Understanding the Interplay Between Industrial Mining Policy, Innovation, and Firm Business Performance
- Agus Jayana Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak, Indonesia
- Nurul Fadly Bin Habidin Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia
- Zuraidah Binti Zainol Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia
-
Rizky Hidayat
*
Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya,
Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The relationship between industrial mining policy, innovation and firm business performance is the subject of this research paper. The purpose of the study is to explore how innovation can influence business performance and whether Indonesia has a role in changing global markets. The study adopts a cross-sectional design and uses both quantitative research methods as per positivist paradigm, as well qualitative approaches. The collected data is subjected to quantitative analysis using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The specific focus of this investigation centers around Indonesian mining firms possessing mining business permits (IUP), with a total sample size of 385 respondents who participated in the survey. The findings indicate all constructs and dimensions are categorized as substantial and have predictive relevance. This study also demonstrates that innovation acts as a mediator between the industrial mining policy and firm business performance, since the path coefficient of the indirect effect of IMP → IN → FBP (0.496) is higher than the direct effect of IMP → FBP (0.323). In sum, this research emphasizes the significance of innovation in enhancing the positive correlation between the industrial mining policy and firm business performance within the Indonesian mining sector. The lessons of this research have practical applications for policymakers and industry stakeholders. Not only do they offer information about how to make money in the Indonesian mining sector, but also findings that help develop viable economic solutions which can be sustained over time. This research can help change the direction of mining toward sustainability and profit, by making clearer just how much innovation effects performance. This paper fills gaps in the current literature by providing helpful insights into innovation and business performance among Indonesia's miners.
Downloads
References
Amoah, P., & Eweje, G. (2020). CSR in Ghana’s gold-mining sector: Assessing expectations and perceptions of performance with institutional and stakeholder lenses. Social Business, 10(4), 339–363.
Amuah, E. E. Y., Tetteh, I. K., Boadu, J. A., & Nandomah, S. (2023). Environmental impact assessment practices of the federative republic of Brazil: A comprehensive review. Environmental Challenges, 100746.
Andersen, J. (2021). A relational natural-resource-based view on product innovation: The influence of green product innovation and green suppliers on differentiation advantage in small manufacturing firms. Technovation, 104, 102254.
Baird, M., & Monica Wihardja, M. (2010). Survey of recent developments. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 46(2), 143–170.
Basco, R., Hair Jr, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). Advancing family business research through modeling nonlinear relationships: Comparing PLS-SEM and multiple regression. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(3), 100457.
Beyhan Yasar, N., Sezen, B., & Karakadilar, I. S. (2019). Mediating effect of continuous improvement on the relationship between innovation and financial performance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(7–8), 893–907.
Brauer, K., Sendatzki, R., & Proyer, R. T. (2022). A primer on studying effects of relationship duration in dyadic research: Contrasting cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(7), 2117–2133.
Brodny, J., & Tutak, M. (2022). Challenges of the polish coal mining industry on its way to innovative and sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 375, 134061.
Buniya, M. K., Othman, I., Sunindijo, R. Y., Karakhan, A. A., Kineber, A. F., & Durdyev, S. (2023). Contributions of safety critical success factors and safety program elements to overall project success. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 29(1), 129–140.
Calzada Olvera, B. (2022). Innovation in mining: what are the challenges and opportunities along the value chain for Latin American suppliers? Mineral Economics, 35(1), 35–51.
Camba, A. (2021). The unintended consequences of national regulations: Large-scale-small-scale relations in Philippine and Indonesian nickel mining. Resources Policy, 74, 102213.
Canh, N. T., Liem, N. T., Thu, P. A., & Khuong, N. V. (2019). The impact of innovation on the firm performance and corporate social responsibility of Vietnamese manufacturing firms. Sustainability, 11(13), 3666.
Chatterjee, S., & Bhattacharjee, K. K. (2020). Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: A quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 3443–3463.
Chen, H., & Baptista Nunes, M. (2023). Overview and Selection of Research Methodology and Methods. In Professional Empowerment in the Software Industry through Experience-Driven Shared Tacit Knowledge: A Case Study from China (pp. 47–85). Springer.
