Dampak Regulasi POJK 51/2017 Terhadap Kualitas Pengungkapan GRI Pada Emiten Sektor Konstruksi
-
Ucok Jimmy
*
Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta,
Indonesia
- Agus Munandar Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta, Indonesia (*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study analyzes the impact of Financial Services Authority Regulation (POJK) Number 51/2017 concerning Sustainable Finance on the conformity of sustainability report disclosures of construction companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) with the 2021 GRI Standards. The research method uses a quantitative method on annual reports and sustainability reports from a sample of state-owned and private construction companies during the 2015–2023 period using a purposive sampling technique. Analysis indicators refer to the main framework of the GRI 2021 which includes economic, environmental, and social dimensions. The results show that POJK 51/2017 plays a significant role as a catalyst in increasing transparency and accountability in sustainability reporting, with a clear trend of increasing GRI indicator disclosures after 2017. However, a clear disparity was found in the depth and consistency of disclosures between state-owned construction companies and private construction companies. State-owned construction companies demonstrated higher levels of compliance and faster adaptation, with an average disclosure score of 58.9 points (46%), driven by strong institutional mandates and regulatory oversight from BP Danantara, BP BUMN, and the Financial Services Authority (OJK). Private construction companies, on the other hand, tended to adapt more slowly, with an average disclosure score of 30.6 points (24%), and their reporting remained primarily compliance-focused, requiring stronger market incentives and investor pressure to achieve full alignment with global standards. The findings of this study confirm the effectiveness of POJK 51/2017, which directs reporting to the 2021 GRI standards. However, internal capacity building, policy harmonization, and a more comprehensive integration of environmental, social, and governance indicators are needed to achieve holistic sustainability reporting in the Indonesian construction sector.
Downloads
References
Adeng Pustikaningsih, Karunia, A. N., Buchori, W. P. M., Septiningdyah Arianisari, Ardhana Reswari Hasna Pratista, & Indarto Waluyo. (2024). The Effect of Stakeholder Pressure on Sustainability Report Exposition. Journal of Vocational Applied Research and Studies, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/jvars.v1i2.807
de Villiers, C., La Torre, M., & Molinari, M. (2022). The Global Reporting Initiative’s (GRI) past, present and future: critical reflections and a research agenda on sustainability reporting (standard-setting). Pacific Accounting Review, 34(5), 728–747. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-02-2022-0034
Erin, O. A., Bamigboye, O. A., & Oyewo, B. (2022). Sustainable development goals (SDG) reporting: an analysis of disclosure. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 12(5), 761–789. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-02-2020-0037
E-Vahdati, S., & Aripin, N. (2023). A Review of Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Research with Sustainability Reporting: 1999-2020 dataset. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 26(2), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.6018/rcsar.468261
GRI. (2022). The GRI Standards Enabling transparency on organizational impacts. Retrieved from www.globalreporting.org
I Dewa Ayu Eka, P., Yudha Asteria Putri, P., & Gusti Ayu Ratih Permata Dewi, I. (2024). Analisis Sustainability Reporting Sebelum dan Sesudah Penerapan Standar Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) 2021. EKOMA : Jurnal Ekonomi, 4(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56799/ekoma.v4i1.6185
Ilori, O., Lawal, C. I., Friday, S. C., Isibor, N. J., & Chukwuma- Eke, E. C. (2023). A Framework for Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Auditing: Bridging Gaps in Global Reporting Standards. International Journal of Social Science Exceptional Research, 2(1), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.54660/ijsser.2023.2.1.231-248
Lasswell, H. D. (1971). The Process and Effects of Mass Communication. The Institute for Religious and Social Studies, 84–99.
Luque-Vílchez, M., Cordazzo, M., Rimmel, G., & Tilt, C. A. (2023). Key aspects of sustainability reporting quality and the future of GRI. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(4), 637–659. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2023-0127
Mutia, K. D. (2025). Analisis Kecukupan POJK 51/2017 Sebagai Kerangka Regulasi PElaporan ESG Pada Emiten Sektor Keuangan Di Indonesia. JURNAL AKTUAL AKUNTANSI BISNIS TERAPAN. Retrieved from https://jurnal.polines.ac.id/index.php/akunbisnis/article/view/6519/109907
Mutiha, A. H. (2022). The Quality of Sustainability Report Disclosure and Firm Value: Further Evidence from Indonesia. 26. MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022083026
Pristi, K. M., & Bandiyono, A. (2024). Tren dan Pola Dalam Adopsi Standar Pelaporan Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Oleh Perusahaan BUMN di Indonesia: Scoping Review Trends and Patterns in Adopting Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards by State-Owned Enterprises in Indonesia: A Scoping Review. Indonesian Accounting Research Journal, 4(3), 305–318. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35313/iarj.v4i3.6110
Sebrina, N., Taqwa, S., Afriyenti, M., & Septiari, D. (2023). Analysis of sustainability reporting quality and corporate social responsibility on companies listed on the Indonesia stock exchange. Cogent Business and Management, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2157975
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2013). Research methods for business : a skill-building approach. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Retrieved from www.wileypluslearningspace.com
Sumarwan, A. (2025). Evolusi ESG Di Dunia Dan Adopsinya Di Indonesia. 70 Tahun Sanata Dharma Menggali Makna Dan Membangun Harapan: Paradigma Keberlanjutan Dan Tantangan Perubahan Iklim, 3, 2025. Retrieved from https://e-conf.usd.ac.id/index.php/usdb
Wanta, D., & Noviantoro, R. (2022). The Effect Of Sustainability Report Disclosure On Company Performance (Empirical Study on Banking Companies Listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange for The Period 2017-2020). Accounting And Finance Research Letters Journal, 2022(1), 8–17. Retrieved from https://journal.privietlab.org/index.php/AFRL/article/view/193
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Dampak Regulasi POJK 51/2017 Terhadap Kualitas Pengungkapan GRI Pada Emiten Sektor Konstruksi
Pages: 86-98
Copyright (c) 2026 Ucok Jimmy, Agus Munandar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
