Analisis Sensitivitas Metode AHP Dan TOPSIS Dalam Pemilihan Objek Wisata di Kabupaten Karangasem
-
I Gede Iwan Sudipa
*
Institut Bisnis dan Teknologi Indonesia, Denpasar,
Indonesia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4278-9068
- I Kadek Hardiatama Institut Bisnis dan Teknologi Indonesia, Denpasar, Indonesia
- Christina Purnama Yanti Institut Bisnis dan Teknologi Indonesia, Denpasar, Indonesia
- I Komang Arya Ganda Wiguna Institut Bisnis dan Teknologi Indonesia, Denpasar, Indonesia (*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Bali is a well-known tourist destination, but Karangasem is not widely known to the public. Tourist objects are selected as Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM). This study analyzes the MADM problem, namely the selection of tourist objects using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and The Technique for Order Preferences by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method. Method testing is done by conducting a sensitivity analysis to determine the most sensitive method in selecting tourist objects. The sensitivity analysis on 10 trials by changing the weight of the criteria by adding values from 1 to 2 shows that the AHP method produces a ranking change of 440 with a percentage of 5.6%. While the TOPSIS method has a ranking change of 292 with a percentage of 3.77%. The results show that the AHP method is more sensitive to changes in weight, so relevant decision-making in selecting Karangasem Regency tourism objects can be carried out using the AHP method.
Downloads
References
G. Lohmann and A. P. Netto, Tourism theory: Concepts, models and systems. Cabi, 2016.
S. I. K. Widyatmaja and I. G. Ngurah, “Pengetahuan Dasar Ilmu Pariwisata,” Pustaka Larasan, Bali, 2017.
N. L. Apriani, “Persepsi Wisatawan Terhadap Objek Daya Tarik Wisata Tenganan Pegringsingan, Kabupaten Karangasem.” Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 2020.
Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Karangasem, “Badan Pusat Statistika,” karangasemkab.bps.go.id, 2022.
P. T. Prasetyaningrum and A. Sari, “Penerapan Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp) Untuk Mendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Desrinasi Tempat Wisata Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Untuk Para Wisatawan Mancanegara Non Asia,” Simetris J. Tek. Mesin, Elektro dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 519–528, 2019.
E. P. Yuendini, I. N. Rachmi, N. N. Aini, R. Harini, and M. A. F. Alfana, “Analisis Potensi Ekonomi Sektor Pertanian dan Sektor Pariwisata di Provinsi Bali Menggunakan Teknik Analisis Regional,” J. Geogr. Media Inf. Pengemb. Dan Profesi Kegeografian, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 128–136, 2019.
A. Hidayah, S. Sunarti, and L. Hakim, “Potensi dan Pengembangan Objek Wisata Bahari Tulamben, Kabupaten Karangasem, Bali.” Brawijaya University, 2017.
D. R. Sari, A. P. Windarto, D. Hartama, and S. Solikhun, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Rekomendasi Kelulusan Sidang Skripsi Menggunakan Metode AHP-TOPSIS,” J. Teknol. dan Sist. Komput., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2018.
T. Limbong et al., Sistem Pendukung Keputusan: Metode & Implementasi. Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2020.
I. K. A. G. Wiguna, K. N. Semadi, I. G. I. Sudipa, and I. K. J. Septiawan, “Analisis Sensitivitas Prioritas Kriteria Pada Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (Kasus Penentuan Pemberian Kredit),” J-SAKTI (Jurnal Sains Komput. dan Inform., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022.
I. G. I. Sudipa and I. A. D. Puspitayani, “Analisis Sensitivitas AHP-SAW dan ROC-SAW dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Multikriteria,” Int. J. Nat. Sci. Eng., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 85–95, 2019.
E. Borgonovo and E. Plischke, “Sensitivity analysis: a review of recent advances,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 248, no. 3, pp. 869–887, 2016.
K. D. Goepel, “Implementation of an online software tool for the analytic hierarchy process (AHP-OS),” Int. J. Anal. Hierarchy Process, vol. 10, no. 3, 2018.
S. Widaningsih, “Analisis Sensitivitas Metode AHP Dengan Menggunakan Weighted Sum Model ( WSM ) Pada Simulasi Pemilihan Investasi Sektor Financial,” J. Inform., 2017.
D. N. Nafi, A. Mulyanto, and M. G. Wonoseto, “Perbandingan Sensitivitas Metode SAW Dan TOPSIS Dalam Pemilihan Ustadz Teladan Ponpes Wahid Hasyim Yogyakarta,” Fountain Informatics J., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 35–44, 2021.
G. W. Setiawan, J. Wahyudi, and A. Sudarsono, “Analisis Perbandingan Metode SAW dan Metode Topsis melalui Pendekatan Uji Sensitivitas Penilaian Kinerja Pegawai (Studi Kasus: Dinas Perhubungan Bengkulu Tengah),” MEANS (Media Inf. Anal. dan Sist., pp. 169–173, 2021.
D. Bhadra, N. R. Dhar, and M. A. Salam, “Sensitivity analysis of the integrated AHP-TOPSIS and CRITIC-TOPSIS method for selection of the natural fiber,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 56, pp. 2618–2629, 2022.
I. Indriyati, B. Surarso, and E. A. Sarwoko, “Sensitivity analysis of the AHP and TOPSIS methods for the selection of the best lecturer base on the academic achievement,” in Proceeding ISNPINSA Seminar International Diponegoro University, 2013, pp. 38–50.
A. Alinezhad and J. Khalili, New methods and applications in multiple attribute decision making (MADM), vol. 277. Springer, 2019.
R. D. Kusmiyanti and M. Mustakim, “Analisis Sensitivitas Metode Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique Terhadap Pembobotan Analytic Hierarchy Process,” 2017.
R. Latpate, J. Kshirsagar, V. Kumar Gupta, and G. Chandra, “Simple random sampling,” in Advanced Sampling Methods, Springer, 2021, pp. 11–35.
A. Darko, A. P. C. Chan, E. E. Ameyaw, E. K. Owusu, E. Pärn, and D. J. Edwards, “Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction,” Int. J. Constr. Manag., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 436–452, 2019.
A. K. Syaka and A. Mulyanto, “Analisis Perbandingan Sensitivitas AHP dan WP dalam Pemilihan Biro Perjalanan Umrah di Yogyakarta,” JISKA (Jurnal Inform. Sunan Kalijaga), vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 169–180, 2019.
I. G. I. Sudipa, I. K. A. G. Wiguna, I. N. T. A. Putra, and K. Hardiatama, “Implementasi Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process Dan Interpolasi Linier Dalam Penentuan Lokasi Wisata Di Kabupaten Karangasem,” J-SAKTI (Jurnal Sains Komput. dan Inform., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 866–878, 2021.
A. A. Chamid and A. C. Murti, “Kombinasi metode AHP dan Topsis pada sistem pendukung keputusan,” Pros. SNATIF, pp. 115–119, 2017.
A. P. Windarto, “Implementasi metode topsis dan saw dalam memberikan reward pelanggan,” Kumpul. J. Ilmu Komput, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 88–101, 2017.
W. Yusnaeni and R. Ningsih, “Analisa Perbandingan Metode Topsis, Saw Dan Wp Melalui Uji Sensitifitas Untuk Menentukan Pemilihan Supplier,” 2019.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Analisis Sensitivitas Metode AHP Dan TOPSIS Dalam Pemilihan Objek Wisata di Kabupaten Karangasem
Pages: 493-501
Copyright (c) 2022 I Gede Iwan Sudipa, I Kadek Hardiatama, Christina Purnama Yanti, I Komang Arya Ganda Wiguna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
