Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Lokasi Pabrik Baru Menggunakan Metode ROC dan MAUT


  • Muhammad Naufal Rifqi Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Rima Tamara Aldisa * Mail Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: Decision Support Systems; ROC method; MAUT Method; New Factory Location

Abstract

Factories are places where goods and services are mass produced. Factories collect and integrate various resources, such as labor, capital, and machines. Factories have an important role in a country's economy, because they produce goods and services that society needs. Apart from that, factories can also create jobs and improve community welfare. However, factories can also have a negative impact on companies and the environment. Companies that produce goods with certain raw materials must consider the availability of raw materials at the factory location. If raw materials are not available at that location, the company must bring them in from other locations, which can increase production costs. Apart from that, companies must also consider the availability of adequate infrastructure, such as roads, electricity, air and telecommunications. If infrastructure is inadequate, companies have to invest to build it, which can also increase production costs. In this study, the ROC method and the MAUT method were used, the ROC method was used to determine the level of importance of the criteria used in selecting the factory location. The MAUT method is used to rank factory locations. The five criteria used in selecting factory locations are: availability of raw materials, availability of infrastructure, labor costs, transportation costs, and environmental impact. A total of 10 factory locations were selected based on predetermined criteria. The final results show that the best factory location is location E with a final score of 0.682, followed by location H and location F with a final score of 0.619 and 0.453 respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Berelaku, D. C. Mongkau, and D. Moeis, “Analisis Pemilihan Marketplace Terbaik Di Kalangan Remaja Menggunakan Metode Multi-Attribute Utility Theory di Kota Makassar,” Digit. Transform. Technol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 371–379, 2023.

M. A. Abdullah and R. T. Aldisa, “Penerapan Metode MOOSRA Dalam Penentuan Penerimaan Frontliner Menggunakan Pembobotan Metode ROC,” JURIKOM (Jurnal Ris. Komputer), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 330–337, 2023.

S. Sukamto and A. Fitriansyah, “Application of the MAUT Method to Determine Eligibility for Accredited School Libraries,” CESS (Journal Comput. Eng. Syst. Sci., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 384–392.

Mesran and D. P. Indini, “Analisis Dalam Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Content Creator Mahasiswa Terbaik Menerapkan Metode EDAS dan ROC,” J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 912–921, 2023, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v4i4.4093.

A. Rifqi and R. T. Aldisa, “Analisa Perbandingan Metode MAUT dan Metode TOPSIS Dengan Menggunakan Pembobotan ROC Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Calon Kepala Desa,” J. Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1413–1422, 2023.

M. A. Bianto and M. R. Aprillya, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Identifikasi Daerah Potensi Banjir Dengan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory ( Studi Kasus : Kabupaten Lamongan ),” pp. 116–124, 2023.

J. Afriany, K. Tampubolon, and R. Fadillah, “Penerapan Metode TOPSIS Penentuan Pemberian Mikro Faedah Bank Syariah Indonesia (BSI),” TIN Terap. Inform. Nusant., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 129–137, 2021.

R. Fadillah, A. N. Purnama, W. P. Mahardika, and M. Mesran, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Siaran Edukasi di Televisi Menggunakan Metode WASPAS (Weight Aggregated Sum Product Assesment),” JIKTEKS J. Ilmu Komput. dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 8–16, 2023.

I. M. Pandiangan, M. Mesran, R. I. Borman, A. P. Windarto, and S. Setiawansyah, “Implementation of Operational Competitiveness Rating Analysis (OCRA) and Rank Order Centroid (ROC) to Determination of Minimarket Location,” Bull. Informatics Data Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2023.

A. Triayudi, D. Nofrisa, and R. Fadillah, “Penerapan Metode EXPROM II Dalam Menentukan Tempat Wisata Pantai Terbaik,” vol. 5, pp. 337–346, 2023, doi: 10.30865/json.v5i2.6925.

W. K. Murti, A. Triayudi, and M. Mesran, “Penentuan Mahasiswa Berprestasi dengan Menerapkan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT),” J. Sist. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 122–130, 2023.

Z. M. Arini, M. Mesran, and M. Panjaitan, “Implementasi Metode Additive Ratio Assesment (ARAS) Dalam Pemberian Promo Tiket Umroh Pada Member,” J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 997–1007, 2023.

J. H. Lubis and M. Mesran, “Perbandingan Metode TOPSIS dan WASPAS Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pengangkatan Jabatan Manager,” J. Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 64–78, 2023.

F. Nugroho, A. Triayudi, and M. Mesran, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekomendasi Objek Wisata Menerapkan Metode MABAC dan Pembobotan ROC,” J. Sist. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 112–121, 2023.

R. K. Purba, M. Mesran, and R. Syahputra, “Penerapan Metode WASPAS dengan Pembobotan ROC pada Pemilihan Duta Kampus di Universitas Budi Darma,” J. Ilm. Media Sisfo, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 212–227, 2023.

D. H. Ramadan, M. Mesran, and R. Syahputra, “Penerapan Metode MAUT dalam Penentuan Karyawan Berprestasi dengan Pembobotan ROC,” J. Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 34–42, 2023.

M. Mesran, A. Harahap, and F. Nugroho, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Aplikasi Chat Terbaik Dalam Mendukung Pembelajaran Daring di Masa Pandemi Covid Menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory,” J. Sist. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 474–484, 2023.

G. T. Mareti and A. T. Ayunda, “Komparasi Metode Maut dan Moora dalam Pemilihan Sunscreen untuk Kulit Menggunakan Pembobotan ROC,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 553–564, 2023.

I. Oktaria, “Kombinasi Metode Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) dan Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dalam Pemilihan Kegiatan Ekstrakulikuler,” J. Ilm. Inform. Dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2023.

B. Okmarizal and S. Defit, “Implementasi Metode AHP Dan Maut untuk Rekomendasi Produk Tupperware Terlaris,” J. KomtekInfo, pp. 109–115, 2023.

E. Y. Dewasasmita and H. Hendry, “Perbandingan Metode SAW, MAUT, ORESTE, TOPSIS dalam Pendukung Keputusan Pembangunan Supermarket di Kabupaten Pati,” J-SAKTI (Jurnal Sains Komput. dan Inform., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 555–569, 2023.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Lokasi Pabrik Baru Menggunakan Metode ROC dan MAUT

Dimensions Badge
Article History
Submitted: 2024-01-31
Published: 2024-02-20
Abstract View: 766 times
PDF Download: 2145 times
Section
Articles