Analisis Perbandingan Metode WASPAS dan TOPSIS dengan Menggunakan Pembobotan ROC dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Sales Sepeda Motor Terbaik


  • Bernadus Gunawan Sudarsono * Mail Universitas Bung Karno, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Karya Suhada Universitas Sehati Indonesia, Karawang, Indonesia
  • Abdul Karim Universitas Labuhanbatu, Labuhanbatu, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: WASPAS Method; TOPSIS Method; Decision Support System; Sales

Abstract

Determining the best motorcycle salesperson is an important aspect in improving sales performance and motivation in automotive companies. This process must be carried out objectively by considering various criteria, such as performance achievement, discipline, teamwork, communication skills and responsibility. However, decision making is often complex because it involves many factors and varying criteria. Therefore, a Decision Support System (DSS) is needed that is able to process and analyze data effectively. This study aims to analyze the comparison of two multi-criteria methods, namely Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), in determining the best motorcycle salesperson. Both methods use Rank Order Centroid (ROC) weighting to give weight to the assessment criteria. Based on the results of the analysis, it can be seen that both methods provide consistent results, although there are differences in the final ranking. The results of the study indicate that the WASPAS and TOPSIS methods are equally effective in determining the best alternative, with differences in the order of priorities that can be used as further consideration by decision makers. The results of the two methods show that the alternative with the highest performance according to both methods is Febriansyah, who is in first place both in the TOPSIS method with a value of 0.796 and in the WASPAS method with a value of 0.810.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R. T. Aldisa, F. Nugroho, M. Mesran, S. A. Sinaga, and K. Sussolaikah, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Sales Terbaik Menerapkan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” J. Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 548–556, 20s22, doi: 10.47065/josh.v3i4.1955.

A. Daini Udda Siregar and N. Astuti Hasibuan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Sales Marketing Terbaik di PT. Alfa Scorph Menggunakan Metode COPRAS,” J. Sist. Komput. dan Inform. Hal, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 62–68, 2020, doi: 10.30865/json.v2i1.2455.

Arjun Nainggolan, Annisa Siregar, and M. Mesran, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Indeks Kinerja Sales Marketing Menerapkan Metode MOORA,” Hello World J. Ilmu Komput., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 121–129, 2022, doi: 10.56211/helloworld.v1i3.125.

R. Y. Simanullang and M. Mesran, “Penerapan Metode Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) dengan Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid (ROC) Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Terbaik,” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 466–475, 2023.

W. S. Wardana, V. Sihombing, and D. Irmayani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Lokasi Usaha Kuliner,” vol. 4, pp. 151–157, 2021.

R. Y. Simanullang, Melisa, and Mesran, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Bantuan Covid 19 menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting ( SAW ),” 2021.

N. Palasara and T. Baidawi, “Penerapan Metode Topsis Pada Peningkatan Kinerja Karyawan,” 2018.

H. Hertyana, “Sistem pendukung keputusan penentuan karyawan terbaik menggunakan metode topsis,” JITK (Jurnal Ilmu Pengetah. Dan Teknol. Komputer), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 43–48, 2018.

F. HIDAYAH, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelayakan Pemberian Pinjaman Menggunakan Metode Topsis Studi Kasus: Upk Bina Artha Kecamatan Kedung.” UNISNU JEPARA, 2018.

S. Sunardi, R. Umar, and D. S. Nasution, “Analisis Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Menggunakan Metode WASPAS,” JURIKOM (Jurnal Ris. Komputer), vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 697–704, 2022.

Y. Wibisono, H. Sunandar, and S. Adelina Hutabara, “Bulletin of Data Science Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Calon Karyawan Baru Menggunakan Metode Weight Aggregated Sum Product Assesment (WASPAS),” Media Online, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 26–34, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://ejurnal.seminar-id.com/index.php/bulletinds.

