Penilaian Risiko dan Alokasi Modal pada Investasi Proyek Tambang di Bawah Ketidakpastian: Peran Simulasi Monte Carlo


  • Fredy Mukti * Mail Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
  • Riam Marlina Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: Mining Project Valuation; Monte Carlo Simulation; Investment Appraisal; Downside Risk; Real Options

Abstract

Mining project valuation rests on many interacting uncertain variables, from commodity prices, exchange rates, capital and operating costs, ore grade and recovery, to fiscal terms and the discount rate. Deterministic discounted cash flow analysis is useful as a baseline but offers little information about the probability and severity of loss, which weakens it as a basis for capital allocation decisions. This review positions Monte Carlo simulation as a probabilistic investment appraisal method. The research method is a systematic literature review guided by PRISMA 2020, combining two-stage screening with thematic synthesis of eligible studies. Three search sources were used, namely Publish or Perish, ScienceDirect, and ResearchRabbit, with all records managed in Rayyan. From 6,834 initial records, a two-stage title, abstract, keyword, and metadata screening process followed by full-text verification of potentially eligible studies retained 67 studies, comprising 52 direct mining valuation studies and 15 methodological support studies. The synthesis shows that Monte Carlo simulation moves the basis of decision from a single point value to a distribution of project value together with downside risk metrics such as probability of loss, value-at-risk, and conditional value-at-risk. The review delivers a taxonomy of eight valuation method families mapped to investment decision contexts, a mapping of risk drivers to decision metrics, and a critique of simplified dependency assumptions that may make downside risk estimates too optimistic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmadi, R., & Bratvold, R. B. (2023). An exposition of least square Monte Carlo approach for real options valuation. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 222, 111230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111230

Ardian, A., & Kumral, M. (2021). Enhancing mine risk assessment through more accurate reproduction of correlations and interactions between uncertain variables. Mineral Economics, 34(3), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-020-00238-z

Armstrong, M., Lagos, T., Emery, X., Homem-de-Mello, T., Lagos, G., & Sauré, D. (2021). Adaptive open-pit mining planning under geological uncertainty. Resources Policy, 72, 102086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102086

Cardozo, F. A. C., Petter, C. O., & Albuquerque, N. R. de. (2022). Monte Carlo simulation risk analysis for underground mining projects. Tecnologia Em Metalurgia, Materiais e Mineração, 19, e2681. https://doi.org/10.4322/2176-1523.20222681

Chandra, A., & Hartley, P. R. (2024). Sequential investment decisions for mining projects using compound multiple volatility real options approach. Resources Policy, 97, 105241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105241

Fathollahzadeh, K., Asad, M. W. A., Mardaneh, E., & Cigla, M. (2021). Review of solution methodologies for open pit mine production scheduling problem. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 35(8), 564–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480930.2021.1888395

Faúndez, P., & Guzmán, J. I. (2025). Deconstructing cost overrun and delay in mining projects: A system-based model of prices, quantities, and time. Resources Policy, 110, 105754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105754

Hozman, J., Tichý, T., & Dvořáčková, H. (2024). Valuation of mining projects under dynamic model framework. Annals of Operations Research, 337(3), 1167–1204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05569-y

Kamel, A., Elwageeh, M., Bonduà, S., & Elkarmoty, M. (2023). Evaluation of mining projects subjected to economic uncertainties using the Monte Carlo simulation and the binomial tree method: Case study in a phosphate mine in Egypt. Resources Policy, 80, 103266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103266

Khodaeibabajan, A., & Ozturk, C. A. (2026). A risk-based decision framework for economic sustainability in open-pit gold mining using Monte Carlo simulation. Sustainability, 18(9), 4448. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18094448

Lagos, T., Armstrong, M., Homem-de-Mello, T., Lagos, G., & Sauré, D. (2022). A framework for adaptive open-pit mining planning under geological uncertainty. Optimization and Engineering, 23(1), 111–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-020-09557-0

Markovic, P., Stevanovic, D., Kolonja, B., Slavkovic, D., & Krzanovic, D. (2025). A hybrid model for risk-based strategic planning in open-pit mining: Integrating deterministic, stochastic, and ISO 31000 approaches. Applied Sciences, 15(5), 2500. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15052500

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Singh, J., Ardian, A., & Kumral, M. (2021). Gold-copper mining investment evaluation through multivariate copula-innovated simulations. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 38(3), 1421–1433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-021-00424-9

Stanujkic, D., Fedajev, A., & Santos, M. (2023). Investment projects evaluation in a fuzzy environment using the simplified WISP method. Serbian Journal of Management, 18(2), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm18-44522

Trijayanto, T., & Hakam, D. F. (2025). Economic viability and flexibility of the South Pasopati Coal Project, Indonesia: A real options approach under market volatility and carbon pricing. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(5), 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18050225

Valer Dávila, J. C., Gómez Galarza, V., & Court Monteverde, E. (2024). High-dimensional private and social optimal policy valuation model for non-renewable natural resource extraction projects for multivariate public policy decisions. Resources Policy, 96, 105230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105230

Yang, W., Fang, N., Wang, Y., Long, T., Deng, S., Xue, M., & Deng, B. (2022). Value evaluation of mining right based on fuzzy real options. Resources Policy, 78, 102818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102818


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Penilaian Risiko dan Alokasi Modal pada Investasi Proyek Tambang di Bawah Ketidakpastian: Peran Simulasi Monte Carlo

Dimensions Badge
Article History
Submitted: 2026-07-07
Published: 2026-10-13
Abstract View: 0 times
PDF Download: 0 times
How to Cite
Mukti, F., & Marlina, R. (2026). Penilaian Risiko dan Alokasi Modal pada Investasi Proyek Tambang di Bawah Ketidakpastian: Peran Simulasi Monte Carlo. Journal of Business and Economics Research (JBE), 7(3), 816-827. https://doi.org/10.47065/jbe.v7i3.10644
Section
Articles