Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Tenaga Honor Panitia Pengawas Menggunakan Kombinasi Logarithmic Least Squares Weighting dan MABAC
- Ferdian Jerry Mahendra Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
-
Setiawansyah Setiawansyah
*
Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia, Bandar Lampung,
Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The performance of the honor staff, supervisory committee, division, staff handling violations, dispute resolution is vital in ensuring effectiveness and fairness in handling violations and dispute resolution within the organization. The main problems in evaluating the performance of supervisory committee personnel include subjectivity in the assessment, and lack of transparency in the appraisal process. Subjectivity can arise due to different perceptions of the party making the assessment, which can lead to unfairness in performance evaluation. Non-transparency in the appraisal process can also raise doubts and distrust of the fairness of the performance appraisal process of supervisory staff. DSS performance appraisal of honorary personnel of the supervisory committee using a combination of LLSW and MABAC is to develop a holistic and effective approach in evaluating the performance of honorary personnel in the supervisory committee. This research is to improve objectivity and fairness in performance appraisal, as well as enable decision makers to make more informed and informed decisions in honorary personnel management in the supervisory committee. The combination of LLSW (Logarithmic Least Squares Weighting) and MABAC (Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison) can obtain more detailed and objective recommendations in the performance assessment of honor personnel. This process combines a statistical approach (LLSW) to determine attribute weights and a multi-attribute comparative analysis (MABAC) to obtain a final alternative ranking. The results of ranking 3 alternatives using a combination of LLSW and MABAC methods in assessing the performance of honor workers showed that the results for rank 1 were obtained by Yustina with a final function value of 0.152406, rank 2 was obtained by Andri with a final function value of 0.118662, and rank 3 was obtained by Sudrajat with a final function value of 0.094245.
Downloads
References
R. Dora, “Analisa Peran Tenaga Honorer Terhadap Efektivitas Tugas Aparatur Sipil Negara,” J. Adm. Polit. Dan Sos., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 8–15, 2020.
H. Sulistiani, Setiawansyah, P. Palupiningsih, F. Hamidy, P. L. Sari, and Y. Khairunnisa, “Employee Performance Evaluation Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) with PIPRECIA-S Weighting: A Case Study in Education Institution,” in 2023 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Informations System (ICIMCIS), 2023, pp. 369–373. doi: 10.1109/ICIMCIS60089.2023.10349017.
S. Kucuksari, D. Pamucar, M. Deveci, N. Erdogan, and D. Delen, “A new rough ordinal priority-based decision support system for purchasing electric vehicles,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 647, p. 119443, 2023.
F. Psarommatis and D. Kiritsis, “A hybrid Decision Support System for automating decision making in the event of defects in the era of Zero Defect Manufacturing,” J. Ind. Inf. Integr., vol. 26, p. 100263, 2022.
M. Kayacık, H. Dinçer, and S. Yüksel, “Using quantum spherical fuzzy decision support system as a novel sustainability index approach for analyzing industries listed in the stock exchange,” Borsa Istanbul Rev., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1145–1157, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.bir.2022.10.001.
M. W. Arshad, S. Setiawansyah, and S. Sintaro, “Comparative Analysis of the Combination of MOORA and GRA with PIPRECIA Weighting in the Selection of Warehouse Heads,” BEES Bull. Electr. Electron. Eng., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 112–122, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.47065/bees.v4i3.4922.
S. Setiawansyah, S. Sintaro, V. H. Saputra, and A. A. Aldino, “Combination of Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) and Simplified Pivot Pairwise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment (PIPRECIA-S) in Determining the Best Staff,” Bull. Informatics Data Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 57, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.61944/bids.v2i2.67.
R. R. Purba, M. Mesran, M. T. A. Zaen, S. Setiawansyah, D. Siregar, and E. W. Ambarsari, “Decision Support System in the Best Selection Coffee Shop with TOPSIS Method,” IJICS (International J. Informatics Comput. Sci., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 28–34, 2023.
R. Torres-Sanchez, H. Navarro-Hellin, A. Guillamon-Frutos, R. San-Segundo, M. C. Ruiz-Abellón, and R. Domingo-Miguel, “A decision support system for irrigation management: Analysis and implementation of different learning techniques,” Water, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 548, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020548.
E. P. Sarabi and S. A. Darestani, “Developing a decision support system for logistics service provider selection employing fuzzy MULTIMOORA & BWM in mining equipment manufacturing,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 98, p. 106849, 2021.
M. Mathew, R. K. Chakrabortty, M. J. Ryan, M. F. Ljaz, and S. A. R. Khan, “The Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (Mabac) Method for Decision Making under Interval-Valued Fermatean Fuzzy Environment for Green Supplier Selection,” 2021.
P. Wang, J. Wang, G. Wei, C. Wei, and Y. Wei, “The multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) for multiple attribute group decision making under 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic environment,” Informatica, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 799–818, 2019.
