Land Price Classification Map in Jakarta Using Random Forest and Ordinary Kriging


  • Naufal Alvin Chandrasa * Mail Telkom University, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Sri Suryani Prasetyowati Telkom University, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Yuliant Sibaroni Telkom University, Bandung, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: Land Price; Jakarta; Classification; Random Forest; Ordinary Kriging

Abstract

This research provides information about land prices in Jakarta by classifying using the Random Forest method.  Where Random Forest is a data mining technique that is usually used to perform classification and regression.  Random Forest is one of the best classification methods.  It is found that classification accuracy will increase dramatically as a result of voting to select class types and ensemble tree growth.  The method helps in providing information about the classification of land prices with the class of land prices per meter less than IDR 15 million, land prices per meter with a price range of IDR 15 to 25 million and land prices per meter more than IDR 25 million. With a fairly good accuracy of 82%, this method can classify where the permeter land price data that is tested will match the predicted classification accurately.  Classification is performed on unbalanced data which is then oversampled using the ADASYN method.  Assisted by doing spatial interpolation with the Ordinary Kriging method using Semivariogram, information about the classification of land prices can be seen on the distribution of the Jakarta area map.  Ordinary Kriging can predict the estimated price per meter of land around the area of land that has a known price.  The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) results of the best Semivariogram model are obtained from the lowest RMSE value, namely the Spherical model with a value of 1.014896e7.  The contribution of this research is to provide information about a reliable classification method, namely Random Forest and Ordinary Kriging performance as a spatial analysis method that can predict land prices per meter at unknown points so as to provide information about the distribution of land prices in Jakarta with each price class.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Novita, “Kondisi Properti Masih Wait and See, Permintaan Apartemen Alami Recovery,” Rumah.com, 2022. https://www.rumah.com/informasi-perusahaan/kondisi-properti-masih-wait-and-see-permintaan-apartemen-alami-recovery-64169 (accessed Jun. 09, 2022).

I. Fata Robbany, A. Gharghi, and K.-P. Traub, “Land Use Change Detection and Urban Sprawl Monitoring in Metropolitan Area of Jakarta (Jabodetabek) from 2001 to 2015,” KnE Eng., vol. 2019, pp. 257–268, 2019, doi: 10.18502/keg.v4i3.5862.

C. D. Putra, A. Ramadhani, and E. Fatimah, “Increasing Urban Heat Island area in Jakarta and it’s relation to land use changes,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Apr. 2021, vol. 737, no. 1. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/737/1/012002.

C. Shousong, G. Xiaomin, W. Xiaoguang, and C. Ying, “Research on Urban Land Price Assessment Based on Artificial Neural Network Model,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 180738–180748, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2958978.

N. Dogru and A. Subasi, “Traffic accident detection using random forest classifier,” 2018 15th Learn. Technol. Conf. L T 2018, pp. 40–45, 2018, doi: 10.1109/LT.2018.8368509.

V. F. Rodriguez-Galiano, B. Ghimire, J. Rogan, M. Chica-Olmo, and J. P. Rigol-Sanchez, “An assessment of the effectiveness of a random forest classifier for land-cover classification,” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 93–104, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.11.002.

N. M. Abdulkareem and A. M. Abdulazeez, “Machine learning classification based on Random Forest Algorithm: A review,” J. Sci. Bus., vol. 27, no. January, pp. 128–142, 2021, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4471118.

J. Magidi, L. Nhamo, S. Mpandeli, and T. Mabhaudhi, “Application of the random forest classifier to map irrigated areas using google earth engine,” Remote Sens., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1–15, 2021, doi: 10.3390/rs13050876.

M. Molinari, M. R. Fida, M. K. Marina, and A. Pescape, “Spatial interpolation based cellular coverage prediction with crowdsourced measurements,” C2B(I)D 2015 - Proc. 2015 ACM SIGCOMM Work. Crowdsourcing Crowdsharing Big Data, Part SIGCOMM 2015, pp. 33–38, 2015, doi: 10.1145/2787394.2787395.

D. Ozturk and F. Kilic, “Geostatistical approach for spatial interpolation of meteorological data,” An. Acad. Bras. Cienc., vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 2121–2136, 2016, doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201620150103.

