Kombinasi Penerapan Metode WASPAS dan Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dalam Keputusan Pemilihan Teknologi Kamera Ponsel Terbaik


  • Badrul Anwar Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
  • Wakhinuddin Simatupang Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
  • Mukhlidi Muskhir Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
  • Dedy Irfan Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
  • Asyahri Hadi Nasyuha * Mail STMIK Triguna Dharma, Medan, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: DSS; ROC; WASPAS; Mobile Camera

Abstract

Smartphone camera technology is currently growing rapidly so that it has specifications that support it so that the results obtained are almost on par with the quality of digital cameras. Supported cellphone cameras can be used in learning photography, not necessarily with a digital camera. The increasing number of cellphone choices makes users who want to study photography confused in choosing a cellphone that has the best cellphone camera technology. So that a Decision Support System was applied in this study as a system for obtaining the best cellphone camera technology decisions. In making the right decision on selecting the best cellphone camera technology, it must meet the criteria for Number of Camera Features, Number of Main Cameras, Number of Front Cameras, Main Camera Resolution, Front camera Resolution, Optical Zoom and Quality of Video Recording. Therefore a Decision Support System is needed to solve the problem by applying the ROC (Rank Order Centroid) and WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment) methods which can produce weight and preference values from the first ranking alternative. So that the selection of the best mobile camera technology for the best mobile camera technology can be found in table 7, namely the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra which is in the A5 alternative with the highest score of 3.8354 as the first rank

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

H. H. Mintana, “PEMBUATAN KARYA 11 TEKNIK DASAR FOTOGRAFI DENGAN MEMAKSIMALKAN FITUR KAMERA PADA HANDPHONE,” no. 1.

E. Widodo, “PELATIHAN FOTOGRAFI DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN KAMERA PONSEL PADA KELOMPOK SADAR WISATA, TANJUNG LESUNG, BANTEN,” no. 27, pp. 396–405, 2019.

R. M. Simanjorang, H. D. Hutahaean, H. T. Sihotang, and T. Informatika, “Sistem pendukung keputusan penentuan penerima bahan pangan bersubsidi untuk keluarga miskin dengan metode ahp pada kantor kelurahan mangga,” J. Inform. Pelita Nusant., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 22–31, 2017.

M. H. Renaldy, S. Kom, M. Kom, G. Syahputra, S. Kom, and M. Kom, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Pemilihan Nasabah Terbaik Pada PT . BPR NBP 33 Galang Lubuk Pakam Menggunakan Metode Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality ( ELECTRE ),” no. x, 2020.

S. Salimian, S. M. Mousavi, and J. Antuchevičienė, “Evaluation of Infrastructure Projects By a Decision Model Based on Rpr, Mabac, and Waspas Methods With Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets,” Int. J. Strateg. Prop. Manag., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 106–118, 2022, doi: 10.3846/ijspm.2022.16476.

A. Zulfandi, “Penerapan Kombinasi Metode Entropy dan Extended Promethee II Dalam Menentukan Kepala Jurusan Pada SMK,” J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 26–56, 2021, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v3i1.821.

K. Terbaik et al., “Uji Sensitivitas Metode Pembobotan ROC , SWARA Terhadap Kriteria,” vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 532–540, 2022, doi: 10.47065/josh.v3i4.1952.

M. I. Fikri, E. Haerani, I. Afrianty, and S. Ramadhani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Guru Menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory ( MAUT ),” vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1271–1280, 2022, doi: 10.30865/jurikom.v9i5.4791.

V. Thiagarasu and R. Dharmarajan, “A Primer on the TOPSIS-DMSS Technique with Entropy Method,” Int. J. Nov. Res. Comput. Sci. Softw. Eng., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 46–62, 2015.

I. G. I. Sudipa, H. Wijaya, and R. J. Rumandan, “Penerapan Multi-Attribute Decision Making Menggunakan Metode WASPAS Pada Pemilihan Benih Sayuran,” vol. 4, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.47065/josh.v4i1.2368.

E. Setiawan and S. Wibisono, “SPK Pemilihan Perguruan Tinggi Komputer Kota Semarang Dengan Metode WASPAS,” vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 153–161, 2022.

E. K. Manik, D. R. Manalu, and J. M. Hutapea, “Perancangan Sistem Informasi Pendaftaran Dan Seleksi Penerimaan Calon Siswa Baru Dengan Metode Waspas ( Studi Kasus : SMP Negeri 1 Tigalingga ),” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 28–36, 2022.

K. Munthe, T. R. A. Syahputra, A. A. Pasuli, and M. A. Hasibuan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Pegawai Honorer Kelurahan Medan Sinembah Menerapkan Metode ROC dan MOORA,” vol. 1, no. 1, 2022.

P. Simanjuntak and R. D. Sianturi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerima Dokter Dirumah Sakit Umum Bhakti Dengan Menerapkan Metode Oreste Dan ROC,” vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 121–127, 2022.

Desipriani, Suprianingsih, and M. Fahzurrahman, “PELATIHAN BEAUTY SHOT PHOTOGRAPHY DENGAN KAMERA HANDPHONE PADA MURID TATARIAS PENGANTINDI LKP LELLY MEDAN MARELAN,” vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 141–150, 2022.

S. N. Asia and M. Yusuf, “Jurnal Mantik Selection Of Employee Recruitment Based On Priority Sequence Level Assessment Using ROC Method,” vol. 6, no. 3, 2022.

Haviluddin, E. Budiman, and N. Amin, “A Model of Non-ASN Employee Performance Assessment Based on the ROC and MOORA Methods,” vol. 5, no. 158, pp. 315–321, 2022.

F. T. Waruwu and M. Mesran, “Comparative Analysis of Ranking Methods of WASPAS+ROC with Preference Selection Index (PSI) in Determining the Performance of Young Lecturers,” IJISTECH (International J. Inf. Syst. Technol., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 207–214, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://ijistech.org/ijistech/index.php/ijistech/article/view/136

A. Iskandar, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelayakan Penerima Bantuan Dana KIP Kuliah Menggunakan Metode ROC-EDAS,” vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 856–864, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i2.2265.

V. No, M. Badaruddin, and M. Lasena, “DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM OF EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT APPLYING COMBINATION SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING ( SAW ) METHOD WITH RANK ORDER CENTROID ( ROC ),” vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 37–42, 2021.

A. P. Nanda and E. Y. Anggraeni, “Comparison of MAUT Method with WASPAS Method in IBN Lecturer Performance Assessment,” no. 05, pp. 1–18, 2022.

Y. Dorfeshan and S. M. Mousavi, “A novel interval type-2 fuzzy decision model based on two new versions of relative preference relation-based MABAC and WASPAS methods (with an application in aircraft maintenance planning),” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 3367–3385, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00521-019-04184-y.

D. Menerapkan, M. Roc, D. Waspas, M. Faiz, Z. Amirillah, and M. Sianturi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Kerjasama Wedding Organizer,” vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 234–241, 2022.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Kombinasi Penerapan Metode WASPAS dan Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dalam Keputusan Pemilihan Teknologi Kamera Ponsel Terbaik

Dimensions Badge
Article History
Submitted: 2022-12-09
Published: 2022-12-30
Abstract View: 650 times
PDF Download: 581 times
How to Cite
Anwar, B., Simatupang, W., Muskhir, M., Irfan, D., & Nasyuha, A. (2022). Kombinasi Penerapan Metode WASPAS dan Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dalam Keputusan Pemilihan Teknologi Kamera Ponsel Terbaik. Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS), 4(3), 1431−1437. https://doi.org/10.47065/bits.v4i3.2655
Issue
Section
Articles