Perbandingan Algoritma Support Vector Machine dan Decision Tree untuk Klasifikasi Performa Perusahaan


  • Mario Utomo * Mail Universitas Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Rastri Prathivi Universitas Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: Classification; Decision Tree; Support Vector Machine; Finance; Performance

Abstract

The number of stock exchange investors in Indonesia reached 5.34 million by the end of December 2023. This figure is dominated by millennial generation investors, indicating a growing confidence in the fundamentals and economic prospects of the Indonesian capital market. However, the lack of financial literacy among this generation often results in ineffective and high-risk investments. Many millennials choose stocks based on short-term trends or recommendations that lack analysis. To address this issue, a more structured approach to stock selection is required. One method that can be employed is the classification of a company's performance based on its performance using various financial indicators and ratios. As the performance of a company affects the movement of its stock value, this research will compare Support Vector Machine and Decision Tree with the One Against All approach in classifying company performance. The features used for the classification of company performance consist of three financial ratios: profitability (ROA), liquidity (CR), and leverage (DER). The labels or targets in the classification are divided into three categories: normal, good, and unfavorable. This research will consider evaluations such as accuracy, cross validation, and confusion matrix. The results of the Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm demonstrated an accuracy of 86.67%, while the Decision Tree (DT) algorithm exhibited an accuracy of 93.33%. Consequently, the DT algorithm produced more accurate results than the SVM algorithm in classification.

The number of stock exchange investors in Indonesia reached 5.34 million by the end of December 2023. This figure is dominated by millennial generation investors, indicating a growing confidence in the fundamentals and economic prospects of the Indonesian capital market. However, the lack of financial literacy among this generation often results in ineffective and high-risk investments. Many millennials choose stocks based on short-term trends or recommendations that lack analysis. To address this issue, a more structured approach to stock selection is required. One method that can be employed is the classification of a company's performance based on its performance using various financial indicators and ratios. As the performance of a company affects the movement of its stock value, this research will compare Support Vector Machine and Decision Tree with the One Against All approach in classifying company performance. The features used for the classification of company performance consist of three financial ratios: profitability (ROA), liquidity (CR), and leverage (DER). The labels or targets in the classification are divided into three categories: normal, good, and unfavorable. This research will consider evaluations such as accuracy, cross validation, and confusion matrix. The results of the Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm demonstrated an accuracy of 86.67%, while the Decision Tree (DT) algorithm exhibited an accuracy of 93.33%. Consequently, the DT algorithm produced more accurate results than the SVM algorithm in classification.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

T. Destiani and R. M. Hendriyani, “Analisis Rasio Keuangan untuk Menilai Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan,” Al-Kharaj J. Ekon. Keuang. Bisnis Syariah, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 33–51, 2021, doi: 10.47467/alkharaj.v4i1.488.

D. Tambunan, “Investasi Saham di Masa Pandemi COVID-19,” Widya Cipta J. Sekr. dan Manaj., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 117–123, 2020, doi: 10.31294/widyacipta.v4i2.8564.

Jony, “Sistem Rekomendasi Pemilihan Saham LQ45 Menggunakan Metode Topsis pada Banking,” JISyCS (Journal Inf. Syst. Comput. Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 59–66, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://www.jurnal.stmikmbcpalembang.ac.id/index.php/JISyCS/article/view/13.

E. Giyartiningrum, U. F. Azzahra, H. Prasetyo, and F. Swandari, “Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Berpengaruh terhadap Return Saham Perusahaan Jasa di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada Periode 2018-2021,” J. Samudra Ekon. dan Bisnis, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 331–340, 2023, doi: 10.33059/jseb.v14i2.7028.

L. R. Harahap, R. Anggraini, E. Ellys, and R. Y. Effendy, “Analisis Rasio Keuangan Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan Pt Eastparc Hotel, Tbk (Masa Awal Pandemi Covid-19),” Compet. J. Akunt. dan Keuang., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 57, 2021, doi: 10.31000/competitive.v5i1.4050.

M. Veronica and R. A. Pebriani, “Pengaruh Faktor Fundamental Dan Makro Ekonomi Terhadap Harga Saham Pada Perusahaan Industri Properti Di Bursa Efek Indonesia,” Islam. Bank. J. Pemikir. dan Pengemb. Perbank. Syariah, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 119–138, 2020, doi: 10.36908/isbank.v6i1.155.

A. L. Ulum, I. Sosial, D. A. N. Humaniora, P. Terhadap, and K. Keuangan, “PENGARUH RASIO LIKUIDITAS, SOLVABILITAS, AKTIVITAS DAN PROFITABILITAS TERHADAP KINERJA KEUANGAN PERUSAHAAN TELEKOMUNIKASI YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA (BEI) PERIODE TAHUN 2016-2020,” J. Ilmu Sos. dan Hum., vol. 8, no. April, pp. 32–44, 2022, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.31602/alsh.v8i1.6830.