Y. Ghiasi and V. Nafisi, “Strain estimation using ordinary Kriging interpolation,” Surv. Rev., vol. 48, no. 350, pp. 361–366, 2016, doi: 10.1080/00396265.2015.1116155.

S. A. Alasadi and W. S. Bhaya, “Review of data preprocessing techniques in data mining,” J. Eng. Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 16, pp. 4102–4107, 2017, doi: 10.3923/jeasci.2017.4102.4107.

P. Ferreira, D. C. Le, and N. Zincir-Heywood, “Exploring Feature Normalization and Temporal Information for Machine Learning Based Insider Threat Detection,” 15th Int. Conf. Netw. Serv. Manag. CNSM 2019, no. Cnsm, 2019, doi: 10.23919/CNSM46954.2019.9012708.

V. Y. Kulkarni and P. K. Sinha, “Pruning of random forest classifiers: A survey and future directions,” Proc. - 2012 Int. Conf. Data Sci. Eng. ICDSE 2012, pp. 64–68, 2012, doi: 10.1109/ICDSE.2012.6282329.

A. Cutler, D. R. Cutler, and J. R. Stevens, “Ensemble Machine Learning,” Ensemble Mach. Learn., no. February 2014, 2012, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9326-7.

A. K. Sandhu and R. S. Batth, “Software reuse analytics using integrated random forest and gradient boosting machine learning algorithm,” in Software - Practice and Experience, Apr. 2021, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 735–747. doi: 10.1002/spe.2921.

M. Hossin and M. . Sulaiman, “a Review on Evaluation Metrics for Data,” Int. J. Data Min. Knowl. Manag. Process, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2015.

D. Laffly, “PART 2 Basic Mathematical, Statistical and Computational Tools,” 2020.

A. Gosain and S. Sardana, “Handling class imbalance problem using oversampling techniques: A review,” 2017 Int. Conf. Adv. Comput. Commun. Informatics, ICACCI 2017, vol. 2017-Janua, pp. 79–85, 2017, doi: 10.1109/ICACCI.2017.8125820.

D. Elreedy and A. F. Atiya, “A Comprehensive Analysis of Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) for handling class imbalance,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 505, pp. 32–64, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.07.070.

Z. Lianheng, Z. Shuaihao, H. Dongliang, Z. Shi, and L. Dejian, “Quantitative characterization of joint roughness based on semivariogram parameters,” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., vol. 109, no. May, pp. 1–8, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.06.008.

J. Ibrahim, M.-H. Chen, and D. Sinha, Springer Series in Statistics, vol. 27, no. 2. 2009. [Online]. Available: http://www.springerlink.com/index/D7X7KX6772HQ2135.pdf

T. G. Pham, M. Kappas, C. Van Huynh, and L. H. K. Nguyen, “Application of ordinary kriging and regression kriging method for soil properties mapping in hilly region of central Vietnam,” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Information, vol. 8, no. 3, 2019, doi: 10.3390/ijgi8030147.

L. Jackson, J. Zuo, Z. Zhao, G. Zillante, and Y. Feng, Critical Success Factors for Refurbishment Projects. 2015. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-46994-1_98.

R. Cellmer and S. Zrobek, “The Cokriging Method in the Process of Developing Land Value Maps,” Proc. - 2017 Balt. Geod. Congr. (Geomatics), BGC Geomatics 2017, pp. 364–368, 2017, doi: 10.1109/BGC.Geomatics.2017.14.

H. Crosby, T. Damoulas, A. Caton, P. Davis, J. Porto de Albuquerque, and S. A. Jarvis, “Road distance and travel time for an improved house price Kriging predictor,” Geo-Spatial Inf. Sci., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 185–194, 2018, doi: 10.1080/10095020.2018.1503775.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Land Price Classification Map in Jakarta Using Random Forest and Ordinary Kriging

Dimensions Badge
Article History
Submitted: 2022-07-20
Published: 2022-09-25
Abstract View: 1356 times
PDF Download: 559 times
How to Cite
Chandrasa, N., Prasetyowati, S., & Sibaroni, Y. (2022). Land Price Classification Map in Jakarta Using Random Forest and Ordinary Kriging. Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS), 4(2), 674−683. https://doi.org/10.47065/bits.v4i2.1896
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >>