Determinan Ketimpangan Wilayah di Indonesia Tahun 2012–2022: Pendekatan Analisis Panel Dinamis


  • Rizal Syaifudin * Mail Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Banten, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Salman Alfarisi Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Banten, Indonesia
  • Fitrianingsih Fitrianingsih Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Banten, Indonesia
  • Gabriella Stephanie Regina Putri Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Banten, Indonesia
  • Muhamad Abdul Jabbar Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Banten, Indonesia
  • Adli Malik Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Banten, Indonesia
  • Farah Naili Zulfa Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Banten, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: Regional Inequality; Domestic Direct Investment; Foreign Direct Investment; Human Development Index; Agglomeration; Poverty; Generalized Method of Moment (GMM)

Abstract

The primary purpose of countries, particularly emerging countries, is economic development. Equal economic development in each region of a country is both an aspiration and a problem. Unequal economic development, often known as regional inequality, is an issue in achieving social wellbeing. This research can be used to improve understanding of the factors that drive regional inequality in Indonesia, as well as to develop policy recommendations that the government can apply to minimize inequality in Indonesia. This study employs dynamic panel regression with a cross-section of 33 provinces in Indonesia and a time series of 2012-2022. The method utilized is the Generalized Method of Moment (GMM), which includes the First Different GMM (FD-GMM) and System GMM (SYS-GMM) model approaches, parameter significance tests, model specification tests, bias tests, and model selection. According to the findings of this study, an increase in domestic investment will increase regional inequality by 0.147 percent, reduce regional inequality by 0.775 percent, increase the Human Development Index (HDI) by 0.284 percent, increase agglomeration by 2.602 percent, and increase poverty by 0.146 percent. When all independent factors are held constant, regional inequality decreases by 18.104 percent. Furthermore, the results of this study reveal that all independent variables have a significant impact on regional inequality in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aggarwal, S. C. (2022). Inequality and Inclusive Development: Evidence from Selected Indian States. Indian Journal of Human Development, 16(1), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/09737030221092846

Azim, A. N., Sutjipto, H., & Fahmi Ginanjar, R. A. (2022). Determinan Ketimpangan Pembangunan Ekonomi Antarprovinsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Ilmu Ekonomi, 2(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.23969/jrie.v2i1.23

Dai, F., Liu, H., Zhang, X., & Li, Q. (2022). Does the Equalization of Public Services Effect Regional Disparities in the Ratio of Investment to Consumption? Evidence From Provincial Level in China. SAGE Open, 12(1), 215824402210850. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221085007

Gardiner, B., Fingleton, B., & Martin, R. (2020). Regional Disparities in Labour Productivity and The Role of Capital Stock. National Institute Economic Review, 253, R29–R43. https://doi.org/10.1017/nie.2020.28

Hadju, I. I., & Masinambow, V. A. J. (2021). Analisis Ketimpangan Pembangunan Wilayah di Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. 21(01).

Hidayat, M., Darwin, R., & Hadi, M. F. (2020). Does Energy Infrastructure Reduce Inequality Inter-Regional in Riau Province, Indonesia? International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(1), 160–164. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.8658

Iammarino, S., Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Storper, M. (2019). Regional inequality in Europe: Evidence, theory and policy implications. Journal of Economic Geography, 19(2), 273–298. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lby021

Juanda, B. (2021). Model Data Panel Dinamis. Pengolahan Data Panel dengan STATA Model Data Panel Dinamis, 3(2), 69–88.

Liu, D. (2021). Is China’s Economic Growth Profit-Led Or Wage-Led? A Re-Estimation Incorporating Investment Nonlinearity, Sectoral Change, and Regional Disparity. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 44(1), 143–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2020.1848436

Mansyur, K. (2021). Analisis Pengaruh Pertumbuhan Ekonomi, Investasi dan Pengeluaran Pemerintah Terhadap Ketimpangan Pembangunan Wilayah Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. . . p., 1(2).