Christofi, M., Pereira, V., Vrontis, D., Tarba, S., & Thrassou, A. (2021). Agility and flexibility in international business research: A comprehensive review and future research directions. Journal of World Business, 56(3), 101194.
Dharmayanti, N., Ismail, T., Hanifah, I. A., & Taqi, M. (2023). Exploring sustainability management control system and eco-innovation matter sustainable financial performance: The role of supply chain management and digital adaptability in indonesian context. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(3), 100119.
Diprose, R., Kurniawan, N., Macdonald, K., & Winanti, P. (2022). Regulating sustainable minerals in electronics supply chains: local power struggles and the ‘hidden costs’ of global tin supply chain governance. Review of International Political Economy, 29(3), 792–817.
Doering, T., Suresh, N. C., & Krumwiede, D. (2020). Measuring the effects of time: repeated cross-sectional research in operations and supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(1), 122–138.
Fernando, Z. J., Illahi, B. K., Putra, Y. S., & Gusri, I. (2023). Deep anti-corruption blueprint mining, mineral, and coal sector in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 2187737.
Gamil, Y., & Abd Rahman, I. (2023). Studying the relationship between causes and effects of poor communication in construction projects using PLS-SEM approach. Journal of Facilities Management, 21(1), 102–148.
Guan, A., Thomas, M., Vittinghoff, E., Bowleg, L., Mangurian, C., & Wesson, P. (2021). An investigation of quantitative methods for assessing intersectionality in health research: A systematic review. SSM-Population Health, 16, 100977.
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., Ray, S., … Sarstedt, M. (2021). An introduction to structural equation modeling. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook, 1–29.
Haque, M. S. (2022). Inductive and/or Deductive Research Designs. In Principles of Social Research Methodology (pp. 59–71). Springer.
Huang, D., Chen, S., Zhang, G., & Ye, J. (2018). Organizational forgetting, absorptive capacity, and innovation performance: A moderated mediation analysis. Management Decision, 56(1), 87–104.
Huang, J., Zhong, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Does Environmental Regulation of Cleaner Production Affect the Position of Enterprises in Global Value Chains? A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on the Implementation of Cleaner Production. Sustainability, 15(13), 10492.
Huang, Y., Raza, S. M. F., Hanif, I., Alharthi, M., Abbas, Q., & Zain-ul-Abidin, S. (2020). The role of forest resources, mineral resources, and oil extraction in economic progress of developing Asian economies. Resources Policy, 69, 101878.
Hussain, S., Maqbool, R., Hussain, A., & Ashfaq, S. (2022). Assessing the socio-economic impacts of rural infrastructure projects on community development. Buildings, 12(7), 947.
Karim, M. F. (2020). State transformation and cross-border regionalism in Indonesia’s periphery: contesting the centre. In Rising Powers and State Transformation (pp. 158–174). Routledge.
Khairani, & Arnetti, S. (2023). Protecting the rights of laid-off workers during the COVID-19 pandemic after the enactment of Law No. 11/2020 on Job Creation. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), 2260161.
Koesten, L., Gregory, K., Groth, P., & Simperl, E. (2021). Talking datasets–understanding data sensemaking behaviours. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 146, 102562.
Leyva-De la Hiz, D. I., & Bolívar-Ramos, M. T. (2022). The inverted U relationship between green innovative activities and firms’ market-based performance: The impact of firm age. Technovation, 110, 102372.
Li, F., Yang, C., Li, Z., & Failler, P. (2021). Does geopolitics have an impact on energy trade? Empirical research on emerging countries. Sustainability, 13(9), 5199.
Lindman, Å., Ranängen, H., & Kauppila, O. (2020). Guiding corporate social responsibility practice for social license to operate: A Nordic mining perspective. The Extractive Industries and Society, 7(3), 892–907.
Ma, Y., Men, J., Li, M., & Li, X. (2021). Sustainable performance evaluation: evidence from listed chinese mining corporations. Entropy, 23(3), 349.
Maponga, O. P., & Musa, C. (2021). Domestication of the role of the mining sector in Southern Africa through local content requirements. The Extractive Industries and Society, 8(1), 195–210.
