Kombinasi Metode AHP dan EDAS dalam Penilaian Kinerja Dosen di Perguruan Tinggi
-
Yuan Sa’adati
*
Universitas Qamarul Huda Badaruddin, Lombok Tengah,
Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Faculty performance evaluation is a process within an organization aimed at assessing and improving the performance of lecturers. Regular performance evaluations are essential for enhancing teaching quality and the professional development of faculty members. However, in practice, faculty performance evaluations are often still conducted manually, which may lead to human errors and delays in data processing, thereby affecting the timeliness of decision-making. Decision Support Systems (DSS) are introduced to assist in decision-making, particularly when there is uncertainty regarding the best approach to make a decision. This study adopts a combined methodology, using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for criterion weighting and Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) for ranking. The use of DSS aims to streamline the evaluation process while minimizing potential errors. The evaluation is based on six criteria: student evaluation, peer evaluation, education, research, community service, and participation in seminars or guest lecturing activities. The results consistently identify alternative A3 as the best option, with a score of 0.312 in the faculty performance evaluation.
Downloads
References
F. El Khair, S. Defit, and Y. Yuhandri, “Sistem Keputusan dengan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory dalam Penilaian Kinerja Pegawai,” J. Inf. dan Teknol., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 215–220, 2021, doi: 10.37034/jidt.v3i4.155.
D. Aldo, N. Putra, and Z. Munir, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Dosen dengan Menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory ( MAUT ),” Jursima, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 16–22, 2019, doi: 10.47024/js.v7i2.180.
E. Nurfarida, K. Eliyen, and B. A. Nugroho, “Perancangan Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kinerja Dosen Menggunakan Multy Attribute Utility Theory,” INOVTEK Polbeng - Seri Inform., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 274–282, 2020, doi: 10.35314/isi.v5i2.1579.
D. Y. Fallo, Y. Benufinit, and M. Sogen, “Penerapan Algoritma Promethee Dalam Penilaian Kinerja Dosen,” HINEF J. Rumpun Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 81–92, 2024, doi: 10.37792/hinef.v3i1.1183.
H. Arahman, “Tingkat Akurasi dalam Analisis Perbandingan Metode ORESTE dengan PSI terhadap Penilai Kinerja Dosen,” J. Inf. dan Teknol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2022, doi: 10.37034/jidt.v5i1.220.
Y. Sa’adati, F. Syuhada, M. Afriansyah, H. Rosika, and J. Saputra, “Implementation of the Edas Method To Determine Youtube Content Worth Watching for Children’S,” J. Tek. Inform., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 151–160, 2023, doi: 10.52436/1.jutif.2023.4.1.360.
J. H. P. Sitorus and R. Tambun, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product di AMIK Parbina Nusantara,” J. Bisantara Inform., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2020, doi: 10.21131/jbi.v4i1.16.
I. C. R. Drajana, N. Polimengo, and A. Riadi, “SPK Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Menggunakan Metode Multy Attribute Utility Theory,” Nusant. Eng., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 176–181, 2021, doi: 10.29407/noe.v4i2.16758.
D. P. Indini, T. A. Siregar, and D. P. Utomo, “Implementasi Metode EDAS Dalam Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 dengan Pembobotan Entropy,” J. Informatics, Electr. Electron. Eng., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 190–202, 2023, doi: 10.47065/jieee.v3i2.1613.
R. Efanda, Yuswardi, and Maryanti, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Dosen di Universitas Jabal Ghafur Menggunakan Metode 360 Degree Berbasis Web,” Sagita Acad. J., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 104–108, 2024, doi: 10.61579/sagita.v2i2.59.
F. T. Wulandari, A. Triayudi, Mesran, and K. Sussolaikah, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Menggunakan Metode AHP,” J. Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 592–602, 2024, doi: 10.26874/jumanji.v3i01.48.
