Student Ranking Based on Learning Assessment Using the Simplified PIPRECIA Method and CoCoSo Method
- Sitna Hajar Hadad Akademi Ilmu Komputer Ternate, Ternate, Indonesia
- Dedi Darwis Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia, Lampung, Indonesia
- Arie Qurania Universitas Pakuan, Bogor, Indonesia
- Ahmad Ari Aldino Monash University, Victoria, Australia
- Abhishek R Mehta Parul University, Gujarat, India
- Yuri Rahmanto Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia, Lampung, Indonesia
-
Setiawansyah Setiawansyah
*
Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia, Lampung,
Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The problems that occur in determining the best students based on the learning process of the assessment process are still based on the academic scores of students and have not considered the learning process carried out by students. This study aims to apply the Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method in ranking students based on learning assessment using criteria of academic progress, problem-solving ability, mastery of skills, independence, motivation and positive attitude, adaptability, and for weighting the criteria used to apply the Simplified PIPRECIA (Pivot Pairwise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment) weighting method. The Simplified PIPRECIA method is particularly useful in situations where there are diverse criteria to be considered and complex decisions must be made taking into account the preferences and interests of various stakeholders. The Combined Compromise Solution Method is useful when there are conflicts in various criteria that need to be considered in the decision-making process. With this approach, each criterion is weighted and carefully calculated, so that the resulting decisions reflect comprehensive considerations that can meet various requirements and constraints. Based on the results of student rankings based on assessments in learning in the table above, rank 1 was obtained by students with Student ID 1211313 with a final grade of 6.487, rank 2 was obtained by students with Student ID 1211316 with a final grade of 6.402, and rank 3 was obtained by students with Student ID 1211314 with a final grade of 5.814.
Downloads
References
F. Qiu et al., “Predicting students’ performance in e-learning using learning process and behaviour data,” Sci. Rep., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 453, 2022.
L. Archambault, H. Leary, and K. Rice, “Pillars of online pedagogy: A framework for teaching in online learning environments,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 178–191, 2022.
P. H. Dos Santos, S. M. Neves, D. O. Sant’Anna, C. H. de Oliveira, and H. D. Carvalho, “The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: An overview of applications,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 212, pp. 119–138, 2019.
S. Xu, T. Yeyao, and M. Shabaz, “Multi-criteria decision making for determining best teaching method using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process,” Soft Comput., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 2795–2807, 2023.
Y. Mao, H. Xie, X. Zhang, F. Hou, and M. Wang, “Study on the Applicable Room Size Dimension of Stratum Ventilation for Heating Based on Multi-Criteria Analytic Hierarchy Process-Entropy Weight Model,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 381, 2023.
M. Tavana, M. Soltanifar, F. J. Santos-Arteaga, and H. Sharafi, “Analytic hierarchy process and data envelopment analysis: A match made in heaven,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 223, p. 119902, 2023.
K.-H. Chang, “Integrating Subjective–Objective Weights Consideration and a Combined Compromise Solution Method for Handling Supplier Selection Issues,” Systems, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 74, 2023.
Z. Wen, H. Liao, A. Mardani, and A. Al-Barakati, “A hesitant fuzzy linguistic combined compromise solution method for multiple criteria decision making,” in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management: Volume 1 13, 2020, pp. 813–821.
P. Rani, J. Ali, R. Krishankumar, A. R. Mishra, F. Cavallaro, and K. S. Ravichandran, “An integrated single-valued neutrosophic combined compromise solution methodology for renewable energy resource selection problem,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 15, p. 4594, 2021.
M. Yazdani, P. Zarate, E. Kazimieras Zavadskas, and Z. Turskis, “A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems,” Manag. Decis., vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 2501–2519, 2019.
F. Jahan, M. Soni, A. Parveen, and M. Waseem, “Application of combined compromise solution method for material selection,” in Advancement in Materials, Manufacturing and Energy Engineering, Vol. I: Select Proceedings of ICAMME 2021, 2022, pp. 379–387.
Q. Q. Qaddoori and H. K. Breesam, “Using the Pivot Pair-Wise Relative Criteria Importance Assessment (PIPRECIA) Method to Determine the Relative Weight of the Factors Affecting Construction Site Safety Performance.,” Int. J. Saf. Secur. Eng., vol. 13, no. 1, 2023.
A. Ulutaş, G. Popovic, D. Stanujkic, D. Karabasevic, E. K. Zavadskas, and Z. Turskis, “A new hybrid MCDM model for personnel selection based on a novel grey PIPRECIA and grey OCRA methods,” Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 10, p. 1698, 2020.
A. Ulutaş, A. Topal, D. Karabasevic, D. Stanujkic, G. Popovic, and F. Smarandache, “Prioritization of logistics risks with plithogenic PIPRECIA method,” in International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2021, pp. 663–670.
L. S. Rakasiswi and M. Badrul, “Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process Untuk Pemilihan Siswa Terbaik,” PROSISKO J. Pengemb. Ris. dan Obs. Sist. Komput., vol. 7, no. 1, 2020.
A. D. Astuti, Khairunnisa Fadhilla Ramdhania, and Dani Yusuf, “Penerapan Metode SAW untuk Pemilihan Siswa Terbaik pada SMPN 266 Jakarta Berbasis Web ,” J. Inform. Inf. Secur., vol. 4, no. 1 SE-Artikel, pp. 49–64, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.31599/jiforty.v4i1.1299.
J. Hutagalung, B. Anwar, and I. Santoso, “Implementasi Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) Untuk Menentukan Siswa Terbaik,” Techno. Com, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 462–474, 2022.
A. A. Aldino, E. D. Pratiwi, Setiawansyah, S. Sintaro, and A. D. Putra, “Comparison Of Market Basket Analysis To Determine Consumer Purchasing Patterns Using Fp-Growth And Apriori Algorithm,” in 2021 International Conference on Computer Science, Information Technology, and Electrical Engineering (ICOMITEE), 2021, pp. 29–34. doi: 10.1109/ICOMITEE53461.2021.9650317.
A. D. Wahyudi, “Penerapan Metode Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) Untuk Penentuan Ketua OSIS,” J. Ilm. Inform. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 33–45, 2022.
H. Sulistiani, F. Wardani, and A. Sulistyawati, “Application of Best First Search Method to Search Nearest Business Partner Location (Case Study: PT Coca Cola Amatil Indonesia, Bandar Lampung),” in 2019 International Conference on Computer Science, Information Technology, and Electrical Engineering (ICOMITEE), 2019, pp. 102–106.
D. A. Megawaty and D. Santia, “Assessment of The Alignment Maturity Level of Business and Information Technology at CV Jaya Technology,” in 2019 International Conference on Computer Science, Information Technology, and Electrical Engineering (ICOMITEE), 2019, pp. 54–58.
M. Yazdani, Z. Wen, H. Liao, A. Banaitis, and Z. Turskis, “A grey combined compromise solution (CoCoSo-G) method for supplier selection in construction management,” 2019.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Student Ranking Based on Learning Assessment Using the Simplified PIPRECIA Method and CoCoSo Method
Pages: 30-39
Copyright (c) 2023 Sitna Hajar Hadad, Dedi Darwis, Arie Qurania, Ahmad Ari Aldino, Abhishek R Mehta, Yuri Rahmanto, Setiawansyah Setiawansyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
