Penentuan Penerima Bantuan dengan Program Miskin Berprestasi Menggunakan Metode Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo)

Achmad Fikri Sallaby; Indra Kanedi; Venny Novita Sari; Rizka Tri Alinse; Reno Supardi

doi:10.47065/josyc.v5i3.5192

Achmad Fikri Sallaby * Universitas Dehasen, Bengkulu, Indonesia
Indra Kanedi Universitas Dehasen, Bengkulu, Indonesia
Venny Novita Sari Universitas Dehasen, Bengkulu, Indonesia
Rizka Tri Alinse Universitas Dehasen, Bengkulu, Indonesia
Reno Supardi Universitas Dehasen, Bengkulu, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47065/josyc.v5i3.5192

Keywords: Decision Support System; Combined Compromise Solution Method; Acceptance of Assistance

Abstract

Educational assistance programmes from the government and other parties allow people to focus on education without being burdened by costs. In Indonesia, various aid programmes are available, including Bidik Misi for new students and special programmes for active students in need. These programmes aim to help poor, high-achieving students continue their education. However, there are problems in the determination of aid recipients. Aid funds are often misused by some students for hedonistic lifestyles. This is due to a selection system that is not objective and is still influenced by "insider power". Assessments based on students' economic conditions and achievements are often ignored, and priority is given to students who have connections in related institutions. This practice contradicts the purpose of the educational assistance programme, which is supposed to help students with economic limitations. Therefore, this research uses a Decision Support System (SDM). This study involved 15 students as data samples and used 5 assessment criteria. The selection of data samples was carried out by applying the Combined Compromise Solution method, one of the methods in decision making. From the selection process, 3 students were selected who were entitled to receive assistance. They are Siti Humairoh with a final score of 2.5395, Hafid Bangko in second place with a score of 2.2353, and Syfa Zahra in third place with a score of 2.1629. The three students have fulfilled all the requirements and they can proceed to the initial data validation process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

J. Afriany, K. Tampubolon, and R. Fadillah, “Penerapan Metode TOPSIS Penentuan Pemberian Mikro Faedah Bank Syariah Indonesia (BSI),” TIN Terap. Inform. Nusant., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 129–137, 2021.

A. Triayudi, D. Nofrisa, and R. Fadillah, “Penerapan Metode EXPROM II Dalam Menentukan Tempat Wisata Pantai Terbaik,” vol. 5, pp. 337–346, 2023, doi: 10.30865/json.v5i2.6925.

R. Fadillah, A. N. Purnama, W. P. Mahardika, and M. Mesran, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Siaran Edukasi di Televisi Menggunakan Metode WASPAS (Weight Aggregated Sum Product Assesment),” JIKTEKS J. Ilmu Komput. dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 8–16, 2023.

A. A. Nasution, R. T. Aldisa, M. Mesran, and R. Fadillah, “Penerapan Metode Multi Objective Optimization on The Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) dalam Penentuan Pembimbing Skripsi Terbaik,” J. Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 614–620, 2024.

M. M. Saw, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Dosen Non Komputer Terbaik,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 30–36, 2023.

I. Alfansyah, J. Sibagariang, R. Fadillah, and D. Assarani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Dosen Non Komputer Terbaik Menerapkan Metode SAW,” J. Decis. Support Syst. Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 30–36, 2023.

M. Z. Lubis, R. Fadillah, and R. M. F. Lubis, “Decision Support System for Determining New Branch Locations Applying the Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) Method,” Int. J. Informatics Data Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 36–45, 2023.

M. Mesran, A. A. Kusuma, and R. M. F. Lubis, “Decision Support System for Determining New Branch Location Applying the MAUT Method with ROC Weighting,” Bull. Informatics Data Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 67–76, 2024.

R. A. Pratama and R. Hardianto, “Permanent Employee Assessment Decision Support System using the Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) Method,” J. Comput. Scine Inf. Technol., pp. 50–54, 2024.

S. Zega and M. Mesran, “Pharmacist Acceptance Decision Support System Applying AHP and COPRAS Methods,” Int. J. Informatics Data Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 26–35, 2023.

M. N. D. Satria, “Application of SAW in the Class Leader Selection Decision Support System,” Chain J. Comput. Technol. Comput. Eng. Informatics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 27–31, 2023.

A. Yusupa, J. Manullang, N. Marbun, and S. B. F. Ginting, “Decision support system for determining the best PAUD teacher using the MOORA method,” SAGA J. Technol. Inf. Syst., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 50–55, 2023.

R. Alfiansyah and I. Zufria, “Decision Support Systems for Career Recommendations for Graduates in Islamic Broadcasting Communication Studies Using ANP and TOPSIS Methods,” Int. J. Softw. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 474–486, 2023.

S. S. Issues, “Integrating Subjective – Objective Weights Consideration and,” 2023.

A. F. O. Pasaribu, A. A. Aldino, and A. Surahman, “Decision Support System for Determining the Best Internship Students Using the Combined Compromise Solution Method,” vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 607–618, 2024, doi: 10.47065/bits.v5i3.4231.

V. H. Saputra, T. Ardiansah, U. T. Indonesia, and U. T. Indonesia, “Penerapan Combined Compromise Solution ( CoCoSo ) Method Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Modem,” vol. 1, no. July, pp. 7–16, 2022.

A. Desa, M. Metode, and A. H. P. Dan, “Sistem pendukung keputusan penentuan penerima beasiswa anggaran desa menggunakan metode ahp dan moosra,” no. December 2022, 2023.

S. H. Hadad, D. Darwis, A. Qurania, A. A. Aldino, and A. R. Mehta, “Student Ranking Based on Learning Assessment Using the Simplified PIPRECIA Method and CoCoSo Method,” vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 30–39, 2023, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v5i1.4544.

D. K. Tripathi, S. K. Nigam, and P. Rani, “NEW INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY PARAMETRIC DIVERGENCE MEASURES AND SCORE FUNCTION-BASED COCOSO METHOD FOR DECISION-MAKING PROBLEMS,” vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 535–563, 2023.

J. Yu, H. Ding, Y. Yu, S. Wu, Q. Zeng, and Y. Xu, “Risk assessment of liquefied natural gas storage tank leakage using failure mode and effects analysis with Fermatean fuzzy sets and CoCoSo method,” vol. 154, no. May 2023, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111334.

K. K. Panchagnula, J. P. Sharma, K. Kalita, and S. Chakraborty, “CoCoSo method-based optimization of cryogenic drilling on multi-walled carbon nanotubes reinforced composites,” Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 279–297, 2023.

Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Penentuan Penerima Bantuan dengan Program Miskin Berprestasi Menggunakan Metode Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo)