Hybrid Entropy and CRADIS Method Approach in Decision Support System for Selecting the Best Employees


  • Junhai Wang Zhejiang Technical Institute of Economics, Zhejiang, China
  • Setiawansyah Setiawansyah * Mail Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
  • Very Hendra Saputra Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: CRADIS Method; Hybrid MCDM; Entropy; Employee Selection; Decision Support System

Abstract

Selecting the right employees is a key factor in improving organizational performance and productivity. However, in many organizations, the employee selection process is still conducted through manual assessments and subjective judgments, which may lead to bias and inconsistent decisions. Therefore, a systematic and objective approach is needed to support the evaluation process. This study integrates the Entropy method and the CRADIS method within a decision support system to determine the best employee candidates. The Entropy method is applied to calculate objective criteria weights based on the variation of information in the data, while the CRADIS method is used to rank candidates according to their proximity to the ideal solution and distance from the anti-ideal solution. The integration of these two methods provides a framework that reduces subjectivity in determining criterion importance and produces more discriminative ranking results. The findings indicate that candidate GF achieved the highest score of 0.6848, followed by EY with 0.6835 and AR with 0.6528, showing that these candidates have performance profiles closest to the defined criteria. In addition, sensitivity analysis using several scenarios of criteria weight changes demonstrates that the proposed model is relatively stable, with an overall ranking consistency of 81.8%, while alternatives AR, DI, and FR show 100% ranking stability. These results indicate that the Entropy–CRADIS approach can improve the accuracy, objectivity, and reliability of employee selection decisions in multi-criteria decision-making environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Anwarsyah and G. Triyono, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Rumah Sakit Menggunakan Metode Multi Factor Evaluation Process,” J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 454–466, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v5i2.4778.

Bella Maitasari and Ahmad Farisi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Maut,” SATESI J. Sains Teknol. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 17–23, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.54259/satesi.v4i1.2554.

W. I. Safitri, M. Mesran, and S. Sarwandi, “Penerapan Metode Preference Selection Index (PSI) Dalam Penerimaan Staff IT,” Bull. Informatics Data Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 1, May 2022, doi: 10.61944/bids.v1i1.1.

J. Wang, A. R. Isnain, R. R. Suryono, Y. Rahmanto, M. Mesran, and S. Setiawansyah, “Decision Support System for Platform Selection in E-Commerce Using the OWH-TOPSIS Method,” J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 172–181, 2024, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v6i1.5990.

S. H. Hadad, I. Chandra, J. Wang, D. A. Megawaty, S. Setiawansyah, and A. Yudhistira, “Dynamic Weight Allocation In Modified Multi-Atributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis With Symmetry Point For Real-Time Decision Support ,” J. Tek. Inform., vol. 6, no. 1 SE-Articles, pp. 63–74, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.52436/1.jutif.2025.6.1.4170.

Y. Rahmanto, J. Wang, S. Setiawansyah, A. Yudhistira, D. Darwis, and R. R. Suryono, “Optimizing Employee Admission Selection Using G2M Weighting and MOORA Method,” Paradig. - J. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 27, no. 1 SE-, pp. 1–10, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.31294/p.v27i1.8224.

J. Wang, S. Setiawansyah, and Y. Rahmanto, “Decision Support System for Choosing the Best Shipping Service for E-Commerce Using the SAW and CRITIC Methods,” J. Ilm. Inform. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 101–109, 2024, doi: 10.58602/jima-ilkom.v3i2.32.

J. Wang, D. Darwis, R. D. Gunawan, and F. Ariany, “Optimizing E-Commerce Platform Selection Using Root Assessment Method and MEREC Weighting,” J. Inform. dan Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak, vol. 6, no. 1 SE-Articles, pp. 1–12, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.33365/jatika.v6i1.6.

Z. Li, Y. Wang, J. Xie, Y. Cheng, and L. Shi, “Hybrid multi-criteria decision-making evaluation of multiple renewable energy systems considering the hysteresis band principle,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 49, pp. 450–462, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.09.059.

J. Fu, H. Wang, X. Sun, H. Bao, X. Wang, and J. Liu, “Multi-objective optimization for impeller structure parameters of fuel cell air compressor using linear-based boosting model and reference vector guided evolutionary algorithm,” Appl. Energy, vol. 363, p. 123057, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123057.

A. Puška, A. Štilić, and I. Stojanović, “Approach for multi-criteria ranking of Balkan countries based on the index of economic freedom,” J. Decis. Anal. Intell. Comput., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–14, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.31181/jdaic10017022023p.