A. R. Mishra, A. K. Garg, H. Purwar, P. Rana, H. Liao, and A. Mardani, “An Extended Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison Approach for Smartphone Selection Using Discrimination Measures,” Informatica, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 119–143, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.15388/20-INFOR430.
S. B. Atim, “Penerapan Metode Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison Dalam Rekomendasi Pemilihan Mobil Second,” J. Inf. Technol. Softw. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 99–110, 2024, doi: 10.58602/itsecs.v2i2.111.
S. Sintaro, “Penerapan Rank Reciprocal dan Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison Untuk Penentuan Lokasi Cafe Baru,” J. Artif. Intell. Technol. Inf., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 26–37, 2024.
L. Csató, “A characterization of the Logarithmic Least Squares Method,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 276, no. 1, pp. 212–216, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.12.046.
E. Khanmohammadi, B. Malmir, H. Safari, and M. Zandieh, “A new approach to strategic objectives ranking based on fuzzy logarithmic least squares method and fuzzy similarity technique,” Oper. Res. Perspect., vol. 6, p. 100122, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.orp.2019.100122.
P. Klęsk, “Logarithmic Least Squares criterion revisited for general matrices of pairwise comparisons,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 192, pp. 148–157, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.016.
S. Bozóki and V. Tsyganok, “The (logarithmic) least squares optimality of the arithmetic (geometric) mean of weight vectors calculated from all spanning trees for incomplete additive (multiplicative) pairwise comparison matrices,” Int. J. Gen. Syst., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 362–381, May 2019, doi: 10.1080/03081079.2019.1585432.
P. Wu, H. Li, L. Zhou, and H. Chen, “Consistency analysis and priority weights of multiplicative trapezoidal fuzzy preference relations based on multiplicative consistency and logarithmic least square model,” J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 8317–8334, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.3233/JIFS-190846.
Y. Laia, M. Mesran, I. G. I. Sudipa, D. S. Putra, P. Rosyani, and R. Aryanti, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Tenaga Honorer Menerapkan Metode Weighted Product (WP) dan Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) dengan Kombinasi Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid (ROC),” Bull. Informatics Data Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 19, May 2023, doi: 10.61944/bids.v2i1.60.
A. Septian and I. A. Susila, “Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Rekomendasi Pengangkatan CPNS Tenaga Honorer Puslitbang Polri Menggunakan Metode SAW Berbasis Desktop (PUSLITBANG POLRI),” Sci. Sacra J. Sains, Teknol. dan Masy., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 357–365, 2022.
A. Surahman, “Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Menggunakan Kombinasi Metode Multi-Objective Optimization by Ratio Analysis (MOORA) dan Pembobotan Entropy,” Chain J. Comput. Technol. Comput. Eng. Informatics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 28–36, 2024.
A. Alfiarini and S. Hamidani, “Penilaian Kinerja Tenaga Kerja Sukarela Menggunakan Pembobotan AHP dan MOORA,” J. Sist. Inf. dan Sist. Komput., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2024.
J.-S. Lin and K.-H. Chen, “A Novel Decision Support System Based on Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning: Towards Zero-Defect Manufacturing in Injection Molding,” J. Ind. Inf. Integr., p. 100621, 2024.
D. Spoladore, M. Tosi, and E. C. Lorenzini, “Ontology-based decision support systems for diabetes nutrition therapy: A systematic literature review,” Artif. Intell. Med., p. 102859, 2024.
S. Sintaro and S. Setiawansyah, “Kombinasi Multi-Objective Optimization on the basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) dan PIPRECIA dalam Seleksi Penerimaan Barista,” J. Ilm. Inform. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 13–23, 2024, doi: 10.58602/jima-ilkom.v3i1.23.
M. N. D. Satria, “Application of SAW in the Class Leader Selection Decision Support System,” Chain J. Comput. Technol. Comput. Eng. Informatics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 27–31, 2023.
S. H. Hadad, A. R Metha, S. Setiawansyah, and H. Sulistiani, “Evaluation of Salesperson Performance in the Sales Allowance Decision Support System Using the MARCOS and PIPRECIA Methods,” J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 477–486, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v5i2.4863.
D. Pamucar and S. Biswas, “A Novel Hybrid Decision Making Framework for Comparing Market Performance of Metaverse Crypto Assets,” Decis. Mak. Adv., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 49–62, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.31181/dma1120238.
P. Liu and D. Wang, “A 2-dimensional uncertain linguistic MABAC method for multiattribute group decision-making problems,” Complex Intell. Syst., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 349–360, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40747-021-00372-3.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Tenaga Honor Panitia Pengawas Menggunakan Kombinasi Logarithmic Least Squares Weighting dan MABAC
Pages: 636-647
Copyright (c) 2024 Ferdian Jerry Mahendra, Setiawansyah Setiawansyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
