Analisis Kebutuhan dan Minat dalam Pemanfaatan Teknologi Digital di SMK Depok Menggunakan SEM–PLS
-
M Octaviano Pratama
*
UPN Veteran Jakarta, Jakarta,
Indonesia
- Neni Alyani Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri (IPDN) Jatinangor, Sumedang, Indonesia
- M Miftahul Madya PT. Penerbit Gramatikal Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
- Ermatita Ermatita UPN Veteran Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
- Pamela Kareen Universitas Pamulang, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia (*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Pandemi COVID-19 telah mempercepat penerapan teknologi digital dalam pendidikan termasuk di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK), yang menuntut keseimbangan antara pembelajaran teoritis dan praktikal. Namun, setelah pandemi berakhir, muncul pertanyaan mengenai sejauh mana teknologi tersebut tetap relevan dan diterima oleh guru maupun siswa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi penerimaan dan keberlanjutan penggunaan teknologi digital dalam kegiatan belajar mengajar di SMK Kota Depok pasca pandemi. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode structural equation modeling–partial least squares (SEM–PLS) terhadap 99 responden (63 siswa dan 36 guru). Instrumen berupa kuesioner Likert lima poin mencakup lima konstruk utama: komunikasi, kemudahan, efektivitas, biaya, dan minat keberlanjutan. Hasil pengujian reliabilitas menunjukkan nilai Cronbach’s Alpha > 0,70 pada konstruk komunikasi, kemudahan, dan minat, menandakan konsistensi internal yang baik, sementara konstruk efektivitas (0,595) dan biaya (0,491) berada di bawah ambang batas. Uji validitas konvergen menunjukkan Outer Loading > 0,70 pada 73% indikator guru dan 58% indikator siswa. Analisis struktural memperlihatkan bahwa hipotesis tentang keinginan melanjutkan penggunaan teknologi signifikan (p < 0.05), sedangkan hipotesis kesesuaian teknologi dengan kebutuhan hanya didukung sebagian. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa model pembelajaran hibrida menjadi pilihan paling relevan untuk mendukung keberlanjutan pembelajaran digital di SMK.
Downloads
References
Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2023). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 863–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Demir, S., & Uşak, M. (2025). Analyzing the Implementation of PLS-SEM in Educational Technology Research: A Review of the Past 10 Years. SAGE Open, 15(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251345950
Dhera, M. M., Ti’a, E., Lawe, Y. U., & Sego, M. I. S. (2024). Analisis Kebutuhan Siswa serta Kesiapan Belajar Siswa Melalui Pendekatan Berdiferensiasi dalam Pembelajaran pada Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 1(4), 9. https://doi.org/10.47134/pgsd.v1i4.827
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, D. L., Coombs, C., Constantiou, I., Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., Gupta, B., Lal, B., Misra, S., Prashant, P., Raman, R., Rana, N. P., Sharma, S. K., & Upadhyay, N. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on information management research and practice: Transforming education, work and life. International Journal of Information Management, 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102211
Ganesh, D., Justin, P. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092
Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
Huang, C. H. (2021). Using pls-sem model to explore the influencing factors of learning satisfaction in blended learning. Education Sciences, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050249
Ketchen, D. J. (2013). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 184–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.002
Nurhayati, R., Abidin, Y., Kurniawan, D. T. (2024). Pengaruh Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Web Terhadap Hasil Belajar Melalui Peningkatan. 14(2), 512–519.
Panji Yudha, R., & Noza, N. A. (2023). Analisis Faktor Fasilitas Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini dengan Metode Structural Partial Least Square. Jurnal Pelita PAUD, 7(2), 350–358. https://doi.org/10.33222/pelitapaud.v7i2.3005
Pardede, P., & Sunarto. (2020). Persepsi Guru Dan Siswa Terhadap Penggunaan Tik Dalam Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Menengah Di Jakarta Dan Sekitarnya. Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan, 13(3), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.33541/jdp.v13i3.2199
Rahayu, F. S., Budiyanto, D., & Palyama, D. (2017). Analisis Penerimaan E-Learning Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (Tam) (Studi Kasus: Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta). Jurnal Terapan Teknologi Informasi, 1(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.21460/jutei.2017.12.20
Sari, A. P., & Munir, M. (2024). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Digital dalam Inovasi Pembelajaran untuk Meningkatkan Efektivitas Kegiatan di Kelas. Digital Transformation Technology, 4(2), 977–983. https://doi.org/10.47709/digitech.v4i2.5127
Sopbaba, M., Simarmata, J. E., & Klau, K. Y. (2024). Pemodelan Persamaan Struktural Kemampuan Akademik dan Karakteristik Individu dalam Mengidentifikasi Ketertarikan Siswa Kelas XII dalam Memilih Perguruan Tinggi Negeri. Jambura Journal of Probability and Statistics, 5(2), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.37905/jjps.v5i2.24914
Vargor, D., & Ögretmen, T. (2024). Comparison of Covariance-Based Structural Equation Model and Partial Least Squares Equality Models. Research Square, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4991578/v1%0ALicense:
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Wicaksono, D., Wicaksono, D., Suradika, A., Winata, W., & Shodiq, N. A. (2021). Pengembangan Model Kurikulum Digital dan Pembelajaran Berbasis Virtual Set Adaptif di SMK Atlantis Depok. Instruksional, 3(1), 40–49. https://jurnal.umj.ac.id/index.php/instruksional/article/view/10435
Zengin, E. (2023). Perceptions of Classroom Teachers on the Concept of “Technology” and the Effect of Schools’ Technological Infrastructure on the Educational Process: A Qualitative Study. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.52380/mojet.2023.11.1.455
Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Yang, L., & Wang, C. (2020). Suspending Classes Without Stopping Learning: China’s Education Emergency Management Policy in the COVID-19 Outbreak. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13030055
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Analisis Kebutuhan dan Minat dalam Pemanfaatan Teknologi Digital di SMK Depok Menggunakan SEM–PLS
Pages: 635-643
Copyright (c) 2025 M Octaviano Pratama, Neni Alyani, M Miftahul Madya, Ermatita Ermatita, Pamela Kareen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
