Komparasi Algoritma Klasifikasi Data Mining Menggunakan Optimize Selection untuk Peminatan Program Studi


  • Khaerul Anam STMIK LIKMI, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Bani Nurhakim * Mail STMIK LIKMI, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Christina Juliane STMIK LIKMI, Bandung, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: Comparison; Data Mining; Classification Algorithm; Optimize Selection; Study Program Specialization

Abstract

The selection of a study program is a unique opportunity for a student. STMIK IKMI Cirebon is now a KIP Kuliah provider, offering three study program. The research problem is the unavailability of a model of student interest in the study program, so it is necessary to carry out an interest in the study program by applying an algorithm to the classification model. The algorithm used as a comparison is the Decision Tree algorithm (C4.5), Naive Bayes, k-Nearest Neighbor and Support Vector Machine. The classification model applies the Optimize Selection operator by looking for the dominant attribute in its influence on the specialization of the student study program. Finally, the comparison model will be tested by parametric t-test in order to test the significance of the algorithm. The results of the algorithm accuracy test obtained that the SVM algorithm has the best accuracy with a value of 80.76%. While the algorithm with the lowest accuracy is Naive Bayes with a value of 74.64%. While the other two algorithms have a sequential accuracy rate of 80.47% for Decision Tree and 76.09% for k-NN. The results of this study are used to classify study preference for students in STMIK IKMI Cirebon which is useful for predicting study interest based on the background of students

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. R. Pratama, Rio Rizki Aryanto, and Lizda Iswari, “Studi Komparasi Model Klasifikasi Berbasis Pembelajaran Mesin untuk Sistem Rekomendasi Program Studi,” J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 853–862, 2021, doi: 10.29207/resti.v5i5.3392.

U. Enri, “PENERAPAN ALGORITMA C4.5 DALAM PEMILIHAN PROGRAM STUDI FAKULTAS ILMU KOMPUTER (Studi Kasus Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri 1 Tambun Utara),” J. Rekayasa Inf., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2018.

T. B. Sasongko, “Komparasi dan Analisis Kinerja Model Algoritma SVM dan PSO-SVM (Studi Kasus Klasifikasi Jalur Minat SMA),” J. Tek. Inform. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 244–253, 2016, doi: 10.28932/jutisi.v2i2.476.

R. Annisa, “Analisis Komparasi Algoritma Klasifikasi Data Mining Untuk Prediksi Penderita Penyakit Jantung,” J. Tek. Inform. Kaputama, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 22–28, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.kaputama.ac.id/index.php/JTIK/article/view/141/156

I. Hidayanti, T. B. Kurniawan, and A. Afriyudi, “Perbandingan Dan Analisis Metode Klasifikasi Untuk Menentukan Konsentrasi Jurusan,” J. Ilm. Inform. Glob., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 16–21, 2020, doi: 10.36982/jig.v11i1.1067.

O. Arifin and T. B. Sasongko, “Analisa perbandingan tingkat performansi metode support vector machine dan naïve bayes classifier,” Semin. Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Multimed. 2018, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 67–72, 2018.

R. T. Prasetio and E. Ripandi, “Optimasi Klasifikasi Jenis Hutan Menggunakan Deep Learning Berbasis Optimize Selection,” J. Inform., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 100–106, 2019, doi: 10.31311/ji.v6i1.5176.

Y. A. Wijaya, N. Suarna, Iin, R. Hamonangan, and R. Nining, “Comparison of machine learning algorithm for Santander dataset,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1088, no. 1, p. 012032, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/1088/1/012032.

A. M. Hilda, I. Rahmadi, A. R. Dzikrillah, and D. Mugisidi, “UHAMKA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN ALGORITMA CLASSIFIER,” no. 6, pp. 1–6.

M. E. Lasulika, “Komparasi Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine Dan K-Nearest Neighbor Untuk Mengetahui Akurasi Tertinggi Pada Prediksi Kelancaran Pembayaran Tv Kabel,” Ilk. J. Ilm., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 11–16, 2019, doi: 10.33096/ilkom.v11i1.408.11-16.

G. A. Pradnyana, I. G. M. Darmawiguna, D. K. S. Suditresna Jaya, and A. Sasmita, “Performance analysis of support vector machines with polynomial kernel for sentiment polarity identification: A case study in lecturer’s performance questionnaire,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1810, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1810/1/012033.

S. A. Deni Gunawan, Dwiza Riana, Dian Ardiansyah, Fajar Akbar, “Komparasi Algoritma Support Vector Machine Dan Naïve Bayes Dengan Algoritma Genetika Pada Analisis Sentimen Calon Gubernur,” vol. V, no. 1, pp. 135–138, 2019, doi: 10.31294/jtk.v4i2.

H. Apriyani and K. Kurniati, “Perbandingan Metode Naïve Bayes Dan Support Vector Machine Dalam Klasifikasi Penyakit Diabetes Melitus,” J. Inf. Technol. Ampera, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 133–143, 2020, doi: 10.51519/journalita.volume1.isssue3.year2020.page133-143.

“Optimize Selection - RapidMiner Documentation.” https://docs.rapidminer.com/latest/studio/operators/modeling/optimization/feature_selection/optimize_selection.html (accessed Jul. 22, 2022).

“T-Test - RapidMiner Documentation.” https://docs.rapidminer.com/latest/studio/operators/validation/performance/significance_tests/t_test.html (accessed Jul. 23, 2022).

O. Nurdiawan, D. A. Kurnia, D. Solihudin, T. Hartati, and T. Suprapti, “Comparison of the K-Nearest Neighbor algorithm and the decision tree on moisture classification,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1088, no. 1, p. 012031, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/1088/1/012031.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Komparasi Algoritma Klasifikasi Data Mining Menggunakan Optimize Selection untuk Peminatan Program Studi

Dimensions Badge
Article History
Submitted: 2022-08-21
Published: 2022-09-22
Abstract View: 1103 times
PDF Download: 763 times
How to Cite
Anam, K., Nurhakim, B., & Juliane, C. (2022). Komparasi Algoritma Klasifikasi Data Mining Menggunakan Optimize Selection untuk Peminatan Program Studi. Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS), 4(2), 606-613. https://doi.org/10.47065/bits.v4i2.2160
Section
Articles