Perbandingan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dan Weight Product (WP) dalam Menentukan Penerima Zakat


  • Rayendra Rayendra * Mail Akademi Keperawatan Nabila, Padang Panjang, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: Zakat; Mustahiq; Simple Additive Weighting; Weighted Product; Ranking

Abstract

Zakat is part of a person's assets, which according to Islam, if the assets exceed the nishab limit, the owner is obliged to hand them over to someone who has the right to receive them under certain conditions or is called mustahiq zakat. To determine zakat mustahiq, BAZNAS Solok City collects data on prospective zakat recipients and determines mustahiq based on criteria determined manually. Therefore, through this research, the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Weighted Product (WP) methods are used to determine mustahiq zakat so that it can help BAZNAS Solok City in making decisions. There are five criteria used, residence status, monthly income, employment status, number of dependents, and monthly expenses. Monthly income is a cost criterion and the other is a profit criterion. After carrying out calculations using both methods, ranking results were obtained from prospective zakat recipients (mustahiq). In the SAW Method, the first ranking results were obtained for the fourth (A4) and ninth (A9) recipient candidates, as well as in the WP Method. However, there is a difference in ranking between third and fourth. It can be seen that the SAW and WP methods provide almost the same ranking results, but there are differences in several ranking orders even though the best rankings are in the same alternative. Through the sensitivity test, the results were obtained that the WP method has a higher sensitivity than the SAW method, that is 4,14% > 3,17%, so it can be concluded that the WP method is better used as decision support by decision makers, is BAZNAS Solok City.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Didin Hafhiduddin, Zakat dalam Perekonomian Modern, Jakarta: GemaInsani Press. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Zakat_dalam_perekonomian_modern/a6o2sAU07XkC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=zakat+profesi&pg=PA96&printsec=frontcover

Y. P. P. A.-Q. (penerjemah), I. K. Agama, and L. P. M. A.-Q. (pentashih), Al-Qur’an dan terjemahnya / Kementerian Agama RI ; penerjemah, Yayasan Penyelenggara Penerjemah Al-Qur’an ; disempurnakan oleh Lajnah Pentashih Mushaf Al-Qur’an. 2018.

S. A. M. bin Q. Al-Ghazi and A. H. Mubarok (Mutarjim), Fiqh Idola (2) Terjemah Fathul Qarib. 2019.

Menkumham RI, Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pelaksanaan UU. No. 23 Tahun 2011. 2014.

N. Setiawan et al., “Simple additive weighting as decision support system for determining employees salary,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., 2018.

B. F. T. Sopian and E. Ermatita, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Saw) Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Pemilihan Paket Layanan Internet,” Semin. Nas. Mhs. Ilmu Komput. dan Apl., vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 502–512, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://repository.unsri.ac.id/48001/

Nursaika, A. R. Pratama, S. El Hasyim, and R. Andreas, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dalam Penentuan Beasiswa SMPN 1 Dumai,” Semin. Nas. Penelit. Dan Pengabdi. Masy., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 119–126, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://journal.irpi.or.id/index.php/sentimas/article/view/319

K. Eliyen and F. S. Efendi, “Implementasi Metode Weighted Product Untuk Penentuan Mustahiq Zakat,” InfoTekJar (Jurnal Nas. Inform. dan Teknol. Jaringan), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 146–150, 2019, doi: 10.30743/infotekjar.v4i1.1476.

M. I. Sanusi, “Skala Prioritas Penentuan Mustahiq Zakat Di Lembaga Amil Zakat ( LAZ ) Ummat Sejahtera Ponorogo,” J. Stud. Islam dan Sos., vol. 2, no. c, pp. 106–112, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://lisyabab-staimas.e-journal.id/lisyabab

A. Gani, A. H. Kridalaksana, and Z. Arifin, “Analisa Perbandingan Metode Simple Additive Weighting ( SAW ) Dan Weight Product ( WP ) Dalam Pemilihan Kamera Mirrorless,” Inform. Mulawarman J. Ilm. Ilmu Komput., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 76–81, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.30872/jim.v14i2.1282

F. Haswan, “Application of Simple Additive Weighting Method to Determine Outstanding School Principals,” SinkrOn, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 186, 2019, doi: 10.33395/sinkron.v3i2.10082.

