, Padang, Indonesia
  • Eva Yulianti Institut Teknologi Padang, Padang, Indonesia
  • Anna Syahrani Institut Teknologi Padang, Padang, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: EDAS; Criteria; Contest Participants; ROC; DSS

Abstract

CV Jejak Publisher is a publishing company who has actively held writing competitions. However, there is a problem that occurs in the assessment process that has been running. The problem is several participants get the same value of the final score which makes it difficult for the jury to determine the order of winners. Therefore, to get a fairer and clearer result, need a calculation method that can support the jury's decision for determining the winners. This study aims to design a decision support system by applying the ROC and EDAS methods. ROC is used to assign a weighted value to each of the criteria set by  CV Jejak Publisher, while EDAS is used to assess and rank the data of the participants. This system has output is the rank and final score of the participants from the highest to the lowest score. As a result, the ROC and EDAS methods were successfully applied to the system, as evidenced by 110 input data and all of them were successfully ranked by the system. The highest average score is 88.4 with the highest score based on 5 scoring criteria, namely 422. Thus, this system can be used to assist the jury in making a decision on the winner.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

T. Limbong et al., Sistem Pendukung Keputusan: Metode & Implementasi. Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2020.

H. A. Septilia and S. Styawati, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Dana Bantuan Menggunakan Metode AHP,” J. Teknol. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 34–41, 2020.

D. R. Sari, A. P. Windarto, D. Hartama, and S. Solikhun, “Decision Support System for Thesis Graduation Recommendation Using AHP-TOPSIS Method,” J. Teknol. dan Sist. Komput., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2018, doi: 10.14710/jtsiskom.6.1.2018.1-6.

U. Mawaddah and M. Fauzi, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN UNTUK MENENTUKAN DOSIS OBAT PADA ANAK MENGGUNAKAN METODE FORWARD CHAINING (Studi Kasus Di Klinik Dokter Umum Karanggayam - Srengat),” Antivirus J. Ilm. Tek. Inform., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2018, doi: 10.35457/antivirus.v12i1.440.

R. Umar, A. Fadlil, and Y. Yuminah, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dengan Metode AHP untuk Penilaian Kompetensi Soft Skill Karyawan,” Khazanah Inform. J. Ilmu Komput. dan Inform., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 27, 2018, doi: 10.23917/khif.v4i1.5978.

A. Kumar et al., “A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 69, no. June 2016, pp. 596–609, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.191.

D. Sabaei, J. Erkoyuncu, and R. Roy, “A review of multi-criteria decision making methods for enhanced maintenance delivery,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 37, pp. 30–35, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.08.086.

R. G. García-Cáceres, Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis – Matching (SMAA-M), vol. 7. 2020.

N. Astiani, D. Andreswari, and Y. Setiawan, “Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Tanaman Obat Herbal Untuk Berbagai Penyakit Dengan Metode Roc (Rank Order Centroid) Dan Metode Oreste Berbasis Mobile Web,” J. Inform., vol. 12, no. 2, 2016, doi: 10.21460/inf.2016.122.486.

L. Handayani, M. Syahrizal, and K. Tampubolon, “Pemilihan Kepling Teladan Menerapkan Metode Rank Order Centroid (Roc) Dan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (Aras) Di Kecamatan Medan Area,” KOMIK (Konferensi Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 532–538, 2019, doi: 10.30865/komik.v3i1.1638.

M. Mesran, J. Afriany, and S. H. Sahir, “Efektifitas Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Dalam Peningkatan Motivasi Kerja Menerapkan Metode Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dan Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS),” Pros. Semin. Nas. Ris. Inf. Sci., vol. 1, no. September, p. 813, 2019, doi: 10.30645/senaris.v1i0.88.

M. Mesran, T. M. Diansyah, and F. Fadlina, “Implemententasi Metode Rank Order Cendroid (ROC) dan Operational Competitiveness Rating Analysis (OCRA) dalam Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Komputer Menerapkan (Studi Kasus: STMIK Budi Darma),” Pros. Semin. Nas. Ris. Inf. Sci., vol. 1, no. September, p. 822, 2019, doi: 10.30645/senaris.v1i0.89.

M. Badaruddin, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Menerapkan Kombinasi Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dengan Rank Order Centroid (ROC),” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 3, no. 4, p. 366, 2019, doi: 10.30865/mib.v3i4.1508.

P. Fitriani and T. S. Alasi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dengan Metode WASPAS, COPRAS, dan EDAS: Menentukan Judul Skripsi,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1051–1061, 2020.

D. M. Midyanti, R. Hidyati, S. Bahri, and U. T. Pontianak, “Rumah Di Kota Pontianak,” vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 119–124, 2019.

M. K. Ghorabaee et al., “Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS),” Inform., vol. 26, no. September, pp. 435–451, 2019, doi: 10.30645/senaris.v1i0.89.

R. Safitri and I. Firdaus, “SPK Rekomendasi Pekerjaan Dengan Metode EDAS (Studi Kasus: Lembaga Kursus dan Pelatihan Komputer Widya Informatika Selat Panjang),” J. Inf. Komput. Log., vol. 1, no. 4, 2020.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penulis Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dan Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS)

Dimensions Badge
Article History
Submitted: 2022-07-11
Published: 2022-07-31
Abstract View: 1092 times
PDF Download: 1030 times
How to Cite
Mandarani, P., Ramadhan, H., Yulianti, E., & Syahrani, A. (2022). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penulis Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dan Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS). Journal of Information System Research (JOSH), 3(4), 686-694. https://doi.org/10.47065/josh.v3i4.1845
Issue
Section
Articles