Estimasi Jarak Pandang Meteorologi di Bandar Udara Menggunakan Metode Back Propagation dan CNN


  • Siti Maesaroh * Mail Stasiun Meteorologi Kelas I Radin Inten II, Lampung, Indonesia
  • Kurnia Muludi Institut Informatika dan Bisnis Darmajaya, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
  • Joko Triloka Institut Informatika dan Bisnis Darmajaya, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: Estimation; Visibility; Back Propagation; CNN; Weather; Airport

Abstract

Airports in Indonesia often face bad weather problems that affect visibility and impact flight operations. Historical data shows several incidents caused by decreased visibility due to fog or rain that resulted in flight delays and cancellations. It can be said that the importance of more accurate visibility estimates to improve safety and operational efficiency at airports. The purpose of this study was to determine the performance of the Back Propagation and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models in estimating meteorological visibility at airports because accurate visibility is very important in determining operational decisions, especially during bad weather conditions. The selection of the Back Propagation method is based on its advantages in handling various types of data dynamically and in a directed manner so that it is more precise in predicting visibility based on interrelated meteorological variables. While Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is very effective in handling problems involving image data. However, currently there are quite a lot of studies that use CNN for text processing because the results are quite promising. The data used is meteorological data that includes temperature, humidity, air pressure, wind speed and other parameters at Radin Inten II Airport. From the results of this study, the Backpropagation model is better in ROC AUC (85%) compared to CNN (84%), this shows a slight advantage in distinguishing classes. The CNN model is better in Precision by 71% compared to Back Propagation 70%, which means it is slightly better at avoiding false positive predictions. CNN has a higher correlation on the test data (0.20) compared to Back Propagation (0.18) indicating its predictions are slightly more in line with the actual data. The larger correlation difference in CNN (0.18) compared to Back Propagation (0.10) indicates a higher possibility of CNN overfitting compared to BP. Since both models show almost the same performance and the difference is not too significant, the choice of model can depend on the specific needs in the implementation. If the goal is to get a more stable model, then Backpropagation is more recommended because it has a smaller correlation difference and higher ROC AUC. However, if what is sought is a model with more accurate predictions in real scenarios, then CNN can be a better choice because it has higher Precision and better test correlation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

P. RI, “Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2021 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Bidang Penerbangan,” Peratur. Pemerintah Republik Indones., no. 086085, pp. 1–110, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://jdih.setkab.go.id/PUUdoc/176355/PP_Nomor_32_Tahun_2021.pdf

Y. Dermadi, S. D. Lukitasari, and A. Nurhayati, “Weather Analysis of Flight Delay at Husein Sastranegara Airport,” ITEJ (Information Technol. Eng. Journals), vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 89–98, 2019, doi: 10.24235/itej.v4i2.31.

International Civil Aviation Organization, “Doc 9817 Manual on Low-level Wind Shear,” pp. 1–213, 2005, Access Date 20 Feb 2025, [Online]. Available: https://standart.aero/en/icao/book/doc-9817-manual-on-low-level-wind-shear-en-cons

A. Luthfiarta, A. Febriyanto, H. Lestiawan, and W. Wicaksono, “Analisa Prakiraan Cuaca dengan Parameter Suhu, Kelembaban, Tekanan Udara, dan Kecepatan Angin Menggunakan Regresi Linear Berganda,” JOINS (Journal Inf. Syst., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 10–17, 2020, doi: 10.33633/joins.v5i1.2760.

Direktorat Jenderal Perhubungan Udara, “PR 26 TAHUN 2022 Tentang Pedoman Teknis Operasional Keselamatan Penerbangan Sipil Bagian 139-27 (Advisory CASR Part 139-27) Pedoman Pengoperasian dan Pemeliharaan Peralatan Pendaratan Visual,” Kemenhub, Access Date 20 Feb 2025, [Online]. Available: https://jdih.kemenhub.go.id/site/index

Kementrian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia, “Keputusan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor KM 41 Tahun 2001 Tentang Peraturan Keselamatan Penerbangan Sipil Bagian 91,” Kemenhub, Access Date 20 Feb 2025, [Online]. Available: https://jdih.kemenhub.go.id/site/index

A. Kurniawan and R. Z. A. Aziz, “Prediksi Kabut Bandar Udara di Indonesia Menggunakan Neural Network dan Radom Forest,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 746–757, 2024, doi: 10.47065/bits.v6i2.5544.

M. Fauzi et al., “Implementasi Machine Learning Untuk Memprediksi Cuaca Menggunakan Support Vector Machine,” J. Ilm. Komputasi, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 45–50, 2024, doi: 10.32409/jikstik.23.1.3499.

