Komparasi Efektivitas PCC dan ECMP pada Arsitektur Multi-ISP Heterogen Ditinjau dari Parameter Quality of Services (QoS)
- Reza Dwi Cahya Kurniawan Universitas Muhammadiyah Tegal, Tegal, Indonesia
-
Riska Wibowo
*
Universitas Muhammadiyah Tegal, Tegal,
Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Fast and stable internet access is essential to support academic and administrative activities at Universitas Muhammadiyah Tegal. To overcome bandwidth fluctuations and ensure optimal connectivity, implementing a multi-ISP load balancing system is required. This study aims to compare the performance of Per Connection Classifier (PCC) and Equal-Cost Multi-Path (ECMP) load balancing algorithms based on TIPHON Quality of Service (QoS) standards at Universitas Muhammadiyah Tegal. The methodology utilizes a quantitative experimental approach on a MikroTik router with a dual-WAN configuration (2 ISPs × 100 Mbps). Testing was conducted over 7 days during peak hours (08:00–16:00 WIB) using iPerf3 for traffic injection and Wireshark for packet analysis. Quantitative results reveal that the PCC algorithm achieves superior performance across all QoS parameters, recording a throughput of 194.8 Mbps (97.4% efficiency), a delay of 28.5 ms, a jitter of 3.4 ms, and a packet loss of 0.3%. In contrast, ECMP produced a jitter of 11.6 ms and a packet loss of 2.8%, triggering session drops on critical services. PCC’s advantage is driven by its session locking mechanism via precise mangle rules, effectively mitigating bufferbloat and hash collisions. Based on a comprehensive evaluation of throughput, delay, jitter, and packet loss, the PCC algorithm is objectively superior and strongly recommended for implementation at Universitas Muhammadiyah Tegal.
Downloads
References
Al-Hamda, V., Vita Via, Y., & Endah Wahanani, H. (2025). Analisis Perbandingan Performasi Antara Mentode PCC (Per Connection Classifier) Dengan ECMP (Equal Cost Multi-Path) Pada Jaringan Akses Internet Menggunakan Mikrotik Router OS. Dalam Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknik Informatika) (Vol. 9, Nomor 4).
Al-Khaffaf, D. A. J., & Al-Hamiri, M. G. (2021). Performance evaluation of campus network involving VLAN and broadband multimedia wireless networks using OPNET modeler. Telkomnika (Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control), 19(5), 1490–1497. https://doi.org/10.12928/TELKOMNIKA.v19i5.18531
Arifin, S., Nugraha, A. W., Mukti, F. S., & Jatmika, S. (2024). MQTT Broker Optimization: Comparative Analysis of Round Robin and Least Response Time. Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro, 13(3), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.25077/jnte.v13n3.1260.2024
Aulina, N., & Alamin, M. M. (2025). Implementation of Internet Network Load Balancing at the Faculty of Computer Science UNUSIDA Using the ECMP Method. JEECS (Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences), 10(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.54732/jeecs.v10i1.7
Frihadi, A., Windasari, S., Bagaskoro, B., Dama, M., & Rotib, A. A. (2025). Analisis Performa Load Balancing Menggunakan PCC Method pada MikroTik Router (Vol. 2, Nomor 1).
