Perbandingan Jarak Euclidean dan Manhattan pada Pemetaan Potensial Tanaman Padi Menggunakan K-Means


  • Khoirul Rizky Asrofi Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar, Blitar, Indonesia
  • Risqi Darma Rusdyan Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar, Blitar, Indonesia
  • Vion Age Tricahyo Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar, Blitar, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: Euclidean Distance; Manhattan Distance; Rice; K-Means

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the potential of rice production in East Java by using 2 methods, namely Euclidean Distance and Manhattan Distance. By applying these two methods, the Department of Agriculture can gain a deeper understanding of the potential of rice production in each district or city. The analysis results show that K-Means with Euclidean Distance and Manhattan Distance can be used to identify areas with low, medium, and high rice potential. Comparison between the two methods using Silhouette Coefficient shows that Euclidean Distance has a superior value of 0.61, compared to Manhattan Distance which reaches 0.58. The findings provide practical solutions for the Department of Agriculture in an effort to improve food security and rice production in East Java, as well as making an academic contribution in the field of agricultural data analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

H. Husdi and Y. Lasena, “Real Time Analisys Berbasis Internet Of Things Untuk Prediksi Iklim Lahan Pertanian,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 834–840, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://ejurnal.stmik-budidarma.ac.id/index.php/mib/article/view/2165

D. H. Pujiningtyas and Y. Nangameka, “Mapping Potency of Excellent Comodity of Food Crops in Situbondo Regency,” J. Ilm. Agribios, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 43–54, 2018.

F. Marisa et al., “Digitasi Produktivitas Panen Padi Berbasis K-Means Clustering,” SMARTICS J., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 21–26, 2021.

A. L. Zahra, S. Tiara, R. Ada, and A. F. Ardini, “Implementasi Clustering Algoritma K-Means Pada Produksi Beras di Provinsi Jawa Timur Tahun 2022,” J. Comput. Inf. Syst. Ampera, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 2775–2496, 2024

Y. A. Singgalen, “Analisis Sentimen Pengunjung Pulau Komodo dan Pulau Rinca di Website Tripadvisor Berbasis CRISP-DM,” J. Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 614–625, 2023, doi: 10.47065/josh.v4i2.2999.

R. S. Auria, D. A. Puspitaningrum, and B. Widayanto, “Potensi Subsektor Tanaman Pangan Komoditas Padi di Kabupaten Klaten Provinsi Jawa Tengah,” AGRIFITIA J. Agribus. Plant., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 14–21, 2022, doi: 10.55180/aft.v2i1.199.

R. M. Koretsky, “Implementasi Metode Data Mining K-Means Clustering Terhadap Data Pembayaran Transaksi Menggunakan Bahasa Pemrograman Python Pada Cv Digital Dimensi,” Raspberry Pi OS Syst. Adm. with Syst. Python, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 175–305, 2023, doi: 10.1201/b23421-3.

L. Maulida, “Penerapan Datamining Dalam Mengelompokkan Kunjungan Wisatawan Ke Objek Wisata Unggulan Di Prov. Dki Jakarta Dengan K-Means,” JISKA (Jurnal Inform. Sunan Kalijaga), vol. 2, no. 3, p. 167, 2018, doi: 10.14421/jiska.2018.23-06.

B. P. Statistik, “Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Timur.” https://jatim.bps.go.id/id (accessed Jun. 14, 2024).

I. Ismawati, “Kajian Data Mining Profil Siswa Baru Dalam Penentuan Strategi Promosi Dengan Metode Two Step Clustering,” J. Ilm. Teknol. Infomasi Terap., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 47–59, 2019, doi: 10.33197/jitter.vol5.iss3.2019.302.

Haris Kurniawan, Sarjon Defit, and Sumijan, “Data Mining Menggunakan Metode K-Means Clustering Untuk Menentukan Besaran Uang Kuliah Tunggal,” J. Appl. Comput. Sci. Technol., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 80–89, 2020, doi: 10.52158/jacost.v1i2.102.

