Problematika Penerapan Pasal 116 UU Peratun Terhadap Pelaksanaan Putusan PTUN
Abstract
The State Administrative Court is one of the courts in Indonesia, which one of the tasks is to resolve cases in the field of state administration. The results of each deliberate settlement in court give rise to something that is mutually agreed upon by the judges, namely the so-called Court Decision. In contrast to court decisions from other courts such as the General Courts, Military Courts and Religious Courts, the State Administrative Court still has shortcomings in the process of implementing court decisions. This is because what is disputed is that it relates to decisions issued by state administrative officials, which in this case in Indonesia does not yet have an excess system of institutions which forces state administrative officials to re-make state administrative decisions in accordance with the provisions in court decisions. This study uses Normative Law research with a statutory approach. The results of this research are to describe the first, regarding the formulation of Article 116 which is contained in the Law on Administrative Courts, Second regarding the Problems with the Application of Article 116 of the Law on State Administrative Courts related to the implementation of court decisions
Downloads
References
Jhony Ibrahim. 2006. Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Banyumedia Publishing.
Paulus Efendi Lotulung. 2013. Hukum Tata Usaha Negara Dan Kekuasaan. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Paulus Effendi Lotulung. 2013. Lintasan Sejarah dan Gerak Dinamika Peradilan Tata Usaha (PERATUN). Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Phillipus M. Hadjon. 1993. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia (Introduction The Indonesian Administration Law). Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Roihan A. Rasyid. 2001. Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Rozali Abdullah. 2005. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Us¬aha Negara. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
SF Marbun. 2004. Dimensi-Dimensi Pemikiran Hukum Administrasi Negara. Yogyakarta: UII Press.
Sudikno Mertokusumo. 1981. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Udiyo Basuki. 2013. Pedoman Beracara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Yogyakarta: Suka Press.
Victor Situmorang dan Soedibyo. 1987. Pokok-Pokok Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
Markus Zimmer dkk. 2009. International Journal for Court Adminitration. International Association for Court Administration. Number 1 Vol. 2.
Hendrik Salmon. 2010. Eksistensi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN) dalam Mewujudkan Suatu Pemerintahan yang Baik. Jurnal Sasi Nomor 4 Vol. 16
Ridwan. 2002. Beberapa Catatan tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum. No. 20 Vol. 9.
Purwanto, A., Sunarsi, D., & Wijoyo, H. (2020). Penerapan Perluasan Arti Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Dalam Pelaksanaan UU 29 Tahun 2004 (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 625/PDT. G/2014/PN JKT. BRT). TIN: Terapan Informatika Nusantara, 1(2), 99-103.
Sergio Lopelez Ayllon dkk. 2015. A Comparative-Empirical Analysis of Administrative Coutrs in Mexico. Mexican Review Law. Number 2 Vol. VII.
Uwaisyah Rani. 2014. Urgensi Upaya Paksa Dalam Pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. JOM Fakultas Hukum Nomor 2 Volume I.
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara sebagaimana telah diubah menjadi Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2004 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Problematika Penerapan Pasal 116 UU Peratun Terhadap Pelaksanaan Putusan PTUN
Pages: 300-304
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).













