Analisis Perbandingan Nilai SAW dan TOPSIS dalam Menentukan Keputusan Perjalanan Wisata ke Destinasi Wisata Tematik

Yerik Afrianto Singgalen

doi:10.47065/josyc.v4i3.3504

Yerik Afrianto Singgalen * Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya, Jakarta, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47065/josyc.v4i3.3504

Keywords: SAW; TOPSIS; North Halmahera; Tourism; Destination

Abstract

This study aims to process information related to ticket costs, facilities, safety, cleanliness, road access, and mileage using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method and Technique for Other Preferences by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) in the selection of natural tourism destinations, cultural tourism, beach, and marine tourism based on the context of North Halmahera Regency. The weights on each criterion that have been determined in the SAW method are as follows: ticket fee (0.30); facilities (0.30); security (0.30); cleanliness (0.30); access roads (0.30); mileage (0.30). Meanwhile, the weights on each criterion that have been determined according to the degree of importance in the TOPSIS method are as follows: ticket fees (5); facilities (4); security (3); cleanliness (3); access roads (3); mileage (3). Based on the results of the implementation of the SAW method in the selection of thematic tourist destinations, it can be seen that: based on the context of natural and adventure tourism destinations, Telaga Paca (A2) tourist destinations occupy the first position with a value of 0.903333; based on the context of historical and cultural tourist destinations, Hibualamo tourist destinations (B6) observed the first position with a value of 0.975; based on the context of beach and recreation tourism destinations, Pitu Beach tourist destinations (C1) occupy the first position with a value of 0.804167; based on the context of marine tourism destinations in the archipelago, Kumo Island tourist destinations (D2) occupy the first position with a value of 0.946429. Meanwhile, the results of the implementation of the TOPSIS method show that: based on the context of natural and adventure tourism destinations, Telaga Paca (A2) tourist destinations occupy the first position with a value of 0.74523053; based on the context of historical and cultural tourist destinations, Duma Village tourist destinations (B1) observe the first position with a value of 0.86431018; Based on the context of beach and leisure tourism destinations, tourist destinations Tanjung Pilawang (C7) occupies the first position with a value of 0.85054074; based on the context of marine tourism destinations in the archipelago, Magaliho Island tourist destinations (D7) occupy the first position with a value of 0.74142938

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Purwanto, R. A. Saputra, and N. Herlambang, “Implementasi Metode SAW Dalam Pemilihan Tempat Wisata di Kabupaten Kotawaringin Timur,” Progresif J. Ilm. Komput., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 401–410, 2023.

I. Mahendra and A. Suprapto, “Penerapan Metode TOPSIS & SAW Dalam Pemilihan Destinasi Wisata Di Jawa Timur,” INFORMAL Informatics J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 18–25, 2020, doi: 10.19184/isj.v5i1.15311.

Sunarti, “Perbandingan Metode Saw Dan Topsis Dalam Pemilihan Tujuan Wisata Di Jawa Barat,” Techno.Com, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 76–87, 2019, doi: 10.33633/tc.v18i1.2098.

Z. Indra and M. D. Anggara, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Menentukan Lokasi Wisata yang Terekomendasi di Kota Medan dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Berbasis Web,” J. Sist. Inf. dan Sains Teknol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 18–28, 2023.

Minarni, A. Purwanto, R. A. Saputra, and N. Herlambang, “Implementasi Metode SAW Dalam Pemilihan Tempat Wisata di Kabupaten Kotawaringin Timur,” Progresif J. Ilm. Komput., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 401–410, 2023.

Fatimah, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Duta Wisata Pada Dinas Pariwisata Kabupaten Gayo Lues Menggunakan Metode Ahp Dan Topsis,” Inf. dan Teknol. Ilm., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 39–48, 2023.

M. I. Riadillah and A. Meiriza, “Application of the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) Method in Determining Tourist Destinations,” CESS (Journal Comput. Eng. Syst. Sci., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 14–22, 2021, doi: 10.24114/cess.v7i1.26141.

A. J. Ternando, R. Efendi, and E. P. Purwandari, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Pemilihan Penginapan di Kota Bengkulu Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) (Studi Kasus : Kota Bengkulu),” J. Rekursif, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 24–35, 2018.

E. Suharyanto and S. Malinda, “Analisis dan Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Promosi Jabatan dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Berbasis Web Pada PT CITRA MITRA NUSANTARA,” J. E-Bisnis, Sist. Informasi, Teknol. Inf. ESIT, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39–48, 2023.

E. Suryadi and A. Yani, “Penerapan Metode TOPSIS Pemilihan Sosial Media Marketing Untuk Penjualan Aksesoris Pariwisata Lombok,” JATISI (Jurnal Tek. Inform. dan Sist. Informasi), vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 429–440, 2020, doi: 10.35957/jatisi.v7i3.545.

A. Hermawan and Evan, “Hotel Recommendation System Using SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) And TOPSIS (The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) Method,” bit-Tech, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 129–143, 2019, doi: 10.32877/bt.v1i3.71.

K. Yamagishi et al., “Evaluating the destination management performance of small islands with the fuzzy best-worst method and fuzzy simple additive weighting,” Curr. Issues Tour., vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1224–1253, 2022, doi: 10.1080/13683500.2022.2054404.

K. Yamagishi and L. Ocampo, “Utilizing TOPSIS-Sort for sorting tourist sites for perceived COVID-19 exposure,” Curr. Issues Tour., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 168–178, 2022, doi: 10.1080/13683500.2021.1918070.

J. Moosivand and B. M. Farahani, “Analysing the Relationship Between Urban Infrastructure and Attracting Urban Tourists by Using TOPSIS and AHP Models,” Tour. Plan. Dev., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 467–479, 2013, doi: 10.1080/21568316.2013.815268.

T. Prihatin and R. L. Andharsaputri, “Implementasi Metode AHP dan SAW dalam Penentuan Tenaga Pengajar Les Terfavorit,” Teknika, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2023.

M. F. Adzaki, Y. Ramadhani, and A. Fadli, “Penerapan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process ( AHP ) Untuk Memilih Desa Sebagai Lokasi Kuliah Kerja Nyata,” J. Pendidik. dan Teknol. Indones., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 117–124, 2023.

H. S. Pakpahan, Y. Basani, and N. Shadrina, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Objek Wisata Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product dan Simple Additive Weighting,” Inform. Mulawarman J. Ilm. Ilmu Komput., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2023, doi: 10.35508/jicon.v9i1.3835.

F. Wavi and Y. Huda, “Penerapan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Backward Chaining Pada Aplikasi Web Mandeh Traveling Pada Kawasan Mandeh Berbasis Framework Codeigniter,” J. Pendidik. Tambusai, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 9820–9845, 2021.

E. Zuraidah and L. Marlinda, “System Penunjang Keputusan Pemilihan Tempat Wisata Lombok Menggunakan Metode Preference Rangking Organization For Enrichman Evaluation (PROMETHEE),” J. Tek. Komput., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 223–226, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/jtk/article/view/2600

R. Vincentius and A. Hermawan, “Perancangan Aplikasi Social Network Travellers menggunakan Metode Electre,” J. Inform. dan Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2020, doi: 10.36499/jinrpl.v2i1.2777.

Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Analisis Perbandingan Nilai SAW dan TOPSIS dalam Menentukan Keputusan Perjalanan Wisata ke Destinasi Wisata Tematik