Analysis of Corruption Behavior and Good Government Governance
Abstract
The regional government system is always improving from time to time in order to realize good regional government for all people in the region. Regional governments have made efforts to realize good government governance through policy making. For various reasons, good government governance is considered an ideal concept to be implemented in local government. This research aims to analyze corrupt behavior in local government, especially in Aceh, and analyze good government governance in Aceh. This research method uses qualitative descriptive analysis with a literature review approach. We analyze the phenomenon of corruption conditions in Aceh based on document data combined with concepts and expert studies. The research results show that corruption in Aceh involves office holders at the regional level. Apart from that, what is more worrying is that corruption can even penetrate law enforcement, which is supposed to be the enforcer of justice. The emphasis on community participation in regional government is in line with the democratic system implemented in Indonesia. The community's contribution to regional government will certainly have a good impact on regional government itself. Regional government efforts to realize good government governance are carried out by implementing bureaucratic reform, implementing bureaucratic reform both in terms of institutions, procedures and human resources. Apart from that, another regional government effort in implementing good government governance is information disclosure.
Downloads
References
Aljughaiman, A. A., Nguyen, T. H., Trinh, V. Q., & Du, A. (2023). The Covid-19 outbreak, corporate financial distress and earnings management. International Review of Financial Analysis, 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102675
Basloom, R. S., Sani Mohamad, M. H., & Auzair, S. M. (2022). Applicability of Public Sector Reform Initiatives of The Yemeni Government from The Integrated TOE-DOI Framework. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 6(4), 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2022.08.005
Chatterjee, B., Jia, J., Nguyen, M., Taylor, G., & Duong, L. (2023). CEO remuneration, financial distress and firm life cycle. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102050
Cho, B. K., Chung, J. B., & Song, C. K. (2023). National climate change governance and lock-in: Insights from Korea’s conservative and liberal governments’ committees. Energy Strategy Reviews, 50(October), 101238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101238
Chung, C. S., Choi, H., & Cho, Y. (2022). Analysis of Digital Governance Transition in South Korea: Focusing on the Leadership of the President for Government Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010002
Colombarolli, C., & Lersch, P. M. (2023). Atypical Work, Financial Assets, and Asset Poverty in Germany. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 85(December 2022), 100803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2023.100803
Díaz, I., & Cano, E. (2022). Quantitative Oddy Test by The Incorporation of The Methodology of The ISO 11844 Standard: A Proof of Concept. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 57, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2022.08.001
García-Pérez-de-Lema, D., Madrid-Guijarro, A., & Duréndez, A. (2022). Operating, Financial and Investment Impacts of Covid-19 in SMEs: Public Policy Demands to Sustainable Recovery Considering the Economic Sector Moderating Effect. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 75(January). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102951
Gebka, B., Kanungo, R. P., & Wildman, J. (2024). The transition from COVID-19 infections to deaths: Do governance quality and corruption affect it? Journal of Policy Modeling, xxxx, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2024.01.002
Habu, A. A., & Henderson, T. (2023). Data Subject Rights As A Research Methodology: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Responsible Technology, 16(October). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2023.100070
Liu, D., & Qi, X. (2021). Smart governance:The era requirements and realization path of the modernization of the basic government governance ability. Procedia Computer Science, 199, 674–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.083
Mansoor, M. (2021). Citizens’ trust in government as a function of good governance and government agency’s provision of quality information on social media during COVID-19. Government Information Quarterly, 38(4), 101597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101597
McDermott, R. (2023). On The Scientific Study of Small Samples: Challenges Confronting Quantitative and Qualitative Methodologies. Leadership Quarterly, 34(3), 101675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101675
Nguyen, T. M. P., & Davidson, K. (2023). Institutionalising 100 Resilient Cities governance experiments in cities with no metropolitan government: A case study of Living Melbourne (Resilient Melbourne), Australia. Cities, 141(November 2021), 104500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104500
Nst, A. P., Sebayang, S., & Nasution, D. A. D. (2021). Enhance Successful Identification of E-Government Management in Realizing Good Government Governance in the Government of the City Of Binjai. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 4(3), 5120–5133. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i3.2301
Panggabean, F. Y. (2021). Implementation of Government Financial Information Systems Toward Local Government Financial Statements: Case Study in Deli Serdang, Indonesia. Journal of Social Sciences, IV(2), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.52326/jss.utm.2021.4(2).10
Ramadhan, P. R., Panggabean, F. Y., & Lubis, N. P. (2023). Dehumanization of Village Financial Management: Erich Fromm’s Perspective Accounting Reconstruction. International Journal Of Humanities Education And Social Sciences, 2(5), 1638–1646. https://ijhess.com/index.php/ijhess/
Sadaa, A. M., Ganesan, Y., Yet, C. E., Alkhazaleh, Q., Alnoor, A., & aldegis, A. M. (2023). Corporate governance as antecedents and financial distress as a consequence of credit risk. Evidence from Iraqi banks. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100051
Salo, M., Hiedanpää, J., Orihuela, J. C., Llerena Pinto, C. A., & Leigh Vetter, J. (2023). Governmentality in evidence? Evolving rationalities of forest governance in Peru. Land Use Policy, 129(May 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106622
Satibi, I., & Atik, R. (2023). Implementation of Village Government Capacity Building Policies in Indonesia. Tec Empresarial, 18(2), 479–493. https://revistas.tec-ac.cr/index.php/tec_empresarial/article/view/255/153
Sun, Y. (2024). Financial distress Prediction based on deep learning model. Procedia Computer Science, 243, 1069–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.127
Turner, R. (2020). Investigating how governmentality and governance influence decision making on projects. Project Leadership and Society, 1(May), 100003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2020.100003
Wang, L., Li, S., & Lv, Y. (2024). Influence of local governments on the greening of the manufacturing sector: A perspective on environmental governance objectives. Heliyon, 10(1), e23801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23801
Wang, Z., Liu, S., Wei, Y., & Wang, S. (2023). Estimating The Impact of The Outbreak of Wars on Financial Assets: Evidence from Russia-Ukraine Conflict. Heliyon, 9(11), e21380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21380
Zhang, J., & Mora, L. (2023). Nothing but symbolic: Chinese new authoritarianism, smart government, and the challenge of multi-level governance. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4), 101880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101880
Zheng, L. (2023). Collaborative governance of haze pollution between local governments. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 65, 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.09.038
Zou, Q., Mao, Z., Yan, R., Liu, S., & Duan, Z. (2023). Vision and reality of e-government for governance improvement: Evidence from global cross-country panel data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194(May), 122667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122667
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Analysis of Corruption Behavior and Good Government Governance
Pages: 290-298
Copyright (c) 2025 Dito Aditia Darma Nasution, Martin Yehezkiel Sianipar, Yerisma Welly

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).