R. Nurpambudi and R. A. Aziz, “Prediksi Kejadian Banjir Di Wilayah Kota Bandar Lampung Dengan Metode Artificial Neural Network,” Proseding Semin. Nas. Has. Penelit. dan Pengabdi., pp. 93–104, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.darmajaya.ac.id/index.php/PSND/article/view/3254

D. R. Rochmawati, “Prediksi Cuaca Dengan Jaringan Syaraf Tiruan Menggunakan Python,” J. Teknol. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 162–171, 2024, doi: 10.59820/tekomin.v2i2.228.

D. A. H. Panggabean, F. M. Sihombing, and N. M. Aruan, “Prediksi Tinggi Curah Hujan Dan Kecepatan Angin Berdasarkan Data Cuaca Dengan Penerapan Algoritma Artificial Neural Network (Ann),” Seminastika, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2021, doi: 10.47002/seminastika.v3i1.237.

W. L. Lo, M. Zhu, and H. Fu, “Meteorology visibility estimation by using multi-support vector regression method,” J. Adv. Inf. Technol., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 40–47, 2020, doi: 10.12720/jait.11.2.40-47.

V. R. Duddu, S. S. Pulugurtha, A. S. Mane, and C. Godfrey, “Back-propagation neural network model to predict visibility at a road link-level,” Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect., vol. 8, no. September, p. 100250, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100250.

L. S. M. B, B. B. Harianto, and A. Musadek, "Airport Visibility Prediction System to Improve Aviation Safety", Proceedings of the International Conference on Advance Transportation, Engineering, and Applied Science (ICATEAS 2022), vol. 1. Atlantis Press International BV, 2023. doi: 10.2991/978-94-6463-092-3.

A. Saputra, S. R. Sulistiyanti, R. Marjunus, Y. Yuliant, J. Junaidi, and A. Surtono, “Penerapan Jaringan Saraf Tiruan / JST (Backpropagation) untuk Prakiraan Cuaca di Bandar Udara Radin Inten II Lampung,” J. Teor. dan Apl. Fis., vol. 11, no. 01, pp. 63–72, 2023, doi: 10.23960/jtaf.v11i1.3164.

F. M. Madjid, “Perbandingan prediksi vidibility menggunakan LSTM dan MLP di Bandara Sultan Mahmud Badaruddin II Palembang,” JSI J. Sist. Inf., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 2497–2507, 2022, doi: 10.18495/jsi.v14i1.16798.

Krisnawaty, P. Sari Ramadhan, and F. Rizky, “Penerapan Jaringan Saraf Tiruan Memprediksi Curah Hujan Harian Menggunakan Metode Backpropagation,” J. CyberTech, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 1297–1306, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://ojs.trigunadharma.ac.id/

M. D. A. Carnegie and C. Chairani, “Perbandingan Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) dan Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) Untuk Memprediksi Curah Hujan,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 1022, 2023, doi: 10.30865/mib.v7i3.6213.

E. S. P. Wulandari and R. A. Aziz, “Model Prediksi Dengan Artificial Neural Network Untuk,” Semin. Nas. Has. Penelit. dan Pengabdi. Masy., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 77–84, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.darmajaya.ac.id/index.php/PSND/article/view/3253

S. Sunardi, A. Yudhana, and G. Z. Muflih, “Sistem Prediksi Curah Hujan Bulanan Menggunakan Jaringan Saraf Tiruan Backpropagation,” J. Sist. Inf. Bisnis, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 155–162, 2020, doi: 10.21456/vol10iss2pp155-162.

L. Vinet and A. Zhedanov, "A missing family of classical orthogonal polynomials", Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, vol. 44, no. 8. 2011. doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/44/8/085201.

N. Hernandoko, P. W. Laksono, and N. Rosyidi, “Penerapan Sistem Kontrol Kualitas Dengan Menggunakan Model CNN Transfer Learning VGG 19 Pada Inspeksi Kain di Industri Tekstil,” Performa, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 166–170, 2024, doi: 10.20961/performa.23.2.86589.

E. Setia Budi, A. Nofriyaldi Chan, P. Priscillia Alda, and M. Arif Fauzi Idris, “Optimasi Model Machine Learning untuk Klasifikasi dan Prediksi Citra Menggunakan Algoritma Convolutional Neural Network,” RESOLUSI Rekayasa Tek. Inform. dan Inf., vol. 4, no. 5, p. 509, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://djournals.com/resolusi


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Estimasi Jarak Pandang Meteorologi di Bandar Udara Menggunakan Metode Back Propagation dan CNN

Dimensions Badge
Article History
Submitted: 2025-03-19
Published: 2025-06-01
Abstract View: 504 times
PDF Download: 340 times
How to Cite
Maesaroh, S., Muludi, K., & Triloka, J. (2025). Estimasi Jarak Pandang Meteorologi di Bandar Udara Menggunakan Metode Back Propagation dan CNN. Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS), 7(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.47065/bits.v7i1.7138
Section
Articles