Perbandingan Metode ARAS dan EDAS dalam Menghasilkan Rekomendasi Layanan Akomodasi Hotel
-
Yerik Afrianto Singgalen
*
Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya, Jakarta,
Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study compares the decision support model Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) and Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) in selecting hotels in Semarang City. Meanwhile, the criterion-setting method adopts the Ranking of Centroid (ROC) to set criteria, determine the priority of criteria, and determine the weight of the criteria values. Comparison of the two algorithms needs to be done to compare the results and test the performance of the two algorithms, when developed into a decision support application to generate hotel service recommendations. Meanwhile, the stages in this research are as follows: data collection stage, using TripAdvisor; data processing stage, using ARAS and EDAS models; and data analysis stage. The results of this study show that the ranking results based on the EDAS method show that A1 occupies the first position with an NSP value of 1,000 and an NSN of 0,983. Furthermore, A3 occupies the second position with an NSP value of 0.707 and an NSN of 0.983. Meanwhile, A2 occupies the third position with an NSP value of 0.311 and an NSN of 0.983. Furthermore, the ARAS method ranking results show that A1 occupies the first position with a Si value of 0.171 and a Ki value of 0.994. Furthermore, A3 occupies the second position with a Si value of 0.169 and a Ki value of 0.984. Meanwhile, A2 occupies the third position with a Si value of 0.167 and a Ki value of 0.970. Based on the comparison of EDAS and ARAS methods, it can be seen that both produce the same alternative ranking where Padma Hotel Semarang ranks first, Aruss Hotel Semarang ranks second, and Tentrem Hotel Semarang ranks third. Thus, it can be seen that EDAS and ARAS methods can produce the best hotel recommendations for travelers by considering ratings and reviews on the TripAdvisor platform.
Downloads
References
Y. A. Singgalen, “Analisis Perbandingan Nilai SAW dan TOPSIS dalam Menentukan,” J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 673–684, 2023, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v4i3.3504.
S. Brata, A. Yudhana, and H. Herman, “Perbandingan Metode Technique For Order By Similarity To Ideal Solution (Topsis) Dan A New Additive Ratio Assessmen (Aras) Dalam Penerapan Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Pada Kl Lazismu,” Techno, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 131–138, 2021, doi: 10.30595/techno.v22i2.8994.
A. Karim, S. Esabella, M. Hidayatullah, and T. Andriani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Aplikasi Bantu Pembelajaran Matematika Menggunakan Metode EDAS,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 4, no. 3, p. 1353−1366, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i3.2494.
H. Priyono, Susliansyah, H. Sumarno, L. Maulida, and F. Indriyani, “Pemilihan Minuman yang Banyak Terjual dengan Metode Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution ( EDAS ),” Remik Ris. dan E-Jurnal Manaj. Inform. Komput., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1428–1438, 2023.
P. Mandarani, H. L. Ramadhan, E. Yulianti, and A. Syahrani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penulis Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dan Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS),” J. Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 686–694, 2022, doi: 10.47065/josh.v3i4.1845.
M. A. Abdullah and R. T. Aldisa, “Penerapan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dengan Menggunakan Metode EDAS Dalam Seleksi Penerimaan Penyiar Radio,” J. Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 2023, doi: 10.47065/josh.v5i1.4393.
N. I. Gumilar and P. W. Setyaningsih, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Suppiler Bahan Baku Digital Printing Dengan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS),” J. Nas. Teknol. Komput., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 252–267, 2023.
S. Hummairoh and A. Fau, “Pemilihan Kepala Lingkungan Terbaik di Kelurahan Menerapkan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS),” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 253–261, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://djournals.com/klik
D. Sari, “Seleksi Pemakalah Terbaik Dalam Acara Seminar Nasional Pada Universitas Budi Darma Medan Dengan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menerapkan Metode Aras Dan Borda,” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 163–171, 2022, doi: 10.30865/klik.v2i5.363.
S. D. Handayani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Mutasi Pegawai Pada Kantor Gubernur Sumatera Utara Dengan Menggunakan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (Aras),” Ilm. Inform. Komputer), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 27–34, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://djournals.com/index.php/klik%7CPage27
I. Melinda, R. D. Respati, and T. D. Sartika, “Pengaruh Atribut Hotel Terhadap Keputusan Tamu Menginap di Jakarta Airport Hotel,” J. WisataMuh, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2021.
G. C. Wijaya and N. W. C. T. Megantari, “Pengaruh Brand Awareness Terhadap Electronic Word of Mouth yang Berimbas pada Keputusan Menginap,” J. Ekon. dan BIsnis, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 354–361, 2023.
K. Maladi and Sofiani, “Pengaruh Harga dan Fasilitas terhadap Keputusan Menginap di Aloft Hotel Jakarta Wahid Hasyim,” J. FAME, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 26–31, 2023.
C. C. Makawowor and Y. F. Dewantara, “Analisis Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keputusan Menginap pada Generasi Milenial di Mercure Jakarta Sabang,” J. Manaj. Perhotelan dan Pariwisata, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 334–341, 2023.
D. Facrureza, “Pengaruh Branding terhadap Keputusan Menginap Tamu di Hotel Pullman Jakarta Central Park,” J. Manaj. Perhotelan dan Pariwisata, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 306–317, 2023.
M. Zullaisyah, S. Wagiu, and O. Singgir, “Pengaruh Harga Dan Promosi Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Pada Waigo Hotel Sorong,” J. Manaj. dan Adm. Bisnis, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 237–251, 2021.