Mardhian, D., Yulianita, A., & Mukhlis, M. (2023). Ketimpangan dan Prospek Perekonomian di Pulau Sumatera. Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis. https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v5i3.612

Muhammadinah, M. (2023). Ketimpangan Pembangunan di Pulau Sulawesi. Jurnal Riset Ilmu Ekonomi, 3(2), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.23969/jrie.v3i2.57

Nurcahyo, A. M. (2021). Analisis Ketimpangan Pembangunan Antar Daerah di Jawa Timur.

Nurfifah, R., Walewangko, E. N., & Masloman, I. (2022). Analisis Pengaruh Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Investasi Terhadap Ketimpangan Kota-Kota di Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. 22.

Olabu, F. Y., Olilingo, F. Z., & Bumulo, F. (2022). An Analysis Of Regional Inequality And The Affecting Factors In Sulawesi Island.

Rachmatullah, R., Pratama, I. N., Kholishoh, L., Gunawan, S., Widiawati, L., Handayani, A., & Anwar, C. (2023). Foreign Direct Investment and Regional Inequality in Banten Province. Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainability in Technological, Environmental, Law, Management, Social and Economic Matters, ICOSTELM 2022, 4-5 November 2022,

Raharja, M. C., & Lestari, U. (2022). Analisis Ketimpangan Ekonomi Antarwilayah di Provinsi Jawa Tengah Sebelum Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja. OECONOMICUS Journal of Economics, 6(2), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.15642/oje.2022.6.2.86-101

Rahmawati, F., & Romziatin, F. (2020). Do Industrial Agglomeration and Investment Shrink Regional Inequality? Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi & Bisnis, 8(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.21009/JPEB.008.2.4

Ramadanti, V., Agussalim, A., & Suhab, S. (2023). The Effect of Regional Government Expenditures on Regional Development Inequality in Eastern Indonesia, 2015-2020. Jambura Equilibrium Journal, 5(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.37479/jej.v5i1.16949

Rangkuti, A. N., Rustiadi, E., Fauzi, A., & Mulatsih, S. (2022). Economic Growth, Investment, Economics Agglomeration, And Regional Development Inequality In West Java Province. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, 34(2), 493. https://doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v34.2.4606

Sanjaya, L. R., Soetarto, E., & Pravitasari, A. E. (2019). Ketimpangan Pembangunan Wilayah di Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah (Kajian Pada Kabupaten Kotawaringin Timur dan Pemekarannya). TATALOKA, 21(2), 253. https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.21.2.253-266

Santoso, E., Ratih, I. S., & Fatah, A. (2024). Pengaruh PDRB, Investasi, dan Aglomerasi Terhadap Ketimpangan Pembangunan Antar Wilayah di Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. 2(1).

Sukarno, F. G. (2022). Analisis Pengaruh Faktor Aglomerasi Industri Manufaktur Terhadap Ketimpangan Regional Antar Kabupaten/Kota di Jawa Barat Tahun 2015-2019.

Suntari, M. V., & Yunani, A. (2019). The Analysis of Economic Development Inequality and Inequality of Income Distribution in South Kalimantan Province (Case Study Of Banjarmasin City and Tanah Bumbu Regency).

Wulandari, F. (2021). Analisis Pengaruh Aglomerasi Industri, Indeks Pembangunan Manusia (IPM) dan Keterbukaan Ekonomi Terhadap Ketimpangan Pembangunan di Kawasan Timur Indonesia.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Determinan Ketimpangan Wilayah di Indonesia Tahun 2012–2022: Pendekatan Analisis Panel Dinamis

Dimensions Badge
Article History
Submitted: 2024-05-06
Published: 2024-06-26
Abstract View: 1242 times
PDF Download: 2620 times
How to Cite
Syaifudin, R., Alfarisi, M. S., Fitrianingsih, F., Putri, G. S. R., Jabbar, M. A., Malik, A., & Zulfa, F. N. (2024). Determinan Ketimpangan Wilayah di Indonesia Tahun 2012–2022: Pendekatan Analisis Panel Dinamis. Journal of Business and Economics Research (JBE), 5(2), 129-137. https://doi.org/10.47065/jbe.v5i2.5143
Issue
Section
Articles