Penentuan Desa Terbaik dengan Menerapkan Kombinasi Metode ROC dan SMART
-
R. Siddik Margolang
*
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Medan,
Indonesia
- Muhammad Fakhriza Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia (*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The problem that is used as a reference in this research is the assessment process which still uses the old method, namely by opening pages of documents, so this method takes a lot of time and energy in the assessment process and allows tolerance of values that are similar, making it very difficult to determine the best village. The process of selecting the best village is a very important stage in building a competent and innovative village. The system built using the ROC and SMART methods aims to help data collectors reduce time in data collection and be effective in determining the best villages according to the criteria used. The criteria used are Village Cleanliness (K1), Education (K2), Economy (K3), Security and Order (K4), Role of the PKK (K5), Village Governance (K6) with 7 alternative data samples. Data for this research was collected through interviews and observations at the Rahuning District Office and processed using the ROC and SMART methods for weighting and evaluating decisions. The results of calculations using the ROC and SMART methods found that among the best villages, Gunung Melayu Village was a worthy candidate to become the best village candidate by obtaining a total score of 0.738889.
Downloads
References
M. Alkadafi, S. Tauby, and N. L. Andini, “Pengembangan Kelembagaan Badan Usaha Milik Desa Dalam Menggerakkan Ekonomi Desa di Provinsi Riau,” PUBLIKA J. Ilmu Adm. Publik, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.25299/jiap.2021.vol7(1).6562.
I. Oktaria, “Kombinasi Metode Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) dan Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dalam Pemilihan Kegiatan Ekstrakulikuler,” J. Ilm. Inform. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2023, doi: 10.58602/jima-ilkom.v2i1.12.
I Made Arya Budhi Saputra, “Penentuan Lokasi Stup Menggunakan Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dan Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” J. Sist. dan Inform., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 48–53, 2020, doi: 10.30864/jsi.v15i1.340.
R. R. Oprasto, “Decision Support System for Selecting the Best Raw Material Supplier Using Simple Multi Attribute Rating Method Technique,” J. Ilm. Comput. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10–18, 2023, doi: 10.58602/jics.v2i1.12.
H. Irman Santoso, “Seleksi Penerimaan Programmer Menggunakan Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique Method (SMART Method) dan Rank Order Centroid,” J. Inf. Technol. Softw. Eng. Comput. Sci. (ITSECS, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 31–39, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.58602/itsecs.v2i1.95.
M. Marsono, A. F. Boy, and D. Saripurna, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Menentukan Tingkat Kepuasan Pelanggan Terhadap Pelayanan di Toko Indomaret Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Associative Memory (FAM),” J. Teknol. Sist. Inf. dan Sist. Komput. TGD, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 78–85, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.53513/jsk.v3i1.198.
A. Masdalena, R. A. Dalimunthe, and E. Saputra, “Implementasi Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekomendasi Ikan Budidaya Berbasis Web,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 663–673, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.47065/bits.v4i2.2044.
R. F. Wahyu, H. Rohayani, V. Y. P. Ardhana, F. Frieyadie, A. Supriyatna, and D. Desyanti, “Kombinasi Metode Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dan Operational Competitiveness Rating Analysis (OCRA) pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Kasir,” Bull. Informatics Data Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 30, 2023, doi: 10.61944/bids.v2i1.61.
A. Simangunsong and R. Hamdani, “Rekomendasi Penentuan Desa Terbaik dengan Kombinasi Metode OWA (Ordered Weighted Avarage) dan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) berbasis Web,” MEANS (Media Inf. Anal. dan Sist., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 99–104, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.54367/means.v5i2.918
N. Harianja, R. Andrianto, and R. I. Nasution, “Implementasi Metode Rank Order Centroid dan Occupational Repetitive Action dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Desa Terbaik ( Studi Kasus : Kabupaten Padang Lawas Utara ),” vol. 8, pp. 33522–33531, 2024.
R. Adrian, G. L. Ginting, and K. Ulfa, “Kombinasi Metode Aras Dan Roc Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Kepala Lab Teknik Komputer Dan Jaringan,” KOMIK (Konferensi Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 391–403, 2022, doi: 10.30865/komik.v6i1.5761.
M. Iqbal, “Penerapan Metode SMART Dan Pembobotan ROC Pada Pemilihan Destinasi Wisata Teraman Di Indonesia,” vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 355–360, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.37859/jf.v14i2.7256.
P. Simanjuntak and R. D. Sianturi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerima Dokter Dirumah Sakit Umum Bhakti Dengan Menerapkan Metode Oreste Dan ROC,” Resolusi Rekayasa Tek. Inform. dan Inf., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 121–127, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.30865/resolusi.v2i3.307.
D. V. Waas, M. D. W. Arsitana, I. P. H. Permana, I. K. Wiratama, and I. G. I. Sudipa, “Group Decision Support System Using SMART-COPELAND SCORE Model In Choosing The Best Alternative Pair,” Telemat. J. Inform. dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 117–132, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.31315/telematika.v19i1.7181.g4430.
G. S. Mahendra et al., Sistem Pendukung Keputusan (Teori dan Penerapannya dalam Berbagai Metode), Ed. I. Jambi: PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia, 2023.
S. P. A. Alkadri and R. W. S. Insani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekomendasi Penerima Bantuan Iuran BPJS Kesehatan Menggunakan Metode ROC dan SMART,” J. FASILKOM, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 496–503, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.37859/jf.v13i3.6271.
J. D. Rajagukguk, M. Mesran, and B. Purba, “Penerapan Kombinasi Metode ROC Dan MAUT Dalam Penentuan Calon Penerima Bantuan UKT Pada Universitas Budi Darma,” J-SAKTI (Jurnal Sains Komput. dan Inform., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1193–1206, 2022, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.30645/j-sakti.v6i2.473.
S. Suryadi et al., “Uji Sensitivitas Metode Pembobotan ROC, SWARA Terhadap Kriteria Karyawan Terbaik Dengan Menggunakan Metode SAW,” J. Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 532–540, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.47065/josh.v3i4.1952.
Ignatius Joko Dewanto, Nur Aziz, and Wahyu Darmawan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Perpanjangan Kontrak Kerja Karyawan dengan Metode SMART,” MAMEN J. Manaj., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 9–21, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.55123/mamen.v2i1.903.
A. Zahara, “Analisis Perbandingan Metode SAW, MOORA, SMART Dalam Pemilihan Calon Mitra Statistik Pada BPS Kabupaten Serdang Bedagai.” Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, 2021.
Suhardi, A. H. Lubis, A. Aprilia, and I. A. Ningrum, “Penerapan Metode Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique pada Pemilihan Cafe Terfavorit,” Sist. Pendukung Keputusan dengan Apl., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2023, doi: 10.55537/spk.v2i1.114.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Penentuan Desa Terbaik dengan Menerapkan Kombinasi Metode ROC dan SMART
Pages: 1097-1107
Copyright (c) 2024 R. Siddik Margolang, Muhammad Fakhriza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