D. T. Do, “Assessing the Impact of Criterion Weights on the Ranking of the Top Ten Universities in Vietnam,” Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 14, no. 4 SE-, pp. 14899–14903, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.48084/etasr.7607.

G. S. de Assis, M. dos Santos, and M. P. Basilio, “Use of the WASPAS Method to Select Suitable Helicopters for Aerial Activity Carried Out by the Military Police of the State of Rio de Janeiro,” Axioms, vol. 12, no. 1. 2023. doi: 10.3390/axioms12010077.

K. Gao, T. Liu, Y. Rong, V. Simic, H. Garg, and T. Senapati, “A novel BWM-entropy-COPRAS group decision framework with spherical fuzzy information for digital supply chain partner selection,” Complex Intell. Syst., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 6983–7008, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s40747-024-01500-5.

F. Ulum, J. Wang, S. Setiawansyah, and R. Aryanti, “Selection of the Best E-Commerce Platform Based on User Ratings using a Combination Entropy and SAW Methods,” Bull. Informatics Data Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 44–53, 2024.

D. D. Trung, N. T. P. Giang, D. Van Duc, T. Van Dua, and H. X. Thinh, “The Use of SAW, RAM and PIV Decision Methods in Determining the Optimal Choice of Materials for the Manufacture of Screw Gearbox Acceleration Boxes,” Int. J. Mech. Eng. Robot. Res., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 338–347, 2024, doi: 10.18178/ijmerr.13.3.338-347.

R. R. Oprasto, J. Wang, A. F. O. Pasaribu, S. Setiawansyah, R. Aryanti, and Sumanto, “An Entropy-Assisted COBRA Framework to Support Complex Bounded Rationality in Employee Recruitment,” Bull. Comput. Sci. Res., vol. 5, no. 3 SE-, pp. 207–218, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.47065/bulletincsr.v5i3.505.

V. Starčević, V. Petrović, I. Mirović, L. Ž. Tanasić, Ž. Stević, and J. Đurović Todorović, “A Novel Integrated PCA-DEA-IMF SWARA-CRADIS Model for Evaluating the Impact of FDI on the Sustainability of the Economic System,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 20. 2022. doi: 10.3390/su142013587.

K. Qiu, J. Chen, S. Ashraf, and T. Shahid, “Strategic Decision Support System With Probabilistic Linguistic Term Sets: Extended CRADIS Approach for Supply Chain Risk Management in Sports Industry,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 32853–32862, 2025, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3416391.

S. Ashraf, W. Iqbal, M. S. Hameed, V. Simic, and N. Bacanin, “An enhanced CRADIS decision model for optimizing radioactive waste reduction through transmutations based on Disc Spherical Fuzzy information,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 167, p. 112289, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112289.

A. Çilek and O. Şeyranlıoğlu, “Measuring the Financial Performance of Reinsurance Companies in Türkiye with LODECI, CRADIS and AROMAN MCDM Methods TT - LODECI, CRADIS ve AROMAN,” Int. J. Bus. Econ. Stud., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2025, doi: 10.54821/uiecd.1587675.

F. F. Altıntaş, “Analysis of the Prosperity Performances of G7 Countries: An Application of the LOPCOW-based CRADIS Method,” Alphanumeric J., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 157–182, 2023, doi: 10.17093/alphanumeric.1360478.

A. Puška, D. Božanić, Z. Mastilo, and D. Pamučar, “Extension of MEREC-CRADIS methods with double normalization-case study selection of electric cars,” Soft Comput., vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 7097–7113, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00500-023-08054-7.

D. A. Megaraty, H. Sulistiani, Setiawansyah, A. Qurania, Y. Yadin, and R. Oktaviani, “Integration Method Based on the Removal Effects of Criteria Weighting and MOORA Method: Wi-Fi Router Selection Case Study,” in 2024 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Information System (ICIMCIS), 2024, pp. 241–246. doi: 10.1109/ICIMCIS63449.2024.10956545.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Hybrid Entropy and CRADIS Method Approach in Decision Support System for Selecting the Best Employees

Dimensions Badge
Article History
Submitted: 2025-12-19
Published: 2026-03-23
Abstract View: 93 times
PDF Download: 46 times
How to Cite
Wang, J., Setiawansyah, S., & Saputra, V. (2026). Hybrid Entropy and CRADIS Method Approach in Decision Support System for Selecting the Best Employees. Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS), 7(4), 2657-2668. https://doi.org/10.47065/bits.v7i4.8985
Issue
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>