H. Hertyana, “Seleksi penerimaan karyawan baru menggunakan metode topsis,” JITK (Jurnal Ilmu Pengetah. Dan Teknol. Komputer), vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 143–148, 2019.

A. Iskandar, “Penerapan Metode TOPSIS Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelayakan Penerima Pinjaman Kredit,” J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 388–396, 2023, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v4i2.2879.

K. Pebriana and F. P. Sihotang, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Agent Terbaik Mengunakan Metode TOPSIS,” J. Teknol. Sist. Inf., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 130–139, 2023, doi: 10.35957/jtsi.v4i1.4604.

R. Y. Simanullang, M. Melisa, and M. Mesran, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Bantuan Covid-19 Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” TIN Terap. Inform. Nusant., vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 451–458, 2021.

Y. P.K.Kelen and S. S. Manek, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Kredit Sepeda Motor Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Pada PT. NSS Cabang Kefamenanu,” J. Ilm. Ilmu Komput., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2019, doi: 10.35329/jiik.v5i2.96.

W. A. Putri, D. Rachmawati, and W. S. Silalahi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan E-Wallet Menggunakan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process-TOPSIS,” MALCOM Indones. J. Mach. Learn. Comput. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 18–27, 2022, doi: 10.57152/malcom.v2i1.160.

P. Fitriani and T. S. Alasi, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dengan Metode WASPAS, COPRAS dan EDAS: Menentukan Judul Skripsi Mahasiswa. Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2020.

N. K. Daulay, “Penerapan Metode Waspas Untuk Efektifitas Pengambilan Keputusan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja,” J. Sist. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 196–201, 2021, doi: 10.30865/json.v2i2.2773.

S. Damanik and D. P. Utomo, “Implementasi Metode ROC (Rank Order Centroid) Dan Waspas Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Kerjasama Vendor,” … Teknol. Inf. dan …, vol. 4, pp. 242–248, 2020, doi: 10.30865/komik.v4i1.2690.

H. Dafitri, N. Wulan, and H. Ritonga, “Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Terbaik Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS dan WASPAS,” JURIKOM (Jurnal Ris. Komputer), vol. 9, no. 5, p. 1313, 2022, doi: 10.30865/jurikom.v9i5.4816.

A. Syaputra, “Kombinasi Metode AHP dan TOPSIS dalam Pemilihan Bibit Sayuran Berdasarkan Kondisi Tanah dan Syarat Tumbuh Tanaman,” J. Ilm. Inform., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 2021, doi: 10.35316/jimi.v6i1.1232.

H. Hasnabila, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN KELAYAKAN PEMBERIAN KREDIT MOTOR MENGGUNAKAN METODE TECHNIQUE FOR OTHERS PREFERENCE BY SIMILARITY TO IDEAL SOLUTION (TOPSIS) PADA FEDERAL INTERNATIONAL FINANCE (FIF GROUP) PASAMAN BARAT.” UNIVERSITAS PUTRA INDONESIA YPTK PADANG, 2022.

T. Prihatin, “Perbandingan Metode TOPSIS Dan SAW Dalam Penentuan Guru Berprestasi,” J. Tek. Komput. AMIK BSI, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 29–34, 2019.

A. Elia, A. Fadilah, M. Fitriani, and P. Suryani, “Perbandingan Metode SMART, SMARTER dan TOPSIS dalam Pemilihan Lokasi Toko Serba Murah Pulau Kijang: Comparison of SMART, SMARTER AND TOPSIS Methods in Selection Location of Serba Murah Store Pulau Kijang,” Malcom Indones. J. Mach. Learn. Comput. Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 170–176, 2021.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Analisis Perbandingan Metode WASPAS dan TOPSIS dengan Menggunakan Pembobotan ROC dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Sales Sepeda Motor Terbaik

Dimensions Badge
Article History
Submitted: 2024-11-08
Published: 2024-11-26
Abstract View: 26 times
PDF Download: 22 times
Section
Articles