Classification of Swiftlet Nest Quality Based on SNI 8998:2021 Using Deep Learning


  • Ilmiati Ilmiati * Mail Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima, Bima, Indonesia
  • Siti Mutmainah Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima, Bima, Indonesia
  • Khairunnas Khairunnas Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima, Bima, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: Deep Learning; Image Classification; MobileNetV2; ResNet50; YOLOv8n-cls; Swiftlet's Nest

Abstract

The quality of swiftlet nests is a key factor in determining the market value and quality standards of this commodity in both domestic and international markets. The quality classification process, which is currently dominated by manual methods, has fundamental weaknesses, namely high subjectivity and inconsistency in sorting results. This study aims to evaluate the performance of deep learning architectures in automatically classifying the quality of swiftlet nests based on visual characteristics. The main contribution of this study is to address the research gap in previous publications by strictly aligning quality class labels with the formal document of the Indonesian National Standard (SNI) 8998:2021, as well as presenting a cross-architecture comparative analysis to map model performance trade-offs. Evaluations were conducted on the MobileNetV2, and presents a cross-architecture comparative analysis to map model performance trade-offs. Evaluations were conducted on the MobileNetV2, ResNet50, and YOLOv8n-cls architectures using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics. The research dataset includes visual images of swiftlet nests grouped into three quality classes (good, moderate, and poor) through self-documentation and augmentation techniques. Test results show that YOLOv8n-cls achieved the highest performance in this scenario with an accuracy of 99.5%, precision of 98.78%, recall of 98.72%, and an F1-score of 98.71%. Meanwhile, MobileNetV2 achieved a competitive accuracy of 98.37% with good computational efficiency, while ResNet50 demonstrated the lowest performance (66% accuracy) due to network complexity on the limited dataset. This research indicates that lightweight architectures exhibit good stability for limited-size visual datasets; however, external validation using larger datasets remains necessary to test the models’ generalization capabilities more broadly.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

W. Adelina and R. S. Munawaroh, “Analisis Kualitas Produk dan Strategi Pemasaran Sarang Burung Walet di Kecamatan Pelaihari Kabupaten Tanah Laut,” Din. Ekon. J. Ekon. dan Bisnis, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 393–402, 2023, doi: 10.53651/jdeb.v16i2.453.

R. A. Sari, R. A. Setiawan, and E. Setiawan, “Analisis Potensi Pasar Ekspor Sarang Burung Walet Menuju Pasar Internasional dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Islam (Studi Kasus di Desa Rena Panjang),” J. Ilm. Mhs. Perbank. Syariah, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 691–706, 2025, doi: 10.36908/jimpa.

M. Irfan, A. Patimbangi, and Jumriani, “Analisis Budidaya Sarang Burung Walet terhadap Peningkatan Pendapatan Rumah Tangga di Kelurahan Lonrae Kabupaten Bone,” Arus J. Sos. dan Hum., vol. 5, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.57250/ajsh.v5i2.1174.

P. R. Prayogo and P. H. Susilo, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Menentukan Kualitas Sarang Burung Walet Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” Insearch (Information Syst. Res. J., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 83–89, 2022, doi: 10.15548/isrj.v2i02.4363.

BSN, “Penetapan Standar Nasional Indonesia 8998:2021, Sarang Burung Walet Bersih,” SCRBD. Accessed: Sep. 05, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.scribd.com/document/623102005/SNI-Sarang-Burung-Walet

S. Ahmad and Supatman, “Analisis CNN untuk Klasifikasi Kebersihan Sarang Burung Walet,” J. Inform. dan Tek. Elektro Terap., vol. 13, no. 3, 2025, doi: 10.23960/jitet.v13i3.6685.

Fitriany, M. Zainul, and A. Santi, “Kebijaksanaan Inovasi Guna Meningkatkan Produktivitas dan Kualitas Sarang Burung Walet (Studi Usaha Burung Walet PT. Adipurna Mranata Jaya Kapuas),” Pros. Semin. Nas. Ekon., vol. 1, pp. 133–138, 2023, doi: 10.31602/piuk.v0i0.12465.

I. A. Prasetya, F. Sukandiarsyah, N. A. Fitri, and S. Adam, “Klasifikasi Kualitas Buah Jeruk menggunakan Computer Vision dengan Arsitektur YOLOv8,” J. Pendidik. Inform. dan Sains, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 187–201, 2024, doi: 10.31571/saintek.v13i2.8346.

M. A. Syaharani, T. Aurelly, C. Budianto, and R. I. Adam, “Klasifikasi Buah Segar dan Busuk Menggunakan Algoritma Convolutional Neural Network (CNN),” JATI (Jurnal Mhs. Tek. Inform., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 10823–10827, 2024, doi: 10.36040/jati.v8i5.11132.

S. A. Maulana, S. H. Batubara, Y. Permata, P. Pasaribu, H. Syahputra, and F. Ramadhani, “Deteksi Burung menggunakan Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) dengan Model Arsitektur MobileNetV2,” JATI (Jurnal Mhs. Tek. Inform., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 6108–6114, 2024, doi: 10.36040/jati.v8i4.10126.

M. Adeva, F. Muttaqin, and B. M. Mulyo, “Analisis Efisiensi Arsitektur U-Net dengan Encoder MobileNetV2 pada Segmentasi Karat Daun Kopi,” J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 84–90, 2026, doi: 10.37859/coscitech.v7i1.11221.