G. D. Desriyunia, K. Wulandhari, D. Puspita, Jasmine, and T. Yulaeli, “Faktor-faktor rasio keuangan meliputi: Rasio likuiditas, rasio solvabilitas, rasio profitabilitas, rasio aktivitas, dan rasio investasi, berpengaruh terhadap kinerja laporan keuangan (literature review manajemen keuangan),” SAMMAJIVA J. Penelit. Bisnis dan Manaj., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 131–155, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.47861/sammajiva.v1i2.356.

N. Tambun, M. Mangantar, and V. N. Untu, “Analisis Pengaruh Rasio Likuiditas, Solvabilitas Dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Pada Perusahaan Telekomunikasi Indonesia Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia (Bei) Periode 2017-2021 Analysis of the Effect of Liquidity Ratio, Solvency and P,” 735 J. EMBA, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 735–746, 2022.

R. Tuntun, K. Kusrini, and K. Kusnawi, “Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Algoritma Klasifikasi dengan Menggunakan Metode K-Fold Cross Validation,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 2111, 2022, doi: 10.30865/mib.v6i4.4681.

Generosa Lukhayu Pritalia, “Analisis Komparatif Algoritme Machine Learning dan Penanganan Imbalanced Data pada Klasifikasi Kualitas Air Layak Minum,” KONSTELASI Konvergensi Teknol. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 43–55, 2022, doi: 10.24002/konstelasi.v2i1.5630.

R. Pakan and E. Mailoa, “Komparasi Kinerja Algoritma Mechine Learning Untuk Mengklasifikasi Penyakit Kanker Payudara,” J. Ilm. Komput., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 493–503, 2024, doi: 10.35889/progresif.v20i1.1812.

D. Septhya et al., “Implementasi Algoritma Decision Tree dan Support Vector Machine untuk Klasifikasi Penyakit Kanker Paru,” MALCOM Indones. J. Mach. Learn. Comput. Sci., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 15–19, 2023, doi: 10.57152/malcom.v3i1.591.

M. Amirudin and A. D. Wowor, “Analisis Perbandingan Klasifikasi Balita Beresiko Stunting Menggunakan Metode Support Vector Machine dan Decission Tree,” Conf. Electr. Eng. Informatics, Ind. Technol. Creat. Media, vol. 3, pp. 1–11, 2023.

J. Bonardo Junior, R. Rohmat Saedudin, and V. P. Widharta, “Perbandingan Akurasi Algorima Decision Tree Dan Algoritma Support Vector Machine Pada Penyakit Diabetes,” e-Proceeding Eng., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 9749–9756, 2021.

N. G. Ramadhan and A. Khoirunnisa, “Klasifikasi Data Malaria Menggunakan Metode Support Vector Machine,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 1580, 2021, doi: 10.30865/mib.v5i4.3347.

R. S. Tantika, P. Statistika, F. Matematika, and P. Alam, “Klasifikasi pada Data Pasien Penyakit Tiroid dengan Metode SVM,” Bandung Conf. Ser. Stat., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 159–166, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.29313/bcss.v2i2.3590.

D. Ananda and R. R. Suryono, “Analisis Sentimen Publik Terhadap Pengungsi Rohingya di Indonesia dengan Metode Support Vector Machine dan Naïve Bayes,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 8, no. April, pp. 748–757, 2024, doi: 10.30865/mib.v8i2.7517.

M. Napiah, R. D. Astuti, and E. K. Pratama, “Komparasi Algoritma Machine Learning untuk Klasifikasi Gejala Coronavirus Disease 19 (Covid-19),” Comput. Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 78–83, 2023, doi: 10.31294/coscience.v3i2.1984.

M. H. Wicaksono, M. D. Purbolaksono, and S. Al Faraby, “Perbandingan Algoritma Machine Learning untuk Analisis Sentimen Berbasis Aspek pada Review Female Daily,” eProceedings Eng., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 3591–3600, 2023.

F. N. Dhewayani, D. Amelia, D. N. Alifah, B. N. Sari, and M. Jajuli, “Implementasi K-Means Clustering untuk Pengelompokkan Daerah Rawan Bencana Kebakaran Menggunakan Model CRISP-DM,” J. Teknol. dan Inf., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 64–77, 2022, doi: 10.34010/jati.v12i1.6674.

T. P. Humairah, M. Z. Hakim, and D. S. Abbas, “Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Likuiditas, Dan Leverage Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Ekon. DAN BISNIS, vol. 1, no. June, pp. 339–351, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.32528/psneb.v0i0.5186.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Perbandingan Algoritma Support Vector Machine dan Decision Tree untuk Klasifikasi Performa Perusahaan

Dimensions Badge
Article History
Submitted: 2024-06-04
Published: 2024-06-23
Abstract View: 793 times
PDF Download: 443 times
How to Cite
Utomo, M., & Prathivi, R. (2024). Perbandingan Algoritma Support Vector Machine dan Decision Tree untuk Klasifikasi Performa Perusahaan. Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS), 6(1), 105−114. https://doi.org/10.47065/bits.v6i1.5278
Issue
Section
Articles