Conversational Recommender System based on Functional Requirement using Knowledge Graph for Building Personal Computer
Abstract
When a person wants to build a personal computer, this person needs to browse many kinds of computer components. Besides that, this person needs to consider the compatibility between hardware and an affordable price. This will be a problem for people who are still unfamiliar with the computer, due to their lack of understanding of how compatibility between computer components works and the time-consuming nature of market research. To deal with this problem, the recommender system will assist in finding and matching compatibility efficiently based on the functional requirements of the user. The recommender system will issue various products based on the preferences and interests of the user, but some recommendations still need to be checked for compatibility. With the help of developing a Conversational Recommender System by utilizing the Knowledge Graph, it will be easier to construct the relationship between component compatibility. We propose this research by using Knowledge Graph as alternative from ontology to build Conversational Recommender system in Building Personal Computer. This research will involve the user to prove whether the recommendations from this system meet the needs and accuracy of the recommendations requested. The main results of this study will issue a recommendation for the development of personal computers by considering compatibility using the Conversational Recommender System using the Knowledge Graph approach.
Downloads
References
J. Dietmar, M. Zanker, A. Felfernig, and G. Friedrich, Recommendation system -An Introduction, vol. 91. 2010.
D. H. Park, H. K. Kim, I. Y. Choi, and J. K. Kim, “A literature review and classification of recommender systems research,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 10059–10072, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.038.
B. Vilhelmson, E. Thulin, and E. Elldér, “Where does time spent on the Internet come from? Tracing the influence of information and communications technology use on daily activities,” Inf. Commun. Soc., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 250–263, 2017, doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1164741.
N. Wagner, K. Hassanein, and M. Head, “Computer use by older adults: A multi-disciplinary review,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 870–882, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.029.
M. C. Han and Y. Kim, “Why Consumers Hesitate to Shop Online: Perceived Risk and Product Involvement on Taobao.com,” J. Promot. Manag., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 24–44, 2017, doi: 10.1080/10496491.2016.1251530.
Z. K. A. Baizal, D. H. Widyantoro, and N. U. Maulidevi, “Factors Influencing User’s Adoption of Conversational Recommender System Based on Product Functional Requirements,” TELKOMNIKA (Telecommunication Comput. Electron. Control., vol. 14, no. 4, p. 1575, 2016, doi: 10.12928/telkomnika.v14i4.4234.
Z. K. A. Baizal, D. H. Widyantoro, and N. U. Maulidevi, “Design of knowledge for conversational recommender system based on product functional requirements,” Proc. 2016 Int. Conf. Data Softw. Eng. ICoDSE 2016, 2017, doi: 10.1109/ICODSE.2016.7936151.
Z. K. A. Baizal, D. H. Widyantoro, and N. U. Maulidevi, “Computational model for generating interactions in conversational recommender system based on product functional requirements,” Data Knowl. Eng., vol. 128, no. February, p. 101813, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.datak.2020.101813.
M. S. Ayundhita, Z. K. A. Baizal, and Y. Sibaroni, “Ontology-based conversational recommender system for recommending laptop,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1192, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1192/1/012020.
R. He, C. Packer, and J. Mcauley, “Learning compatibility across categories for heterogeneous item recommendation,” Proc. - IEEE Int. Conf. Data Mining, ICDM, no. 2, pp. 937–942, 2017, doi: 10.1109/ICDM.2016.65.
J. J. Miller, “Graph database applications and concepts with Neo4j,” Proc. South. Assoc. Inf. Syst. Conf. Atlanta, GA, USA, vol. 2324, p. 36, 2013.
Z. K. Abdurahman Baizal, Y. R. Murti, and Adiwijaya, “Evaluating functional requirements-based compound critiquing on conversational recommender system,” 2017 5th Int. Conf. Inf. Commun. Technol. ICoIC7 2017, vol. 0, no. c, 2017, doi: 10.1109/ICoICT.2017.8074656.
X. Wang, D. Wang, C. Xu, X. He, Y. Cao, and T. S. Chua, “Explainable reasoning over knowledge graphs for recommendation,” 33rd AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell. AAAI 2019, 31st Innov. Appl. Artif. Intell. Conf. IAAI 2019 9th AAAI Symp. Educ. Adv. Artif. Intell. EAAI 2019, pp. 5329–5336, 2019, doi: 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33015329.
F. Zhang, N. J. Yuan, D. Lian, X. Xie, and W. Y. Ma, “Collaborative knowledge base embedding for recommender systems,” Proc. ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discov. Data Min., vol. 13-17-Augu, pp. 353–362, 2016, doi: 10.1145/2939672.2939673.
H. Wang et al., “RippleNet: Propagating user preferences on the knowledge graph for recommender systems,” Int. Conf. Inf. Knowl. Manag. Proc., pp. 417–426, 2018, doi: 10.1145/3269206.3271739.
X. Chen, S. Jia, and Y. Xiang, “A review: Knowledge reasoning over knowledge graph,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 141, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112948.
I. Englander, The architecture of computer hardware systems software: an information technology approach, 5th Editio., vol. 34, no. 02. Don Fowley, 2014.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Conversational Recommender System based on Functional Requirement using Knowledge Graph for Building Personal Computer
Pages: 1774−1781
Copyright (c) 2023 Rafi Rizkya Aryanta, Z. K. A Baizal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).





















