Integrasi Model Hibrida TOPSIS-BORDA untuk Penentuan Prioritas Strategi Digitalisasi Pesantren yang Berkelanjutan
-
Shofi Putri Lathifah
*
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo, Semarang,
Indonesia
- Adzhal Arwani Mahfud Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo, Semarang, Indonesia
- Wenty Dwi Yuniarti Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo, Semarang, Indonesia
- Khotibul Umam Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo, Semarang, Indonesia (*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Digital transformation in Islamic boarding schools (pesantren) holds a specific urgency as these institutions face the challenge of integrating administrative governance modernization with the preservation of salaf traditions, a dilemma rarely found in general formal education. Resource limitations and preference differences among leaders and administrators often trigger strategic deadlocks. This study aims to determine sustainable digitalization strategies at Pondok Pesantren YPMI Al-Firdaus Semarang by integrating the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Borda Count. The TOPSIS model is utilized to objectively evaluate the technical feasibility of seven criteria, while BORDA facilitates quantitative deliberation to accommodate the preferences of five decision-makers. The analysis results indicate that alternative A1 (Digitalization of Administrative Management) becomes the main priority with a relative closeness value of 0.738 and a BORDA consensus score of 8.7664. This figure significantly outperforms other alternatives, proving that the improvement of basic administration is the most urgent and mutually agreed-upon foundation before the pesantren advances to more complex digitalization. Although this study is on a local scale, the integration of these methods proves effective in mapping social and technical compromises, and can be adapted by other pesantren with similar characteristics.
Downloads
References
Y. S. Haris, L. R. Sugiara, L. W. S. Atmaja, and M. I. Baihaqqi, “Analysis of the Needs, Readiness, Strategies, and Challenges of Islamic Boarding Schools in Implementing AI in the Learning Curriculum,” in Proceeding of International Conference on Islamic Boarding School (ICOP), vol. 2, no. 1, 2025. doi: 10.61159/icop.v2i1.580.
A. Pratama, S. Sucipto, and A. Nugroho, “Evaluasi Efektivitas E-Learning Menggunakan Usability Testing dengan Metode TOPSIS,” JSITIK J. Sist. Inf. dan Teknol. Inf. Komput., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2024. doi: 10.53624/jsitik.v3i1.430
P. A. Santa Meriska Br, M. Halim, and T. S. Alasi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan SMA Bagi Siswa SMP Dengan Metode Analytical Hirarchy Process (AHP),” J. Armada Inform., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 19–26, 2024. doi: 10.36520/jai.v8i2.128
V. K. Anggoro, A. Riski, and A. Kamsyakawuni, “Penerapan Metode Fuzzy TOPSIS sebagai Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Mahasiswa Berprestasi,” J. Ilmu Dasar Vol., vol. 24, pp. 31–36, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JID
H. U. Khan, M. Abbas, O. Alruwaili, S. Nazir, M. H. Siddiqi, and S. Alanazi, “Selection of a smart and secure education school system based on the internet of things using entropy and TOPSIS approaches,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 159, p. 108346, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2024.108346
H. Santoso, W. Widodo, and R. Swastyani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelompok Pemilihan Pegawai Terbaik dengan Metode AHP, Oreste dan Borda,” J. FASILKOM, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 681–687, 2024. doi: 10.37859/jf.v14i3.8095
Made Arya Budhi; Retantyo Wardoyo, “Group Decision Support System Determination of Best Employee Using TOPSIS and BORDA,” Indones. J. Comput. Cybern. Syst., 2024, doi: 10.22146/ijccs.22773 [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/ijccs/article/view/22773
S. Bahri and N. Najiburrahman, “Digital Transformation in Pesantren: The Kyai’s Role in Improving Educational Services,” Indones. J. Educ. Soc. Stud., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 61–72, 2024. doi: 10.33650/ijess.v3i2. 3417
C. Z. Radulescu, M. Radulescu, and R. Boncea, “A Hybrid Group Weighting Method based on the Borda and the Group Best Worst Method with application for digital development indicators,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 214, pp. 10–17, 2022.doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.11.142
H. Hozairi, A. N. Qomar, H. Hoiriyah, and A. Wafi, “Penerapan Metode Hybrid AHP-TOPSIS Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Program Studi Terbaik Di Universitas Islam Madura,” Bina Insa. Ict J., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 93–101, 2023. doi: 10.51211/biict.v9i2.1833
S. Forouzandeh, M. Rostami, and K. Berahmand, “A Hybrid Method for Recommendation Systems based on Tourism with an Evolutionary Algorithm and Topsis Model,” Fuzzy Information and Engineering, vol. 8658, 2022, doi: 10.1080/16168658.2021.2019430.