Indriyanta, G., Haryono, N. A., & Situmeang, J. G. (t.t.). Analisis Kinerja Load Balancing PCC dan ECMP Dalam Menerapkan Pembagian Bandwidth Pada Beberapa Jalur Jaringan. https://doi.org/10.47002/seminastika.v5i1.628
Iqbal, M., Anwar, R., & Priyawati, D. (t.t.). SISTEMASI: Jurnal Sistem Informasi Comparative Analysis of PCC and ECMP Methods in Load Balancing using GNS3 Simulator. Diambil http://sistemasi.ftik.unisi.ac.id
Jiyan Suhada, & Hari Setyawan. (2026). Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Metode Load Balancing Per Connection Classifier dan Equal Cost Multi Path pada Jaringan Internet. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan, 4(3), 19991–20000. https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v4i3.5322
Mirsal, D., Agtriadi, H. B., & Info, A. (2026). Comparative Analysis of PCC Load Balancing and Quality of Service (QoS) Queue Tree Methods on Mikrotik for Bandwidth Optimization Published by Politeknik Piksi Ganesha Indonesia. 10(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.37339/e-komtek.v10i1.3170
Novianto, D., Tommy, L., & Setiawan Japriadi, Y. (2021). Implementation of a Network Security System Using the Simple Port Knocking Method on a Mikrotik-Based Router Implementasi Sistem Keamanan Jaringan Menggunakan Metode Simple Port Knocking Pada Router Berbasis Mikrotik. JURNAL KOMITEK, 1(2), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.53697/jkomitek.v1i2
Nugroho, K. T., Julianto, B., Tisna, D. R., & Nur M S, D. F. (2023). Quality Analysis of Service Load Balancing Using PCC, ECMP, and NTH Methods. Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Teknik Informatika (JANAPATI), 12(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.23887/janapati.v12i1.55894
Octavriana, T., Joni, K., & Ibadillah, A. F. (2021). Optimalisasi Jaringan Internet Dengan Load Balancing Pada High Traffic Network. Jurnal Teknik Informatika, 14(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.15408/jti.v14i1.15018
Pakiding, R., Iswahyudi, C., Yanwastika Ariyana, R., Informatika, J., Sains, I., AKPRIND Yogyakarta Jl Kalisahak No, T., & Balapan, K. (2021). Simulasi Perbandingan Load Balancing Dengan Metode PCC, ECMP, dan NTH Menggunakan GNS3 (Vol. 09, Nomor 01).
Rifki Alkatiri, Erwin Gunawan, & Santosa M. (2021). Analisis Perbandingan Metode Load Balancing PCC dan ECMP Menggunakan Mikrotik Hap Late Rb941. Jurnal Teknik Informatika, 4.
Setiawan Putra, R., & Razaq, J. A. (2025). Penerapan Load Balance Pcc Dan Ecmp Dalam Penggunaan Akses Jaringan Internet Setiap Hari Implementation Of Pcc And Ecmp Load Balance In Daily Internet Network Access Usage. Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science (INTECOMS), 8(5).
Tanenbaum, A. S., & Wetherall, D. J. (2021). Computer Networks (6th ed.) (Pearson Education, Ed.).
Tantoni, A., Zaen, M. T. A., & Mutawalli, L. (2022). Komparasi QoS Load Balancing Pada 4 Line Internet dengan Metode PCC, ECMP dan NTH. Jurnal Media Informatika Budidarma, 6(1), 110. https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v6i1.3436
Taufan, M., Zaen, A., & Tantoni, A. (2023). KLIK: Kajian Ilmiah Informatika dan Komputer Analisis dan Implementasi Pengalihan Trafik Data (Failover) Akses Internet Pada Dua ISP. Media Online, 4(3), 1726–1736. https://doi.org/10.30865/klik.v4i3.1336
W., Yunanri., Fitriana, Y. B., & Surya, R. A. (2024). Analysis And Design of Internet Network Infrastructure With Mikrotik Devices At The Penyaring Village Office Using The NDLC Method. Brilliance: Research of Artificial Intelligence, 3(2), 384–395. https://doi.org/10.47709/brilliance.v3i2.3377
Zhao, Y., Wang, L., & Zhang, H. (2025). Stateful vs. stateless traffic engineering in multi-homed enterprise networks: A comparative review. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 27(2), 1120–1138
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Komparasi Efektivitas PCC dan ECMP pada Arsitektur Multi-ISP Heterogen Ditinjau dari Parameter Quality of Services (QoS)
Pages: 1464-1472
Copyright (c) 2026 Reza Dwi Cahya Kurniawan, Riska Wibowo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