Marimuthu, R., Sankaranarayanan, B., Ali, S. M., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., & Karuppiah, K. (2021). Assessment of key socio-economic and environmental challenges in the mining industry: Implications for resource policies in emerging economies. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 814–830.
Momayez, A., Rasouli, N., Alimohammadirokni, M., & Rasoolimanesh, S. M. (2023). Green entrepreneurship orientation, green innovation and hotel performance: the moderating role of managerial environmental concern. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 1–24.
Moughari, M. M., & Daim, T. U. (2023). Developing a model of technological innovation for export development in developing countries. Technology in Society, 75, 102338.
Mulisa, F. (2022). When Does a Researcher Choose a Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed Research Approach? Interchange, 53(1), 113–131.
Nem Singh, J., & Camba, A. (2020). The role of domestic policy coalitions in extractive industries’ governance: Disentangling the politics of “responsible mining” in the Philippines. Environmental Policy and Governance, 30(5), 239–251.
Pandyaswargo, A. H., Wibowo, A. D., Maghfiroh, M. F. N., Rezqita, A., & Onoda, H. (2021). The emerging electric vehicle and battery industry in Indonesia: Actions around the nickel ore export ban and a SWOT analysis. Batteries, 7(4), 80.
Park, H. I., Solon, M., Dehghan‐Chaleshtori, M., & lGhanbar, H. (2022). Proficiency reporting practices in research on second language acquisition: Have we made any progress? Language Learning, 72(1), 198–236.
Prior, T., Giurco, D., Mudd, G., Mason, L., & Behrisch, J. (2012). Resource depletion, peak minerals and the implications for sustainable resource management. Global Environmental Change, 22(3), 577–587.
Putra, V. B. K., & MH, I. M. (2021). Regulatory Reform Analysis in the Mining, Mineral and Coal Sector in Indonesia in the Perspective of Modern Mining Code.
Rajesh, R. (2020). Exploring the sustainability performances of firms using environmental, social, and governance scores. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119600.
Riahi, Y., Saikouk, T., Gunasekaran, A., & Badraoui, I. (2021). Artificial intelligence applications in supply chain: A descriptive bibliometric analysis and future research directions. Expert Systems with Applications, 173, 114702.
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Mitchell, R., & Gudergan, S. P. (2020). Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(12), 1617–1643.
Sallis, J. E., Gripsrud, G., Olsson, U. H., & Silkoset, R. (2021). Research methods and data analysis for business decisions. Springer.
Schröder, M., & Iwasaki, F. (2023). From nickel to Electric cars? Indonesia’s resource cum automotive industry policy. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 1–22.
Shi, D., DiStefano, C., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Lee, T. (2022). Evaluating SEM model fit with small degrees of freedom. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 57(2–3), 179–207.
Suh, A. (2023). The physical body as a computing interface: Theoretical conceptualization of embodied affordances and empirical validation. Telematics and Informatics, 82, 101997.
Temenggung, D., Saputro, A., Rinaldi, R., & Pane, D. (2021). Managing recovery and seizing reform opportunities. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 57(1), 1–28.
Vogl, S. (2023). Mixed methods longitudinal research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(1).
Waqar, A., Othman, I., Hayat, S., Radu, D., Khan, M. B., Galatanu, T. F., … Benjeddou, O. (2023). Building Information Modeling—Empowering Construction Projects with End-to-End Life Cycle Management. Buildings, 13(8), 2041.
Weldegiorgis, F. S., Dietsche, E., & Franks, D. M. (2021). Building mining’s economic linkages: A critical review of local content policy theory. Resources Policy, 74, 102312.
Xia, L., Gao, S., Wei, J., & Ding, Q. (2022). Government subsidy and corporate green innovation-Does board governance play a role? Energy Policy, 161, 112720.
Zhang, Q., Loh, L., & Wu, W. (2020). How do environmental, social and governance initiatives affect innovative performance for corporate sustainability? Sustainability, 12(8), 3380.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Understanding the Interplay Between Industrial Mining Policy, Innovation, and Firm Business Performance
Pages: 66-75
Copyright (c) 2024 Agus Jayana, Nurul Fadly Bin Habidin, Zuraidah Binti Zainol, Rizky Hidayat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