D. I. Kawasan, K. Makmur, D. Kadek, and P. Kumala, “Kajian Perkembangan Pola Ruang Fisik Spasial Permukiman Kumuh,” pp. 2045–2058, 2024.

Y. Risha, “Sejarah Geometri : Euclid Hingga Konsep Geometri Modern,” vol. 7, pp. 17009–17020, 2024.

A. Yudhana, S. Sunardi, and A. J. S. Hartanta, “Algoritma K-Nn Dengan Euclidean Distance Untuk Prediksi Hasil Penggergajian Kayu Sengon,” Transmisi, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 123–129, 2020, doi: 10.14710/transmisi.22.4.123-129.

E. Yulianto and A. Setiawan, “Optimasi Rute Sales Coverage Menggunakan Algoritma Cheapest Insertion Heuristic Dan Layanan Google Maps Api,” Intern. (Information Syst. Journal), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 39–54, 2018, doi: 10.32627/internal.v1i1.326.

C. A. Awaliyah, A. Prasetyadi, and A. Junaidi, “Sistem Rekomendasi Desain Website Berdasarkan Tingkat Kemiripan Menggunakan Euclidean Distance,” J. Dinda Data Sci. Inf. Technol. Data Anal., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 75–81, 2022, doi: 10.20895/dinda.v2i2.543.

S. Martha and W. Andani, “Komparasi Algoritma K-Nearest Neighbor Dengan Euclidean Distance Dan Manhattan Distance Untuk Klasifikasi Stunting Balita ( Studi Kasus : Puskesmas Kelurahan Parit Mayor ),” vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 285–292, 2024.

R. Alya Shafira, Yahfizham, and A. Muliani Harahap, “Menentukan Jarak Terpendek Dalam Pengiriman BarangDengan Perbandingan Euclidean Distance DanManhattan Distance,” J. Sci. Soc. Res., vol. VI, no. 3, pp. 678–685, 2023.

A. C. Fauzan, S. S. Wibowo, and M. Ahmad, “Performa Klasifikasi Berbasis Jarak untuk Deteksi Covid-19 Varian Delta dan Omicron Menggunakan Citra CT-Scan Paru-Paru,” J. Syst. Comput. Eng., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 62–81, 2023, doi: 10.47650/jsce.v4i1.714.

Y. Miftahuddin, S. Umaroh, and F. R. Karim, “Perbandingan Metode Perhitungan Jarak Euclidean, Haversine, Dan Manhattan Dalam Penentuan Posisi Karyawan,” J. Tekno Insentif, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 69–77, 2020, doi: 10.36787/jti.v14i2.270.

K. Pratama Simanjuntak and U. Khaira, “Hotspot Clustering in Jambi Province Using Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering Algorithm,” MALCOM Indones. J. Mach. Learn. Comput. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–16, 2021.

S. Paembonan and H. Abduh, “Penerapan Metode Silhouette Coefficient untuk Evaluasi Clustering Obat,” PENA Tek. J. Ilm. Ilmu-Ilmu Tek., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 48, 2021, doi: 10.51557/pt_jiit.v6i2.659.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Perbandingan Jarak Euclidean dan Manhattan pada Pemetaan Potensial Tanaman Padi Menggunakan K-Means

Dimensions Badge
Article History
Submitted: 2024-12-30
Published: 2025-01-31
Abstract View: 399 times
PDF Download: 443 times
How to Cite
Asrofi, K., Rusdyan, R., & Tricahyo, V. (2025). Perbandingan Jarak Euclidean dan Manhattan pada Pemetaan Potensial Tanaman Padi Menggunakan K-Means. Journal of Information System Research (JOSH), 6(2), 1346−1353. https://doi.org/10.47065/josh.v6i2.6582
Issue
Section
Articles