Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Distributor Terbaik Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS dan Pembobotan ROC
Abstract
Distributors are important intermediaries in the supply chain to distribute products from producers to retailers or to end consumers. The best distributors are strategic partners who play a vital role in the success of the supply chain and marketing of products. The main problem in choosing the best distributor often revolves around several critical factors. The best distributors must have a commitment to innovation in the distribution process and continuous improvement to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and meet the challenges of the ever-changing market. The purpose of this study is to develop and implement a decision support system for the selection of the best distributor using the TOPSIS method and ROC weighting, to assist companies in identifying and selecting the distributor that is most in accordance with the criteria that have been set. The ROC method is based on a ranking of criteria given by decision-makers. The results of the ranking of the best distributor selection show that the first best distributor with a final score of 0.72949 was obtained by Garuda Food, the second best distributor with a final score of 0.64131 was obtained by Wings Food, and the third best distributor with a final score of 0.61099 was obtained by Toko Lucky. The results of this ranking are the basis for optimizing its distribution network for the company. By choosing distributors that have the highest ratings, companies can ensure that their products reach customers with the highest quality and on time. These rankings not only assist companies in making strategic decisions but also drive quality and efficiency improvements throughout the supply chain.
Downloads
References
J. D. Manik, A. R. Samosir, and M. Mesran, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting dalam Penerimaan Siswa Magang Pada Universitas Budi Darma,” sudo J. Tek. Inform., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 51–59, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.56211/sudo.v1i2.14.
T. S. Diri, E. Fatkhiyah, and R. Y. Ariyana, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Objek Wisata Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product (Studi Kasus: Objek Wisata Pantai Pulau Adonara Kabupaten Flores Timur),” J. Scr., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 32–39, 2022.
N. A. Putri and H. Kurniawan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Reseller Terbaik Menggunakan Metode ARAS berbasis WEB Pada Inside Computer House,” J. Rekayasa Sist., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 272–284, 2024.
P. Citra, I. W. Sriyasa, and H. B. Santoso, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Kinerja Sales Terbaik Menggunakan Kombinasi Grey Relational Analysis dan Pembobotan Rank Sum,” J. Ilm. Comput. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 99–108, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.58602/jics.v2i2.26.
D. Tešić, M. Radovanović, D. Božanić, D. Pamucar, A. Milić, and A. Puška, “Modification of the DIBR and MABAC Methods by Applying Rough Numbers and Its Application in Making Decisions,” Information, vol. 13, no. 8, p. 353, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.3390/info13080353.
F.-M. Toma, “A hybrid neuro-experimental decision support system to classify overconfidence and performance in a simulated bubble using a passive BCI,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 212, p. 118722, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118722.
D. A. Prameswari and A. Hadi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Pada Diskominfo Di Kabupaten Nganjuk Berbasis Web,” J. Ilm. Teknol. Inf. Asia, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 147, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.32815/jitika.v17i2.931.
H. Sulistiani, U. Adji, and S. Maryana, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Memilih Bibit Kedelai Menggunakan Kombinasi Metode TOPSIS dan ROC,” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1381–1389, 2023.
E. Sufarnap, “Perbandingan Metode Pengambilan Keputusan pada Pemilihan Hotel Berbasis SAW dan TOPSIS,” J. SIFO Mikroskil, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 73–82, 2022.
Irfan, Amil A.Ilham, Imran Taufik, and D. Suarna, “Sistem Rekomendasi Penentuan Titik Usaha Kafe Menggunakan Data Spasial dan Algoritma Topsis,” Bull. Inf. Technol., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 400–407, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.47065/bit.v4i3.918.
Q. Wang, T. Cheng, Y. Lu, H. Liu, R. Zhang, and J. Huang, “Underground Mine Safety and Health: A Hybrid MEREC–CoCoSo System for the Selection of Best Sensor,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 4, p. 1285, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.3390/s24041285.
H. Dinçer, S. Yüksel, and S. Eti, “Identifying the Right Policies for Increasing the Efficiency of the Renewable Energy Transition with a Novel Fuzzy Decision-Making Model,” J. Soft Comput. Decis. Anal., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 50–62, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.31181/jscda1120234.
H. Komasi, S. H. Zolfani, and A. Nemati, “Evaluation of the social-cultural competitiveness of cities based on sustainable development approach,” Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 583–602, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.31181/dmame06012023k.
I. Oktaria, “Kombinasi Metode Multi-Attribute Utility Theory ( MAUT ) dan Rank Order Centroid ( ROC ) dalam Pemilihan Kegiatan Ekstrakulikuler,” J. Ilm. Inform. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2023.
R. T. Aldisa, “Penerapan Metode Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Laboratorium Menggunakan Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid (ROC),” J. Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 4, no. 4, 2023.
M. W. Arshad, “Combination of Multi-Attributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis and Rank Order Centroid in Supplier Performance Evaluation,” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 2330–2341, 2024, doi: 10.30865/klik.v4i4.1677.
H. Prilani and B. M. Sulthon, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Distributor Terbaik Dengan Metode SAW,” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 216–224, 2022.
A. D. Wahyudi and A. R. Isnain, “Penerapan Metode TOPSIS untuk Pemilihan Distributor Terbaik,” J. Artif. Intell. Technol. Inf., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 59–70, 2023.
D. Nurnaningsih and S. Setiawansyah, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Optimalisasi Pemilihan Agen Penjualan Menggunakan Metode Entropy dan Multi Attribute Utility Theory,” J. Media Jawadwipa, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 44–54, 2024, doi: 10.58602/mediajawadwipa.v1i2.46.
R. Arundaa and A. L. Kalua, “Implementasi Multiple Attribute Decision Making Dalam Pemilihan Distributor Terbaik Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS,” J. Ilm. Comput. Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 77–87, 2023, doi: 10.58602/jics.v1i2.9.
A. M. N. C. Ribeiro, D. F. H. Sadok, M. E. da Cruz Brito, Á. de Araújo Cavalcanti, P. T. Endo, and J. Kelner, “Comparative analysis of current transducers for development of smart plug through rank order centroid method,” IEEE Lat. Am. Trans., vol. 18, no. 01, pp. 147–155, 2020, doi: 10.1109/TLA.2020.9049472.
I. Oktaria, “Kombinasi Metode Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) dan Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dalam Pemilihan Kegiatan Ekstrakulikuler,” J. Ilm. Inform. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2023.
H.-Q. Nguyen, V.-T. Nguyen, D.-P. Phan, Q.-H. Tran, and N.-P. Vu, “Multi-criteria decision making in the PMEDM process by using MARCOS, TOPSIS, and MAIRCA methods,” Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 8, p. 3720, 2022.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Distributor Terbaik Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS dan Pembobotan ROC
Pages: 1251-1260
Copyright (c) 2024 Febriza Puja Kesuma, Rusliyawati Rusliyawati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).






