M. Musthofa and A. J. Karsudjono, “Pengaruh Harga dan Promosi Terhadap Keputusan Menginap Konsumen (Studi Kasus di Grand Dafam Q Hotel Banjarbaru),” Al-Kalam, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–18, 2023.
Y. A. Singgalen, “Analisis Sentimen dan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menginap di Hotel Menggunakan Metode CRISP-DM dan SAW,” J. Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1343–1353, 2023, doi: 10.47065/josh.v4i4.3917.
A. R. T. Hamdani, “Pengaruh Produk dan Media Sosial Terhadap Keputusan Menginap Pada Hotel Syariah di Bandung, Jawa Barat,” J. Res. Bus. Tour., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 95–108, 2022, doi: 10.37535/104002220222.
M. L. Juniardi, M. Syahrizal, and Adrial, “Pengaruh Sanitasi Hotel terhadap Kepuasan Tamu di Hotel Golden Tulip Essential Tanggerang,” J. WisataMuh, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2021.
E. Fairliantina and M. N. A. Fachrurrozi, “Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan, Presepsi Harga Dan Lokasi Terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan Di Hotel Indonesia Kempinski Jakarta,” J. Ilm. Multi Disiplin Indones., vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 1278–1285, 2022.
R. Mustafa and P. Y. Setiawan, “Pengaruh Kewajaran Harga, Kualitas Produk, dan Lokasi Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian,” E-Jurnal Manaj., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 927–947, 2022.
P. Fitriani and T. S. Alasi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dengan Metode WASPAS, COPRAS, dan EDAS : Menentukan Judul Skripsi,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1051–1061, 2020, doi: 10.30865/mib.v4i4.2431.
A. Supriatna, D. Dedih, and Y. Yanitasari, “Pemilihan Departemen Terbaik dengan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment,” Ilk. J. Ilm., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 228–235, 2020, doi: 10.33096/ilkom.v12i3.679.228-235.
A. Iskandar, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelayakan Penerima Bantuan Dana KIP Kuliah Menggunakan Metode ROC-EDAS,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 856–864, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i2.2265.
S. K. Zega, A. S. Harahap, H. H. Sihite, and I. Saputra, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Aplikasi Nobar Online Terbaik Dengan Menerapkan Metode EDAS Dengan Pembobotan ROC,” KOMIK (Konferensi Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 809–818, 2022, doi: 10.30865/komik.v6i1.5774.
N. L. Saragi, R. A. A. Saragih, A. N. Halawa, and E. Bu’ulolo, “Penerapan Metode EDAS Dan Pembobotan ROC Rekomendasi Susu Formula Untuk Bayi Alergi Susu Sapi,” KOMIK (Konferensi Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 791–800, 2022, doi: 10.30865/komik.v6i1.5768.
Suharti and D. Putro Utomo, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelayakan Penerima Bantuan Tanah Garapan Pada Desa Trans Aliaga Ujung Batu Iii Dengan Metode Distance From Average Solution ( EDAS ),” Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komput., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 43–55, 2021, doi: 10.30865/komik.v5i1.3647.
C. S. Suriady, L. P. Dewi, and A. Setiawan, “Aplikasi Human Resource Information System dengan Fitur Sistem Pendukung Keputusan (Studi Kasus PT. Industri Kreatif Digital),” J. Infra, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 314–319, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://publication.petra.ac.id/index.php/teknik-informatika/article/view/11466%0Ahttps://publication.petra.ac.id/index.php/teknik-informatika/article/download/11466/10076
A. R. Afandhi, P. A. R. Devi, and H. Rosyid, “Penentuan Siswa Berprestasi Kelas Bahasa di SMA ‘EFG’ Menggunakan Metode EDAS,” Antivirus J. Ilm. Tek. Inform., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 39–51, 2022.
R. Styawan and J. Riyanto, “Implementasi Metode (Additive Ratio Assessment) ARAS Pada Sistem Keputusan Kenaikan Jabatan di BCA Goldenpoint Center,” J. E-Bisnis, Sist. Informasi, Teknol. Inf. ESIT, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 30–35, 2023.
C. Maulana, A. Hendrawan, and A. P. R. Pinem, “Pemodelan Penentuan Kredit Simpan Pinjam Menggunakan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS),” J. Pengemb. Rekayasa dan Teknol., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 7–11, 2019, doi: 10.26623/jprt.v15i1.1483.
M. A. Hasmi, M. Mesran, and B. Nadeak, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Instruktur Fitness Menerapkan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) (Studi Kasus : Vizta Gym Medan),” KOMIK (Konferensi Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 121–129, 2018, doi: 10.30865/komik.v2i1.918.
L. C. L. Gaol and N. A. Hasibuan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Team Leader Shift Terbaik Dengan Menggunakan Metode Aras Studi Kasus PT Anugrah Busana Indah,” Inf. dan Teknol. Ilm., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 16–22, 2018.
A. P. R. Pinem, T. Handayani, and L. M. Huizen, “Komparasi Metode ELECTRE, SMART, dan ARAS dalam Penentuan Prioritas Renaksi Pasca Bencana Alam,” J. RESTI, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 109–116, 2020.
P. Fitriani and T. S. Alasi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Menentukan Judul Skripsi Mahasiswa dengan Metode WASPAS, COPRAS, dan EDAS Berdasarkan Penilaian Dosen,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1051–1061, 2020, doi: 10.30865/mib.v4i4.2431.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Perbandingan Metode ARAS dan EDAS dalam Menghasilkan Rekomendasi Layanan Akomodasi Hotel
Pages: 155-164
Copyright (c) 2023 Yerik Afrianto Singgalen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
