The ESG Disclosure in Mitigating Information Asymmetry Risk: The Role of Corporate Governance
-
Muazila Norisnita
*
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya,
Indonesia
- Selvi Permata Groda Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya, Indonesia
- Jojok Dwiridotjahjono Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya, Indonesia
- Lidya Veronica Christy Rihidima Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya, Indonesia (*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This research employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to examine the relationship between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure and the information asymmetry through corporate governance mechanisms in today’s dynamic business environment. Despite the growing adoption of ESG reporting to meet stakeholder demands, information asymmetry continues to impede efficient capital allocation and investor confidence. However, limited understanding remains on how corporate governance mechanisms shape ESG disclosure quality and its role in reducing information asymmetry. Several theories, including signaling, stakeholder, legitimacy, and agency theory, explain firms’ motivations for ESG reporting. While ESG disclosure is expected to reduce information asymmetry, its impact remains debated due to issues such as greenwashing, report credibility, and divergent investor perceptions. Prior studies reveal a generally negative association between ESG disclosure and information asymmetry, though findings are inconsistent. Ultimately, this review seeks to develop a conceptual framework that integrates the role of corporate governance in enhancing ESG disclosure as a mechanism to reduce information asymmetry, thereby contributing to existing literature and offering practical insights.
Downloads
References
Agapova, A., King, T., & Ranta, M. (2025). Navigating transparency: The interplay of ESG disclosure and voluntary earnings guidance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 97, 103813. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103813
Aly, D. A. R. M., Hasan, A., Obioru, B., & Nakpodia, F. (2024). Corporate governance and environmental disclosure: a comparative analysis. Corporate Governance, 24(8), 210–236. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2024-0063
Angir, P., & Weli, W. (2024). The Influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Disclosure on Firm Value: An Asymmetric Information Perspective in Indonesian Listed Companies. Binus Business Review, 15(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v15i1.10460
Ardianto, A., Cahyono, S., & Sulaiman, N. A. (2024). CEOs family on the boardroom and environmental, social, and governance disclosure: Exploring from economic crisis during COVID-19. Business Strategy & Development, 7(3), e409. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.409
Bamahros, H. M., Alquhaif, A., Qasem, A., Wan-Hussin, W. N., Thomran, M., Al-Duais, S. D., Shukeri, S. N., & Khojally, H. M. A. (2022). Corporate Governance Mechanisms and ESG Reporting: Evidence from the Saudi Stock Market. In Sustainability (Vol. 14, Issue 10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106202
Bamel, N., Khatri, K., Bamel, U., & Kumar, S. (2025). ESG disclosure and firm performance in global south economy: Does industry profile and board independence moderate the relationship. International Review of Economics & Finance, 100, 104093. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104093
Berggren, H., & Pettersson, A. (2023). Exploring the relationship between ESG performance and information asymmetry: Evidence from Nasdaq Stockholm. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1783020/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Boulton, T. J. (2024). Mandatory ESG disclosure, information asymmetry, and litigation risk: Evidence from initial public offerings. European Financial Management, 30(5), 2790–2839. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12494
Chebbi, K., & Ammer, M. A. (2022). Board Composition and ESG Disclosure in Saudi Arabia: The Moderating Role of Corporate Governance Reforms. In Sustainability (Vol. 14, Issue 19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912173
Chen, X. Y. (2024). A literature review of corporate governance. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(6 SE-Articles), 8945–8949. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i6.3916
Choiriah, S., Tarmidi, D., & Ahmad, Z. (2024). ESG Disclosure, Financial Reporting Quality and Investment Efficiency. International Journal of Social Science and Business, 8(3), 455–465.
Dewi, L. C. (2020). Factors Influencing Housing Purchase Decisions of Millennial. International Journal of Management (IJM), 11(4), 350–365.
