Penerapan Metode Pembobotan ROC Dan Metode WASPAS Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Pemilihan Penerima Bantuan UKT


  • Dito Putro Utomo Universitas Budi Darma, Medan, Indonesia
  • Guidio Leonarde Ginting * Mail Universitas Budi Darma, Medan, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: Help; ROC; Decision Support System; UKT; WASPAS

Abstract

The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic that is felt by the community is the paralysis of all daily activities. As a result, the cessation of work for a long time causes the company's economy to cripple and results in many companies losing money and making Termination of Employment (PHK) for employees or employees. For the heads of families, the termination of employment (PHK) experienced, of course, has a fairly heavy impact. There are many bad impacts caused by Termination of Employment (PHK) such as not being able to continue education for children, especially in college due to not being able to pay tuition fees every semester. Therefore, to overcome this problem, the government created a Single Tuition Assistance (UKT) program. However, the UKT assistance provided by the government was not able to cover all the financing needs for students who were affected by the Covid-19 pandemic. Limiting quotas for recipients of Resident Tuition (UKT) assistance for Budi Darma University is a new problem, of course. Decision Support System is a computerized system on a computer that is used to support decision making in organizations. The Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) method is a combined method consisting of the WP method and the SAW method, the WASPAS method is expected to provide better results in helping to determine the decision support system. To support obtaining optimal and objective results, a weighting method is needed, namely the ROC method. Based on the above discussion, the research that will be carried out is to select students who receive Single Tuition (UKT) assistance. The results showed that the four alternatives with the highest preference scores received UKT assistance, namely A6, A5, A4, A3

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

T. H. B. Aviani and A. T. Hidayat, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Pemberian Uang Kuliah Tunggal Menerapkan Metode WASPAS,” J. Sist. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 102–109, 2020, doi: 10.30865/json.v2i1.2482.

A. Baskoro and M. Kamisutara, “Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Bantuan UKT / SPP Mahasiswa dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process ( AHP ) pada Perguruan Tinggi,” J. Keilmuan dan Apl. Tek. Inform., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 17–25, 2021.

B. I. Libing, D. M. Sihotang, and M. Boru, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Uang Kuliah Tunggal Kepada Mahasiswa Baru Di Universitas Nusa Cendana Menggunakan Metode Technique for Order Preference By Similarity To Ideal Solution (Topsis),” J-Icon, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 27–36, 2019.

N. T. L. Toruan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Pembawa Acara Berita Terbaik Menerapkan Metode OCRA,” Bull. Comput. Sci. Res., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 71–78, 2021.

S. K. Simanullang and A. G. Simorangkir, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Calon Karyawan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,” TIN Terap. Inform. Nusant., vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 472–478, 2021.

R. D. Kurniawati and I. Ahmad, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Kelayakan Usaha Mikro Kecil Menengah Dengan Menggunakan Metode Profile Matching Pada Uptd Plut Kumkm Provinsi Lampung,” J. Teknol. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 74–79, 2021.

R. Ristiana and Y. Jumaryadi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Paket Wedding Organizer Menggunakan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting),” J. Sisfokom (Sistem Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 2021, doi: 10.32736/sisfokom.v10i1.946.

B. E. W. Asrul and S. Zuhriyah, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pendistribusian Air Bersih Menggunakan Mobil Tangki pada PDAM Kota Makassar dengan Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS,” J. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 35, 2021, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.2020762630.

U. L. Sari, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Lokasi Pemasangan CCTV dengan Metode MOORA,” in Seminar Nasional Informatika (SENATIKA), 2021, pp. 123–133.

W. G. Pradhana and A. Y. Chandra, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Diskon Asuransi Dengan Metode Smarter,” J. Teknol. Dan Sist. Inf. Bisnis, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 431–441, 2021, doi: 10.47233/jteksis.v3i2.299.

N. Thoyibah, Latipah, and A. Muchayan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Siswa Baru Menggunakan Metode SMART,” J. SISFOKOM (Sistem Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 232–240, 2021, doi: 10.47047/ct.v7i1.6.

Zulkifli, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Beasiswa Berprestasi Pada Perguruan Tinggi Swasta Menerapkan Metode Waspas,” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 106–110, 2021.

N. Silalahi, R. Tambusai, Mesran, Sarwandi, and M. V Siagian, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerima Beasiswa Menerapkan Metode Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment ( WASPAS ),” TIN Terap. Inform. Nusant., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 204–211, 2021.

M. I. Novandri and A. W. Utami, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN KELAYAKAN PEMBERIAN DANA PINJAMAN PADA KARYAWAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE WASPAS (STUDI KASUS CV VANO PUTRA),” JEISBI (Journal Emerg. Inf. Syst. Bus. Intell., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 9–18, 2021.

N. Siregar, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Mr Celebrity And Mrs Celebrity Sumut Dengan Menerapkan Metode WASPAS,” J. Inf. dan Teknol. Ilm., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 105–108, 2021.

P. Simanjuntak and R. D. Sianturi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerima Dokter Dirumah Sakit Umum Bhakti Dengan Menerapkan Metode Oreste Dan ROC,” RESOLUSI Rekayasa Tek. Inform. dan Inf., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 121–127, 2022.

Mayadi, R. W. P. Pamungkas, Azlan, Khairunnisa, and F. T. Waruwu, “Analisis Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Kasi Terbaik Menerapkan Metode OCRA dengan Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid (ROC),” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 393–399, 2021, doi: 10.47065/bits.v3i3.1100.

A. Karim, S. Esabella, Kusmanto, Mesran, and U. Hasanah, “Analisa Penerapan Metode Operational Competitiveness Rating Analysis (OCRA) dan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) Dalam Pemilihan Calon Karyawan Tetap Menerapkan Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid (ROC),” J. MEDIA Inform. BUDIDARMA, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1674–1687, 2021, doi: 10.30865/mib.v5i4.3265.

N. P. Dewa, Ubaidi, and E. Maharani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Sales Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dan Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) Berbasis Web,” Digit. Zo. J. Teknol. Inf. dan Komun., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 172–183, 2021, doi: 10.31849/digitalzone.v12i2.7721.

L. M. Yulyantari and I. P. W. ADH, Manajemen Model Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2019.

D. Nofriansyah and S. Defit, Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2019.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Penerapan Metode Pembobotan ROC Dan Metode WASPAS Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Pemilihan Penerima Bantuan UKT

Dimensions Badge
Article History
Submitted: 2022-07-27
Published: 2023-01-09
Abstract View: 473 times
PDF Download: 577 times
Section
Articles