Penggunaan Metode AHP dalam pemilihan Jenis Promosi Kampus Berdasarkan Lokasi Sekolah


  • Indriaturrahmi Indriaturrahmi * Mail Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Mataram, Indonesia
  • Andris Faesal Universitas Bumi Gora, Mataram, Indonesia
  • Angan Febriana Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Mataram, Indonesia
  • M. Citra Satria Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Mataram, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: Promotion; Type of Promotion; School Location; Campus; AHP

Abstract

Basically promotion is carried out to introduce goods or services to the consumer community so that they feel interested and interested in buying or using the products and services offered. As for the campus, promotion is carried out not only to introduce the campus environment, but also to maintain its existence in society. The problems encountered related to campus promotion include determining the type of campus promotion based on the area or school location which is still carried out randomly, so it is difficult to determine the right type of promotion based on the location of the promotion objective. The purpose of this research is to determine what type of campus promotion is best in each region based on the location of the school using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) calculation method. The results of this study indicate that the selection of criteria consists of two types, namely the criteria for school location and type of promotion and based on the results of campus management decisions and student historical data. The calculation results show that the average results for each area of ​​social media and partnership presentations are the highest with a value of 60%, and for visits to schools by 20%, and for the use of billboards by 20%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

B. Ravindranath, Decision Support Systems and Data Warehouses. New Delhi: K.k. Gupta for New Age International (P) Ltd, 2003.

and P. S. Djarwanto, Pangestu Subagyo, Statistik induktif, 1 ed. Yogyakarta: BPFE, 1996.

M. Efraim, Turban; Jay E, Aronson; Ting-Peng, Liang; Richard, “Decision support systems and intelligent systems Edisi Bahasa Indonesia,” in 7, 7 ed., Pearson/Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2005, hal. 936.

Tim Undikma, “Sejarah singkat Undikma,” undikma.ac.id, 2022. https://neo.undikma.ac.id/sejarah-singkat-undikma (diakses Nov 20, 2022).

I. Zufria, “PENENTUAN POTENSI LOKASI PROMOSI CALON MAHASISWA BARU PERGURUAN TINGGI SWASTA BERBASIS AHP (ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS),” J. Islam. Sci. Technol., vol. 3, no. 1, 2018.

J. Sinaga dan B. Sinaga, “Sistem pendukung keputusan penentuan strategi promosi stmik pelita nusantara menggunakan metode AHP,” SAINTEK (Jurnal Sains dan Teknol., vol. 1, no. 1, hal. 58–62, 2019.

H. Gunawan, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN MEMILIH JURUSAN DI PERGURUAN TINGGI MENGGUNAKAN METODE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) Hendra,” J. Inf., vol. XI, no. 1, hal. 1–17, 2019.

M. N. A. Julianto Lemantara, Noor Akhmad Setiawan, “Rancang Bangun Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Mahasiswa Berprestasi Menggunakan Metode AHP dan Promethee,” Jnteti, vol. 2, no. 4, hal. 20–28, 2013.

N. Ryzka Ade Novi Andika, Ridha Ferdhiana, “PEMILIHAN PERUSAHAAN SEBAGAI TEMPAT BEKERJA MENGGUNAKAN METODE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP),” hal. 1–3, 2012.

A. Faesal, S. Fauziati, dan I. Soesanti, “Dss Untuk Penilaian Dosen Dengan Metode AHP Dan TOPSIS,” Semin. Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komun. Terap., vol. 5, hal. 129–134, 2015.

A. Faesal, S. Fauziati, dan I. Soesanti, “Implementasi Metode AHP dan TOPSIS untuk menentukan Mutu Dosen,” Semin. Nas. TIK dan Ilmu Sos., hal. 7–13, 2017.

S. Ye, H. Tang, H. Chen, dan H. Zhu, “Stability evaluation of rockfall based on AHP-fuzzy method,” Proc. - 2010 7th Int. Conf. Fuzzy Syst. Knowl. Discov. FSKD 2010, vol. 3, no. Fskd, hal. 1369–1373, 2010, doi: 10.1109/FSKD.2010.5569089.

Promosi (Def.1)(n.d), “Dalam Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI) Online.” https://kbbi.web.id/promosi (diakses Okt 12, 2020).

Kusrini, Konsep Dan Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan, 1 ed. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset, 2007.

N. G. Khodashahri dan M. M. H. Sarabi, “Decision Support System ( DSS ),” Singaporean J. Bus. , Econ. Manag. Stud., vol. 1, no. 6, hal. 95–102, 2013, doi: 10.12816/0003780.

Indriaturrahmi dan F. Farida, “Rancang Bangun Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Potensi Promosi Calon Mahasiswa Baru Studi Kasus Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika Designing of Decision Support System for Potential Promotion of New Student Candidates : Case Study at Universitas Pendidikan Manda,” Matrik J. Manajemen, Tek. Inform. dan Rekayasa Komput., vol. 20, no. 2, hal. 397–406, 2021, doi: 10.30812/matrik.v20i2.1049.

J. Raymond McLeod dan S. Geoorge P, Management Information System, 10 ed. New Jersey: Salemba Empat, 2007.

L. G. Saaty, T.L. dan Vargas, Decision Making With The Analytic Network Process. United States of America: Springer, 2006.

T. L. dan Saaty, “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process,” Int. J. Serv. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, hal. 83–97, 2008, doi: 10.1108/JMTM-03-2014-0020.

T. L. Saaty, Pengambilan Keputusan Bagi Para Pemimpin, Proses Hirarki Analitik untuk Pengambilan Keputusan dalam Situasi yang Kompleks. Pustaka Binama Pressindo, 1993.

H. Saputra, “PENGARUH HARGA DAN PROMOSI TERHADAP MINAT KONSUMEN (STUDI PADA PT. SAMUDRANESIA TOUR AND TRAVEL PEKANBARU),” ISOQUANT J. Ekon. Manaj. dan Akunt., vol. 2, no. 2, hal. 37, 2018, doi: 10.24269/iso.v2i2.196.

Kusrini, Kusrini. 2007. Konsep Dan Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Yogyakarta: ANDI offset., vol. 67, no. 6. 2007.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Penggunaan Metode AHP dalam pemilihan Jenis Promosi Kampus Berdasarkan Lokasi Sekolah

Dimensions Badge
Article History
Submitted: 2022-11-21
Published: 2022-12-06
Abstract View: 352 times
PDF Download: 344 times
Section
Articles