Donkor, A., Appiagyei, K., Tenakwah, E. S., Tenakwah, E. J., & Kwakye, T. O. (2025). Corporate Governance and ESG Disclosure in Fintech Firms: Does Culture Matter? Sustainable Futures, 9, 100528. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100528
Jafar, R., Basuki, B., Windijarto, W., Setiawan, R., & Yaacob, Z. (2024). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure and cost of equity: the moderating effects of board structures. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2429794. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2429794
Kim, J. W., & Park, C. K. (2023). Can ESG Performance Mitigate Information Asymmetry? Moderating Effect of Assurance Services. Applied Economics, 55(26), 2993–3007. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2022.2107991
Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(3), 1023–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00635-4
Kumari, P. S. R., Makhija, H., Sharma, D., & Behl, A. (2022). Board characteristics and environmental disclosures: evidence from sensitive and non-sensitive industries of India. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 18(4), 677–700. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-10-2021-0547
Li, W., Zhu, J., & Liu, C. (2024). Environmental, social, and governance performance, financing constraints, and corporate investment efficiency: Empirical evidence from China. Heliyon, 10(22). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40401
Liu, J., Ahmad, M. I., Ahmad, M., Nevi, G., & Cucari, N. (2025). Corporate Governance and Cost of Debt: Mediating Role of Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure. Sustainable Development, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3418
Mahajan, R., Lim, W. M., Sareen, M., Kumar, S., & Panwar, R. (2023). Stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Research, 166, 114104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114104
Makarim, F. F., Pertiwi, T. K., & Warmana, G. O. (2024). The Effect of Environmental Social Governance Disclosure On Company Value In The Energy Sector Listed on The Indonesia Stock Exchange. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 7(3), 6622–6641. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v7i3.5122
Nicolo, G., Zampone, G., Sannino, G., & Tiron-Tudor, A. (2023). Worldwide evidence of corporate governance influence on ESG disclosure in the utilities sector. Utilities Policy, 82, 101549. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101549
Oncioiu, I., Popescu, D.-M., Aviana, A. E., Șerban, A., Rotaru, F., Petrescu, M., & Marin-Pantelescu, A. (2020). The Role of Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure in Financial Transparency. In Sustainability (Vol. 12, Issue 17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176757
Peng, L. S., & Isa, M. (2020). Environmental, social and governance (Esg) practices and performance in shariah firms: Agency or stakeholder theory? Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 16(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamjaf2020.16.1.1
Rohendi, H., Ghozali, I., & Ratmono, D. (2024). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure and firm value: the role of competitive advantage as a mediator. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2297446. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2297446
Sahin, Ö., Bax, K., Czado, C., & Paterlini, S. (2022). Environmental, Social, Governance scores and the Missing pillar—Why does missing information matter? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1782–1798. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2326
Slacik, J., & Greiling, D. (2020). Coverage of G4-indicators in GRI-sustainability reports by electric utilities. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 32(3), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-06-2019-0100
Tsang, A., Frost, T., & Cao, H. (2023). Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure: A literature review. The British Accounting Review, 55(1), 101149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2022.101149
Wang, C.-Y., Weng, Y.-C., & Wang, L. (2021). Effect of air quality on corporate environmental disclosure: The moderating role of institutional investors. Borsa Istanbul Review, 21, S1–S12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.02.005
Wang, Yadong, Albitar, K., & Chbib, I. (2024). Connecting the dots: A systematic review of corporate social responsibility, information asymmetry, and economic implications. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(5), 5012–5031. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2843
Wang, Yan, & Wang, X. (2024). From ratings to action: The impact of ESG performance on corporate innovation. Heliyon, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26683
Xu, N., Liu, J., & Dou, H. (2022). Environmental, social, and governance information disclosure and stock price crash risk: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(September), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.977369
Yahaya, O. A. (2025). The Influence of Environmental Disclosure on Corporate Information Asymmetry. SSRN Electronic Journal, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5171725
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel The ESG Disclosure in Mitigating Information Asymmetry Risk: The Role of Corporate Governance
Pages: 319-328
Copyright (c) 2025 Muazila Norisnita, Selvi Permata Groda, Jojok Dwiridotjahjono, Lidya Veronica Christy Rihidima
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