M. I. Anshori, R. A. Yaqin, M. Ali, Z. Sidiq, and W. P. Agung, “Klasifikasi Jenis Jerawat secara Otomatis dengan Convolutional Neural Network Menggunakan Arsitektur Resnet-50,” J. Manaj. Inform., vol. 15, no. April, pp. 73–84, 2025, doi: 10.34010/jamika.v15i1.13712.

E. Tenda, S. C. W. Ngangi, C. A. J. Soewoeh, and E. Ketaren, “Sistem Deteksi Hama pada Tanaman Jagung ( Zea Mays ) Berbasis Kecerdasan Buatan dan Internet Of Things ( IoT ),” J. TIMES, vol. XIV, no. 2, pp. 225–233, 2025, doi: 10.51351/jtm.14.2.2025879.

F. Agus, E. Sulfika, and G. Mahendra Putra, “Analisis Kualitas Sarang Burung Walet menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Tsukamoto,” J. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 391–398, 2025, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.2025129441.

D. Husen, “Evaluasi Teknik Augmentasi Data untuk Klasifikasi Tumor Otak Menggunakan CNN pada Citra MRI,” EKNIMEDIA Teknol. Inf. dan Multimed., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 219–227, 2024, doi: 10.46764/teknimedia.v5i2.220.

I. P. Agus, K. Hidjah, N. Sulistianingsih, G. Hendro, and Syahrir, “Implementasi Arsitektur Deep Convolutional Neural Network ( CNN ) dengan Transfer Learning untuk Klasifikasi Penyakit Kulit,” J. Teknol. Inf. dan Multimed. (JTIM ), vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 461–477, 2025, doi: 10.35746/jtim.v7i3.734.

G. V. Agustin, M. Ayub, and S. L. Liliawati, “Deteksi dan Klasifikasi Tingkat Keparahan Jerawat : Perbandingan Metode You Only Look Once,” J. Tek. Inform. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 468–481, 2024, doi: 10.28932/jutisi.v10i3.9414.

J. Sanjaya and M. Ayub, “Augmentasi Data Pengenalan Citra Mobil Menggunakan Pendekatan Random Crop , Rotate , dan Mixup,” J. Tek. Inform. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 311–323, 2020, doi: 10.28932/jutisi.v6i2.2688.

N. H. Muttaqin and A. M. Widodo, “Evaluation of Transfer Learning-Based Convolutional Neural Networks (InceptionV3 and MobileNetV2) for Facial Skin-Type Classification,” J. Ilmu Komput. dan Inform., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 11–32, 2025, doi: 10.54082/jiki.264.

M. M. Nugraha, M. D. F. Saputra, D. A. Fauzan, and E. Y. Puspaningrum, “Augmentasi Data Pengenalan Citra Batik Yogyakarta menggunakan Pendekatan Random Crop , Rotate , dan MixUp,” Semin. Nas. Inform. Bela Negara, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 152–158, 2025, doi: 10.33005/santika.v5i1.680.

M. A. Al-fahrezi, “Pengaruh Augmentasi Data terhadap Akurasi Pelatihan Model CNN untuk Klasifikasi Jenis Ikan,” J. Ilm. Teknol. Sist. Inf., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 177–185, 2025, doi: 10.62527/jitsi.6.2.471.

H. Firdaus, “Pengembangan Algoritma Numerik yang Efisien untuk Menyelesaikan Persamaan Diferensial Parsial dalam Simulasi Matematika Modern,” Mandalika J. Ilmu Pendidik. dan Bhs., vol. 3, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.59613/jipb.v3i1.289.

H. Rumapea, “Evaluasi Kinerja CNN dan Vision Transformer pada Klasifikasi Citra Resolusi Tinggi Berbasis Deep Learning,” METHOMIKA J. Manaj. Inform. Komputerisasi Akunt., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 372–379, 2025, doi: 10.46880/jmika.Vol9No2.pp372-379.

G. Jocher, A. Chaurasia, and J. Qiu, “Explore Ultralytics YOLOv8,” Ultralytics Docs. Accessed: May 22, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://docs.ultralytics.com/models/yolov8

A. Rismayanti and R. Rahmadewi, “Deteksi dan Klasifikasi Tingkat Kematangan Buah Mangga Harum Manis Menggunakan You Only Look Once ( YOLO ) V8,” JATI (Jurnal Mhs. Tek. Inform., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 3645–3654, 2025, doi: 10.36040/jati.v9i3.13320.

T. Puspita, E. R. Swedia, M. Cahyanti, and M. R. D. Septian, “A Real-Time Helmet Detection System Based on YOLOv8 to Support Traffic Law Enforcement Sistem Deteksi Penggunaan Helm Secara Real-Time Berbasis YOLOv8 untuk Mendukung Penegakan Hukum Lalu Lintas,” Sebatik, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2025, doi: 10.46984/sebatik.v29i1.2585.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Classification of Swiftlet Nest Quality Based on SNI 8998:2021 Using Deep Learning

Dimensions Badge
Article History
Submitted: 2026-05-09
Published: 2026-06-23
Abstract View: 28 times
PDF Download: 20 times
How to Cite
Ilmiati, I., Mutmainah, S., & Khairunnas, K. (2026). Classification of Swiftlet Nest Quality Based on SNI 8998:2021 Using Deep Learning. Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS), 8(1), 308-317. https://doi.org/10.47065/bits.v8i1.9901
Issue
Section
Articles