A Qualitative Study on Justice and Fairness Perception Through Kohlberg's Theory using Video Games
- Tony Wibowo Batam International University, Batam, Indonesia
- Deli Deli Batam International University, Batam, Indonesia
-
Hanita Hanita
*
Batam International University, Batam,
Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study explores how narrative-driven video games can enhance adolescents' moral reasoning, focusing on justice and fairness through Kohlberg’s moral development theory. Addressing the challenge of fostering advanced moral reasoning in youth, it highlights the limitations of traditional methods and the potential of video games to immerse players in ethical dilemmas. Using a qualitative approach, 35 adolescents played a story-based video game and participated in interviews and group discussions. Thematic analysis revealed that 60% began with pre-conventional reasoning, emphasizing individual rewards, but many advanced to conventional reasoning (Stage 4) after gameplay. A smaller group (15%) demonstrated post-conventional reasoning (Stage 5), considering fairness and abstract principles. While 40% found moral options confusing, 11.43% formed emotional connections with the narrative, underscoring the role of storytelling in fostering empathy and reflection. The findings suggest that thoughtfully designed video games can bridge gaps in moral education, offering engaging contexts for ethical exploration. This research supports integrating such games into curricula to enhance moral and cognitive growth in adolescents.
Downloads
References
L. Puigvert, A. Vidu, P. Melgar, and M. Salceda, “Bravenet upstander social network against second order of sexual harassment,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1–13, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13084135.
N. Persico, “A Theory of Non-Democratic Redistribution and Public Good Provision.” 2021.
S. Darwall, Modern Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to Kant (Evolution of Modern Philosophy). 2023.
G. C. Dano, “Well-being in the Advent of Capitalism: Maximization of Utility against Categorical Imperative,” E-Logos, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 71–82, 2023, doi: 10.18267/j.e-logos.501.
J. S. Mill, Utilitarianism. 2020.
A. S. T. B. Sinaga, R. B. Bukit, and R. Rujiman, “The Influence of Internal Control System, Individual Morality, and HR Competency on Fraud Prevention with Good Governance as An Intervening Variables: Study on OPD Deli Serdang Regency, North Sumatra,” J. Sains Sosio Hum., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 122–131, 2021, doi: 10.22437/jssh.v5i1.13977.
D. W. Noon, “Moral psychology and civil rights protesters: Exemplary, different, and mad,” J. GEEJ, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12915.
A. Yani, A. Pramita, H. Hartono, and H. Hodiyanto, “Android-Based Mobile Learning Media With Character,” AKSIOMA J. Progr. Stud. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 11, no. 2, p. 839, 2022, doi: 10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.4790.
R. Pradantyo, M. V. Birk, and S. Bateman, “How the Visual Design of Video Game Antagonists Affects Perception of Morality,” Front. Comput. Sci., vol. 3, no. April, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fcomp.2021.531713.
F. Junaidi, S. Suwandi, K. Saddhono, and N. E. Wardani, “Improving Students’ Social Intelligence Using Folktales during the Covid-19 Pandemic,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 209–228, 2022, doi: 10.29333/iji.2022.15312a.
S. Chen, Y. Gui, L. Liao, and Z. Shi, “The Impact of the American Game: ‘The Last of Us 2’ on the Shaping of Asian Gamers’ Cultural Identity,” Proc. 2021 Int. Conf. Soc. Dev. Media Commun. (SDMC 2021), vol. 631, no. Sdmc 2021, pp. 1140–1144, 2022, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.220105.209.
D. B. R. C. M. F. Y. K. D. S. Streiner, “It’s All Relative: Examining Student Ethical Decision Making in a Narrative Game-Based Ethical Intervention,” 2022 IEEE Front. Educ. Conf., pp. 1–6, 2022, doi: 10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962629.
C. R. Lochmiller, “Conducting thematic analysis with qualitative data,” Qual. Rep., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 2029–2044, 2021, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5008.
M. Naeem, W. Ozuem, K. Howell, and S. Ranfagni, “A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research,” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 22, no. October, pp. 1–18, 2023, doi: 10.1177/16094069231205789.