D. Wira Trise Putra and A. Agustian Punggara, “Comparison Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Weigthed Product (WP) in Decision Support Systems,” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 215, 2018, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201821501003.

Q. Fuady and Y. F. A. Lubis, “Analisis Perbandingan Metode WP dan SAW Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Persediaan Merek Sepatu Pada 45 Second Shoes,” J. Komput. Teknol. …, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 116–123, 2022, [Online]. Available: http://ejurnal.lkpkaryaprima.id/index.php/juktisi/article/view/21%0Ahttp://ejurnal.lkpkaryaprima.id/index.php/juktisi/article/download/21/22

S. Amelia and C. Prianto, “Uji Kinerja Metode Weighted Product Dan Simple Additive Weighting Dalam Proses Penentuan Artikel Media Informasi Internal Di PT Pos Indonesia (PERSERO),” Tek. Inform., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.stmik-dci.ac.id/index.php/jutekin/article/view/392%0Ahttps://jurnal.stmik-dci.ac.id/index.php/jutekin/article/viewFile/392/454

U. G. Rizka Aulia Fazri, “Perbandingan Simple Additive Weighting Dan Weighted Product Pada Keputusan Pemberian Bantuan Di Desa Cisarua,” vol. 8, no. 1, 2021.

F. Haswan, “Decision Support System For Election Of Members Unit Patients Pamong Praja,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Res., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 21, 2017, doi: 10.29099/ijair.v1i1.14.

S. Kusumadewi et al., “Neuro-Fuzzy: Integrasi Sistem Fuzzy dan Jaringan Syaraf,” Yogyakarta Graha Ilmu, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1–5, 2018.

L. V. Aprilian and M. H. K Saputra, Belajar cepat metode SAW. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en%5C&lr=%5C&id=SXvtDwAAQBAJ%5C&oi=fnd%5C&pg=PR10%5C&dq=kelayakan+penggunaan+sistem+artificial+intelligence+terhadap+efektivitas+sistem+informasi+manajemen%5C&ots=lv8V58cor6%5C&sig=-cRQTSmXgKLZj_4yV0EE8JfzcHw

R. Sri, K., Sri, H., Agus, H., & Wardoyo, “Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM).,” Graha Ilmu. Yogyakarta, 2006.

M. Rani, R. Ardiansyah, and D. Christina, “Sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan supplier cosmetic dengan metode weighted product,” JRTI (Jurnal Ris. Tindakan Indones., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 77, 2021, doi: 10.29210/3003848000.

K. P. Yoon and C. L. Hwang, Multiple attribute decision making: an introduction. 1995. [Online]. Available: http://www.google.com/books?hl=pt-BR&lr=&id=Fo47SWBuEyMC&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=Multiple+attribute+decision+making.+Quantitative+applications+in+the+social+sciences&ots=etjdLmFyzX&sig=4ZhTdxbPWHGi1u_Tr7zIfZ3uj5I

R. Roni, S. Sumijan, and J. Santony, “Metode Weighted Product dalam Pemilihan Penerima Beasiswa Bagi Peserta Didik,” J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 87–93, 2019, doi: 10.29207/resti.v3i1.834.

D. Fernando and N. Handayani, “Uji Sensitivitas Metode Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Menentukan Lokasi Penyebaran Media Promosi,” JSiI (Jurnal Sist. Informasi), vol. 5, no. 2, 2018, doi: 10.30656/jsii.v5i2.776.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Perbandingan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dan Weight Product (WP) dalam Menentukan Penerima Zakat

Dimensions Badge
Article History
Submitted: 2023-12-01
Published: 2024-01-22
Abstract View: 662 times
PDF Download: 748 times
How to Cite
Rayendra, R. (2024). Perbandingan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dan Weight Product (WP) dalam Menentukan Penerima Zakat. Journal of Information System Research (JOSH), 5(2), 498-508. https://doi.org/10.47065/josh.v5i2.4646
Section
Articles