J. F. Surbakti, I. Zulkarnain, and M. Hutasuhut, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Menentukan Prioritas Wilayah Perbaikan Jalan Menggunakan Metode ARAS,” J. Sist. Inf. Triguna Dharma (JURSI TGD), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 19–28, 2023, doi: 10.53513/jursi.v2i1.5416.
A. Rifqi and R. T. Aldisa, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Menerapkan Metode TOPSIS,” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 333–340, 2023, doi: 10.30865/klik.v4i1.1164.
D. Asdini, M. Khairat, and D. P. Utomo, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Manajer di PT . Pos Indonesia dengan Metode WASPAS,” vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 41–47, 2022, doi: 10.30865/jurikom.v9i1.3767.
M. Khairani, Y. S. Siregar, D. Handoko, N. I. Syahputri, and H. Harahap, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Metode WASPAS Dan TOPSIS Dalam Menentukan Dosen Terbaik Berdasarkan Variabel Bidang Keahlian,” Digit. Digit. Transform. Technol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 258–269, 2023, doi: 10.47709/digitech.v3i1.2761.
D. Fitria and Mardiningsih, “Kajian Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process ( AHP ) Dan Technique For Order Preference By Similarity To Ideal Solution ( TOPSIS ) Serta Penerapannya,” J. Pendidik. Berkarakter, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 128–138, 2024, doi: 10.51903/pendekar.v2i1.578.
M. Sundari, A. Asnawati, and I. Kanedi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Dosen Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Studi Kasus Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Dehasen Bengkulu,” J. Ilm. Tek. Mesin, Elektro dan Komput., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 28–43, 2024, doi: 10.51903/juritek.v4i1.2884.
G. Taufik, C. S. Rachman, and S. Janti, “Analytical Hirarchy Process Untuk Model Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Perekrutan Teller Pada Bank X,” INOVTEK Polbeng - Seri Inform., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 222–234, 2019, doi: 10.35314/isi.v4i2.1066.
Y. Sutikno and H. Saputra, “Optimasi Seleksi Jabatan Fungsional Umum Inspektur Bandar Udara Dengan Pendekatan Analytic Hierarchy Process ( AHP ),” J. Rekayasa Sist. Ind., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 47–58, 2024, doi: 10.26593/jrsi.v13i1.6596.47-58.
R. Doharma, L. Taufik, and A. Taufik, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Beasiswa Uang Kuliah Tunggal (UKT) dengan Metode Analitycal Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan Technique for Others Reference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS),” Infotech J. Technol. Inf., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 135–144, 2024, doi: 10.37365/jti.v10i1.266.
Hamsiah, “Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) sebagai Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Penerimaan Dosen,” Explor. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2023, doi: 10.47065/explorer.v3i2.686.
Suharti and D. Putro Utomo, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelayakan Penerima Bantuan Tanah Garapan Pada Desa Trans Aliaga Ujung Batu Iii Dengan Metode Distance From Average Solution ( EDAS ),” Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 43–55, 2021, doi: 10.30865/komik.v5i1.3647.
P. Fitriani and T. S. Alasi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dengan Metode WASPAS, COPRAS, dan EDAS : Menentukan Judul Skripsi,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1051–1061, 2020, doi: 10.30865/mib.v4i4.2431.
V. A. E. P, K. M. Sirait, and D. Perangin-angin, “Penerapan Metode ROC - EDAS dalam Menilai Kelayakan Penerimaan Karyawan Baru,” J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 327–340, 2024, doi: 10.70248/jcsit.v1i4.1276.
Salmon, P. Adytia, and M. Fahmi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerapan Metode EDAS Dalam Menyeleksi Konten Youtube Terbaik Untuk Anak Usia Dini,” vol. 7, pp. 2051–2060, 2023, doi: 10.30865/mib.v7i4.6747.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Kombinasi Metode AHP dan EDAS dalam Penilaian Kinerja Dosen di Perguruan Tinggi
Pages: 903-913
Copyright (c) 2024 Yuan Sa’adati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
