Experimental Comparative Performance Analysis of Li-Po and Li-Ion Batteries Using Telemetry-Based Flight Testing in Fixed-Wing UAV for KRTI LELA Mission


  • Tadeus Ferdinan Dato Odja * Mail Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Muhamad Syariffuddien Zuhrie Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Agus Wiyono Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Fendi Achmad Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Sayyidul Aulia Alamsyah Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: Fixed-wing UAV; Lithium-Polymer; Lithium-Ion; Long Endurance Low Altitude; KRTI

Abstract

The Indonesian Flying Robot Contest (KRTI) Long Endurance Low Altitude (LELA) division evaluates fixed-wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) not only based on endurance, but also on mission completion speed, where faster completion yields additional scoring points. This study aims to analyze and compare the performance characteristics of Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) and Lithium-Ion (Li-ion) batteries in fixed-wing UAV operations and to evaluate their suitability based on competition-oriented mission strategies. An experimental approach was employed by conducting flight tests under identical UAV configurations, autonomous waypoint trajectories, flight altitudes, and termination voltage limits to ensure consistency. The evaluated parameters include voltage behavior, average current consumption, flight duration, cruising speed, and distance traveled. The results indicate that the Li-Po battery achieved a longer flight duration of 51 minutes with a lower average current of 18.82 A and a cruising speed of 25 m/s, demonstrating stronger endurance capability. Conversely, the Li-ion battery exhibited a shorter flight duration of 39 minutes but operated at a higher cruising speed of 32.5 m/s with an average current of 30.77 A, enabling a longer travel distance of 68.4 km compared to 64.5 km for the Li-Po battery. These findings highlight a significant trade-off between endurance and mission completion speed. The study confirms that battery selection in fixed-wing UAV operations for KRTI LELA should be aligned with mission scoring priorities rather than focusing solely on endurance. Furthermore, this research contributes to UAV energy system optimization by experimentally demonstrating the interaction between battery characteristics and operational strategies in determining mission performance outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahoutou, Y., Ilinca, A., & Issa, M. (2022). Electrochemical Cells and Storage Technologies to Increase Renewable Energy Share in Cold Climate Conditions—A Critical Assessment. Energies, 15(4), 1579. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15041579

Alotaibi, A., Chatwin, C., & Birch, P. (2023). Ubiquitous Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): A Comprehensive Review. Shanlax International Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities, 11(2), 62–90. https://doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v11i2.6650

Aritonang, S. (2024). Literatur Review: Performa Baterai Lithium-ion, Lithium-sulfur, dan Lithium-air sebagai Penggerak UAV Spionase Pertahanan dan Keamanan. Jurnal Rekayasa Material, Manufaktur Dan Energi.

Austin, R. (2010). Unmanned Aircraft Systems: UAVs Design, Development and Deployment. Wiley.

Beard, R. W., & McLain, T. W. (2012). Small Unmanned Aircraft: Theory and Practice. Princeton University Press.

Cao, W., Zhao, C., & Wang, Y. (2020). Thermal behavior and performance degradation of lithium-ion batteries under high discharge rates. Journal of Energy Storage, 27, 101–112.

Chittoor, P. K., Chokkalingam, B., & Mihet-Popa, L. (2021). A Review on UAV Wireless Charging: Fundamentals, Applications, Charging Techniques and Standards. IEEE Access, 9, 69235–69266. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3077041

Hannan, M. A., Hoque, Md. M., Mohamed, A., & Ayob, A. H. (2017). Review of lithium battery storage systems for UAV applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 771–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.171

Jiao, S., Zhang, G., Zhou, M., & Li, G. (2023). A Comprehensive Review of Research Hotspots on Battery Management Systems for UAVs. IEEE Access, 11, 84636–84650. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3301989

Joshi, R., & Pandey, K. (2024). IoT‐Enabled UAV. In Unmanned Aircraft Systems (pp. 93–135). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394230648.ch3

Linden, D., & Reddy, T. B. (2011). Handbook of Batteries. McGraw-Hill.

Nitta, N., Wu, F., Lee, J. T., & Yushin, G. (2015). Li-ion battery materials: Present and future. Materials Today, 18(5), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.040

Pierri, E., Cirillo, V., Vietor, T., & Sorrentino, M. (2021). Adopting a Conversion Design Approach to Maximize the Energy Density of Battery Packs in Electric Vehicles. Energies, 14(7), 1939. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071939

Prasetiyo, E. E., & Irmawan, E. (2021). Rancang bangun indikator parameter baterai untuk pesawat tanpa awak menggunakan sensor MAX471 secara nirkabel. Teknika STTKD, 7(2), 163–173.

Sasane, A., Borkar, S., Majety, P., Singh, S., & Shahane, P. (2024). Optimizing Endurance in Fixed Wing UAVs (pp. 219–229). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1329-5_17

Sornek, K., Augustyn-Nadzieja, J., Rosikoń, I., Łopusiewicz, R., & Łopusiewicz, M. (2025). Status and Development Prospects of Solar-Powered Unmanned Aerial Vehicles—A Literature Review. Energies, 18(8), 1924. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18081924

Suti, A., Di Rito, G., & Mattei, G. (2022). Development and Experimental Validation of Novel Thevenin-Based Hysteretic Models for Li-Po Battery Packs Employed in Fixed-Wing UAVs. Energies, 15(23), 9249. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15239249

Tacconi, R., Raoul Marini, M., Saraceno, M., Luca Foresti, G., Cinque, L., & Mecca, A. (2026). A Comprehensive Taxonomy of UAVs: A Comparative Feature Matrix for Hardware, Capabilities, and Payloads. IEEE Access, 14, 3821–3851. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3642069

Telli, K., Kraa, O., Himeur, Y., Ouamane, A., Boumehraz, M., Atalla, S., & Mansoor, W. (2023). A Comprehensive Review of Recent Research Trends on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). Systems, 11(8), 400. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11080400

Viswanathan, V., Epstein, A. H., Chiang, Y.-M., Takeuchi, E., Bradley, M., Langford, J., & Winter, M. (2022). Author Correction: The challenges and opportunities of battery-powered flight. Nature, 603(7903), E30–E30. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04612-5

Wan Hassan, W. A. Z., & Peter Rogers, R. A. R. (2025). The Evolution of the Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Modern Warfare and Its Multi-Faceted Impact. Jurnal Wacana Sarjana, 9(3), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.17576/jws.v9i3.669

Wanner, D., Hashim, H. A., Srivastava, S., & Steinhauer, A. (2024). UAV avionics safety, certification, accidents, redundancy, integrity, and reliability: a comprehensive review and future trends. Drone Systems and Applications, 12, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1139/dsa-2023-0091

Wicaksono, C. B., Aryadi, W., & Anis, S. (2020). Pengaruh penggunaan fender-frame-drone dan beban terhadap konsumsi arus baterai. Jurnal Inovasi Mesin, 2(1), 8–13.

Xiong, R., Li, L., & Tian, J. (2018). Towards a smarter battery management system: A critical review on battery state of health monitoring methods. Journal of Power Sources, 405, 18–29.

Zhang, Y., Zhang, D., & Wang, L. (2018). Power system optimization for long-endurance UAV. Energy, 154, 504–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.120


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Experimental Comparative Performance Analysis of Li-Po and Li-Ion Batteries Using Telemetry-Based Flight Testing in Fixed-Wing UAV for KRTI LELA Mission

Dimensions Badge
Article History
Published: 2026-03-31
Abstract View: 60 times
PDF Download: 10 times
Issue
Section
Articles