M. S. Hasan, “Transformasi Literasi Pesantren di Nusantara: Dari Kitab Kuning ke Ebook dalam Perspektif Peradaban Islam (Abad Ke-16 Hingga Abad Ke-21),” 2025, UNUSIA. [Online]. Available: https://unusia.ac.id/prodi/s1sejarahperadabanislam
B. Syafaruddin, “Modernization and renewal Islamic education in the era of Society 5.0: A systematic review,” ETDC Indones. J. Res. Educ. Rev., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 105–117, 2024. doi: 10.51574/ijrer.v3i3.1802
A. Nugroho and A. P. Astutik, “Digital Transformation of Islamic Boarding School Education: Transformasi Digital Pendidikan Pesantren,” Indones. J. Islam. Stud., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 10–21070, 2024. doi: 10.21070/ijis.v12i2.1723
S. Mutmainah and M. R. Romadhon, “Digitalization of Islamic boarding schools in forming santri mental accounting,” J. Inf. Syst. Digit. Bus., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 68–78, 2023. doi: 10.38142/jisdb.v1i2.1235
A. Shafaei, J. Heidary-Dahooie, A. Babaei, A. Çalık, and E. B. Tirkolaee, “An integrated decision-making approach for identifying sustainable tier-1 suppliers: Fuzzy Delphi-Borda-SWARA,” Ann. Oper. Res., pp. 1–38, 2025. doi: 10.1007/s10479-025-06923-y
W. Widodo, “Transformasi Manajemen Pendidikan Islam Dalam Era Digital: Studi Kasus Pondok Pesantren,” J. Bina Ummat Membina dan Membentengi Ummat, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 119–127, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.38214/jurnalbinaummatstidnatsir.v8i1.349.
T. N. Sari, R. Astriratma, and S. Mulyana, “Group Decision Support System (GDSS) Model on Software Engineer Selection: Integration of AHP, SAW, TOPSIS, and BORDA,” JIKO (Jurnal Inform. dan Komputer), vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 186–203, 2025. doi: 10.26798/jiko.v9i1.1495
M. A. Beheshtinia, M. S. Safarzadeh, M. Fathi, M. Ghobakhloo, M. Al-Emran, and M. L. Tseng, “Enhancing healthcare waste management: a novel hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method,” Manag. Environ. Qual. An Int. J., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1095–1124, 2025. doi: 10.1108/MEQ-09-2024-0368
B. Ge, “A hybrid approach for educational development assessment in higher education with trapezoidal fuzzy neutrosophic analysis: towards optimized decision-making and strategic improvement,” Neutrosophic Sets Syst., vol. 79, no. 1, p. 27, 2025. [Online]. Avaiilable: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nss_journal/vol79/iss1/27
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Integrasi Model Hibrida TOPSIS-BORDA untuk Penentuan Prioritas Strategi Digitalisasi Pesantren yang Berkelanjutan
Pages: 2553-2562
Copyright (c) 2026 Shofi Putri Lathifah, Adzhal Arwani Mahfud, Wenty Dwi Yuniarti, Khotibul Umam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