L. J. Cabeza-Ramírez, S. M. Sánchez-Cañizares, and F. J. Fuentes-García, “Motivations for the use of video game streaming platforms: The moderating effect of sex, age and self-perception of level as a player,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 17, no. 19, pp. 1–20, 2020, doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197019.
R. J. Utami, H. M. Zulfiati, and D. Hasanah, “Moral Development of Grade IV Elementary School Students based on Kohlberg’s Theory,” Edumaspul J. Pendidik., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 5566–5571, 2023, doi: 10.33487/edumaspul.v7i2.6796.
D. Bouhmama, “Assessment of Principled Moral reasoning of a Female Sample of Graduate students in Education,” Proc. The 2nd Int. Conf. Adv. Res. Educ. Teach. Learn., 2021, doi: 10.33422/2nd.rteconf.2020.03.44.
A. A. Rashid et al., “Evaluating ChatGPT’s moral competence in health care-related ethical problems,” JAMIA Open, vol. 7, no. 3. 2024, doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae065.
P. c. VITZ, “Critiques Of Kohlberg’s Model Of Moral Development: A Summary.” 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.22550/2174-0909.2061.
E. M. Ozer et al., “Fostering Engagement in Health Behavior Change: Iterative Development of an Interactive Narrative Environment to Enhance Adolescent Preventive Health Services,” J. Adolesc. Heal., vol. 67, no. 2, pp. S34–S44, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.04.022.
S. E. Hodge, J. Taylor, and J. McAlaney, “Is It Still Double Edged? Not for University Students’ Development of Moral Reasoning and Video Game Play,” Front. Psychol., vol. 11, no. June, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01313.
O. A. M. Rosmery Sabina Pozo Enciso and M. G. M. Vargas, “Moral judgement among university students in Ica: A view from the perspective of Lawrence Kohlberg.” p. 11, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.125433.2.
Pamsy P. Hui, Warren C. K. Chiu, Elvy Pang, John Coombes, and Doreen Y. P. Tse, “Seeing Through and Breaking Through: The Role of Perspective Taking in the Relationship Between Creativity and Moral Reasoning.” 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04876-3.
D. Polydorou, “Immersive storytelling experiences: a design methodology,” Digit. Creat., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 301–320, 2024, doi: 10.1080/14626268.2024.2389886.
M. Andrejević, D. Feuerriegel, W. Turner, S. Laham, and S. Bode, “Moral judgements of fairness-related actions are flexibly updated to account for contextual information,” Sci. Rep., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74975-0.
N. Darvishinia, T. Goodson, “Diversity, Representation, and Accessibility Concerns in Game Development,”arXiv, 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.04892
B. Chaarani, J. Ortigara, D. Yuan, H. Loso, A. Potter, and H. P. Garavan, “Association of Video Gaming with Cognitive Performance among Children,” JAMA Netw. Open, vol. 5, no. 10, p. E2235721, 2022, doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.35721.
E. Holl, S. Bernard, and A. Melzer, “Moral decision-making in video games: A focus group study on player perceptions,” Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 278–287, 2020, doi: 10.1002/hbe2.189.
D. D. B. R. T. C. M. F. Y. K. D. D. S. C. Streiner, “It’s All Relative: Examining Student Ethical Decision Making in a Narrative Game-Based Ethical Intervention,” IEEE Front. Educ. Conf., 2022, doi: 10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962629.
W. Toh, “The Player Experience and Design Implications of Narrative Games,” Int. J. Human–Computer Interact., no. 39, pp. 2742–2769, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2085404.
J. L. S. R. M. X. W. X. N. J. C. Brockett, “GENEVA: GENErating and Visualizing branching narratives using LLMs,” IEEE Conf. Games, pp. 1–5, 2024, doi: 10.1109/CoG60054.2024.10645625.
A. T. M. R.-T. K. K. E. Löfström, “Scaffolding Collaborative Case-Based Learning during Research Ethics Training,” J. Acad. Ethics, no. 19, pp. 229–252, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09378-x.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel A Qualitative Study on Justice and Fairness Perception Through Kohlberg's Theory using Video Games
Pages: 1536-1543
Copyright (c) 2025 Tony Wibowo, Deli Deli, Hanita Hanita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
