Decision Support System for Determining the Best Internship Students Using the Combined Compromise Solution Method
Abstract
Interns are individuals who are undergoing a period of practical learning in an organization or company as part of their educational curriculum. During the internship, students have the opportunity to apply the knowledge they learn in class to real-world situations, as well as gain valuable work experience. The selection of the best intern can involve several problems or challenges. One of them is the difficulty in evaluating students' practical skills based solely on their academic performance. The Decision Support System (DSS) to determine the best internship students using the Combined Compromise Solution Method provides a holistic approach in the selection process. This method combines elements of the Compromise Solution Method that consider compromise solutions between alternatives. With this comprehensive approach, DSS can assist institutions or companies in selecting internship students that best suit their needs and expectations, as well as ensure the success of internships that are beneficial to both parties. The results of the ranking of the best internship student alternatives showed that rank 1st with a value of 5.7847 was obtained by Jonathan, rank 2nd with a value of 5.2625 was obtained by Handoko R, and rank 3rd with a value of 4.6117 was obtained by M. Ali Fikri. The results of this ranking help companies determine the best internship students by applying the combine compromise solution method
Downloads
References
A. S. Gohae, “Pengalaman magang, minat kerja dan pengaruhnya terhadap kesiapan kerja mahasiswa akuntansi,” J. Ilm. Manajemen, Ekon. Akunt., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1954–1964, 2020.
D. Aswita, “Merdeka belajar kampus merdeka (MBKM): inventarisasi mitra dalam pelaksanaan magang Mahasiswa fakultas keguruan dan ilmu pendidikan,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Biologi, Teknologi dan Kependidikan, 2022, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 56–61.
J. D. Manik, A. R. Samosir, and M. Mesran, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting dalam Penerimaan Siswa Magang Pada Universitas Budi Darma,” sudo J. Tek. Inform., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 51–59, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.56211/sudo.v1i2.14.
A. Paliling, “Penerapan Metode AHP Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penempatan Mahasiswa Magang,” E-JURNAL JUSITI J. Sist. Inf. dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 135–146, 2022, doi: 10.36774/jusiti.v11i2.1136.
N. N. Sihombing, R. T. Aldisa, and Y. P. Simatupang, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Pada Siswa Magang dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” Bull. Comput. Sci. Res., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 155–161, 2024, doi: 10.47065/bulletincsr.v4i2.331.
R. H. Maharrani, A. R. Supriyono, and L. Syafirullah, “SIPGANG: Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekomendasi Magang Industri Berbasis Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT),” J. Edukasi dan Penelit. Inform., vol. 7, no. 3, p. 473, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.26418/jp.v7i3.49478.
L. Sinambela and L. Nababan, “IMPLEMENTASI METODE TOPSIS DALAM PENERIMAAN MAHASISWA MAGANG PADA YAYASAN PERGURUAN IMMANUEL MEDAN,” JTIK (Jurnal Tek. Inform. Kaputama), vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 286–296, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.59697/jtik.v7i2.77.
R. Rosati et al., “From knowledge-based to big data analytic model: a novel IoT and machine learning based decision support system for predictive maintenance in Industry 4.0,” J. Intell. Manuf., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 107–121, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10845-022-01960-x.
V. Zamani, H. Taghaddos, and Y. Gholipour, “Simulation-based decision support system for earthmoving operations using computer vision,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 124, p. 106564, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106564.
A. Soussi, A. M. Tomasoni, E. Zero, and R. Sacile, “An ICT-Based Decision Support System (DSS) for the Safety Transport of Dangerous Goods along the Liguria and Tuscany Mediterranean Coast,” in Intelligent Sustainable Systems: Selected Papers of WorldS4 2022, Volume 2, Springer, 2023, pp. 629–638. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-7663-6_59.
H. Sulistiani, Setiawansyah, P. Palupiningsih, F. Hamidy, P. L. Sari, and Y. Khairunnisa, “Employee Performance Evaluation Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) with PIPRECIA-S Weighting: A Case Study in Education Institution,” in 2023 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Informations System (ICIMCIS), 2023, pp. 369–373. doi: 10.1109/ICIMCIS60089.2023.10349017.
Setiawansyah, A. A. Aldino, P. Palupiningsih, G. F. Laxmi, E. D. Mega, and I. Septiana, “Determining Best Graduates Using TOPSIS with Surrogate Weighting Procedures Approach,” in 2023 International Conference on Networking, Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology (IConNECT), 2023, pp. 60–64. doi: 10.1109/IConNECT56593.2023.10327119.
V. H. Saputra and T. Ardiansah, “Penerapan Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) Method Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Modem,” J. Ilm. Comput. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–16, 2022, doi: 10.58602/jics.v1i1.2.
M. Yazdani, Z. Wen, H. Liao, A. Banaitis, and Z. Turskis, “A grey combined compromise solution (CoCoSo-G) method for supplier selection in construction management,” 2019.
Z. Wen, H. Liao, A. Mardani, and A. Al-Barakati, “A hesitant fuzzy linguistic combined compromise solution method for multiple criteria decision making,” in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management: Volume 1 13, 2020, pp. 813–821.
Y. M. Kristania, “Penerapan Combined Compromise Solution Method Dalam Penentuan Penerima Beasiswa,” Chain J. Comput. Technol. Comput. Eng. Informatics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 44–55, 2023.
P. Rani, J. Ali, R. Krishankumar, A. R. Mishra, F. Cavallaro, and K. S. Ravichandran, “An integrated single-valued neutrosophic combined compromise solution methodology for renewable energy resource selection problem,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 15, p. 4594, 2021.
K.-H. Chang, “Integrating Subjective–Objective Weights Consideration and a Combined Compromise Solution Method for Handling Supplier Selection Issues,” Systems, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 74, 2023.
X. Peng and W. Li, “Spherical fuzzy decision making method based on combined compromise solution for IIoT industry evaluation,” Artif. Intell. Rev., pp. 1–30, 2022.
F. Jahan, M. Soni, A. Parveen, and M. Waseem, “Application of combined compromise solution method for material selection,” in Advancement in Materials, Manufacturing and Energy Engineering, Vol. I: Select Proceedings of ICAMME 2021, 2022, pp. 379–387.
M. R. Ramadhan, M. K. Nizam, and M. Mesran, “Penerapan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) Dalam Pemilihan Siswa-Siswi Berprestasi Pada Sekolah SMK Swasta Mustafa,” TIN Terap. Inform. Nusant., vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 459–471, 2021.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Decision Support System for Determining the Best Internship Students Using the Combined Compromise Solution Method
Pages: 607−618
Copyright (c) 2023 A. Ferico Octaviansyah Pasaribu, Ahmad Ari Aldino, Ade Surahman, Setiawansyah Setiawansyah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).