Evaluasi Destinasi Wisata Terbaik di Indonesia Dengan Kombinasi Metode ARAS dan AHP
Abstract
The management of tourist destinations in Indonesia strives to enhance the quality and comfort for tourists by considering safety aspects. To evaluate the best tourist destinations based on safety and comfort criteria, this study applied a decision support system using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to calculate the weights of each safety criterion, including visitor insurance, safety and security procedures, standard operating procedures, tourism business certification, the number of destinations, and operational permits. The Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method was then used to rank tourist destinations based on the calculated weights. The results of the AHP method provided accurate priority weights, while the ARAS ranking positioned Central Java (A3) as the highest-ranked destination with a score of 0.956, followed by Jakarta (A1) with a score of 0.897, and Yogyakarta (A4) with a score of 0.840. A Spearman correlation test between the AHP-ARAS ranking and visitor numbers resulted in a coefficient of 0.857 with a p-value of 0.014, indicating a very strong and statistically significant positive relationship. This study provides valid recommendations for tourists and decision-makers in selecting tourist destinations that align with prioritized safety criteria, while also supporting the development of data-driven and objective tourism management policies.
Downloads
References
M. H. Aziz, “Model Pariwisata Digital dalam Pengembangan Pariwisata Indonesia,” J. Ilm. Univ. Batanghari Jambi, vol. 22, no. 3, p. 2279, 2022, doi: 10.33087/jiubj.v22i3.2246.
N. Riani, “Pariwisata Adalah Pisau Bermata 2,” J. Inobasi Penelit., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1469–1474, 2021.
F. Hidayanti, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Wisatawan Yang Akan Berkunjung Ke Tempat Wisata Di Pulau Lombok Menurut Undang-Undang Tentang Kepariwisataan ,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Komunikasi, Adm. Negara dan Huk., vol. 1, no. 1 SE-Articles, pp. 227–232, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.30656/senaskah.v1i1.148.
S. Mardayanti, G. Ganefi, and T. Sofyan, “Implementasi Pasal 20 Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kepariwisataan Terhadap Hak-Hak Wisatawan Di Objek Wisata Pantai Jakat Bengkulu,” J. Ilm. Kutei, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 33–47, 2023, doi: 10.33369/jkutei.v22i1.26696.
A. Armanu, A. Rofiq, N. Suryadi, and R. Anggraeni, “Penyusunan Strategi Pengembangan Kampung Tempe Sanan Kota Malang sebagai Destinasi Wisata di Jawa Timur,” J. Abdi Masy. Indones., vol. 3, no. 2 SE-Artikel, pp. 411–418, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.54082/jamsi.667.
K. Kusmanto, M. B. K. Nasution, S. Suryadi, and A. Karim, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Rekomendasi Kelayakan nasabah Penerima Kredit Menerapkan Metode MOORA dan MOOSRA,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1284–1292, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i3.2610.
M. R. Ridho, H. Hairani, K. A. Latif, and R. Hammad, “Kombinasi Metode AHP dan TOPSIS untuk Rekomendasi Penerima Beasiswa SMK Berbasis Sistem Pendukung Keputusan,” J. Tekno Kompak, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 26, 2021, doi: 10.33365/jtk.v15i1.905.
A. Iskandar, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekomendasi Dalam Pemilihan Pemeliharaan Ikan Air Tawar Ekonomis Menerapkan Metode Additive Ratio Assesment (ARAS),” J. Sist. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 4, no. 2, p. 365, 2022, doi: 10.30865/json.v4i2.5176.
S. Saefudin and S. Wahyuningsih, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Penilaian Kinerja Pegawai Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp) Pada RSUD Serang,” JSiI (Jurnal Sist. Informasi), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 33–37, 2017, doi: 10.30656/jsii.v1i0.78.
J. and A. A. and A. W. A. Siregar, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Terbaik Dengan Metode Ahp Dan Topsis,” J. Innov. Res. Knowl., vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 1273–1284, 2022.
C. Tarigan, E. F. Ginting, and R. Syahputra, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Menentukan Kinerja Pengajar Dengan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS),” J-SISKO TECH (Jurnal Teknol. Sist. Inf. dan Sist. Komput. TGD), vol. 5, no. 1, p. 16, 2022, doi: 10.53513/jsk.v5i1.4245.
Nindian Puspa Dewi, Ubaidi, and Elsi Maharani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Sales Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dan Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) Berbasis Web,” Digit. Zo. J. Teknol. Inf. dan Komun., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 172–183, 2021, doi: 10.31849/digitalzone.v12i2.7721.
A. Sari, N. Hasibuan, and I. Saputra, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN TINTER KACA FILM TERBAIK MENGGUNAKAN METODE ARAS (STUDI KASUS: PT. DEGREE THE AMBASSADOR),” KOMIK (Konferensi Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 3, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.30865/komik.v3i1.1606.
L. Joli Afriany, “Penerapan Metode ARAS Guna Mendukung Keputusan Produk Unggulan Daerah,” Semin. Nas. Teknol. Komput. Sains, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 441–447, 2019.
K. Kraugusteeliana, A. Subagiyo, and F. Setyawan, “Pemilihan Jenis Obat Terbaik Untuk Gejala Batuk Remaja dengan Menggunakan Metode AHP dan ARAS,” JURIKOM (Jurnal Ris. Komputer), vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 2172–2182, 2022.
M. A. Prayogo, “Penerapan Kombinasi Metode AHP dan ARAS Untuk Menentukan Perusahaan Pengembang Perumahan Terbaik,” vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1076–1084, 2024, doi: 10.47065/josh.v5i4.5263.
R. G. Mahendra, R. A. Trenady, and P. T. Pungkasanti, “Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process dan Additive Ratio Assessment Dalam Menentukan Target Promosi Universitas,” vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 662–672, 2024, doi: 10.47065/bits.v6i2.5469.
A. Akmaludin, E. G. S., R. Rinawati, E. Arisawati, and L. S. Dewi, “Decision Support for Selection of The Best Teachers Recommendations MCDM-AHP and ARAS Collaborative Methods,” Sinkron, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2036–2048, 2023, doi: 10.33395/sinkron.v8i4.12354.
G. S. Mahendra et al., SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN (Teori dan Penerapannya dalam berbagai Metode). PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia, 2023.
J. Marito, W. B. Nainggolan, and G. S. Mahendra, “Penerapan Metode Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) dalam Pemilihan Franchise Minuman,” J. Teknol. Terpadu, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 32–39, 2023, doi: 10.54914/jtt.v10i1.1183.
M. Yazdani, P. Zarate, E. Kazimieras Zavadskas, and Z. Turskis, “A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems,” Manag. Decis., vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 2501–2519, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1108/MD-05-2017-0458.
M. Hakim and Rapiun, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Jurusan Pada Smk Negeri 1 Pringgabaya Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy …,” J. Manaj. Inform. dan Sist. …, vol. 7, pp. 62–73, 2024,
R. Fauzy, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Les Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy-AHP (Studi Kasus: English School Indonesia),” JITSI J. Ilm. Teknol. Sist. Inf., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 2024,
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Evaluasi Destinasi Wisata Terbaik di Indonesia Dengan Kombinasi Metode ARAS dan AHP
Pages: 1769-1780
Copyright (c) 2024 Ariq Firmansyah, Bagus Hadi Susanto, Agusta Praba Ristadi Pinem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).