Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Biji Kopi Arabika Terbaik Menggunakan Metode SMART


  • Supiyandi Supiyandi * Mail Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Medan, Indonesia
  • Chairul Rizal Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Medan, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Noor Hasan Siregar Universitas Graha Nusantara, Padangsidimpuan, Indonesia
  • Eka Putra Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Medan, Indonesia
  • Rusmin Saragih STMIK KAPUTAMA, Binjai, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: Decision Support System; Coffee Bean; Best; Gayo; SMART

Abstract

Arabica coffee beans are one of the main varieties of coffee beans developed in Indonesia. In making decisions to determine quality Arabica coffee beans, an appropriate system is needed to analyze problems in solving and efficient and accurate data presentation. Therefore, a computer-based system or method is needed to facilitate the selection of the best Arabica coffee beans. This study uses the Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) method. The SMART method is a decision-making method to solve the problem of choosing a multi-objective choice among several criteria, so that later it will be able to produce an effective and efficient analysis. The input criteria that are the priority in selecting the best Arabica coffee beans are aroma with a weight of 25, color with a weight of 25, taste with a weight of 25, dirt content with a weight of 15, and price with a weight of 10. Of the 25 alternatives tested in this system, Gayo Avatara Natural Arabica coffee beans were the best first alternative, followed by Aceh Gayo Wet Hull, Java Ijen Natural, Java Ijen Honey, and Kintamani Natural. This decision support system for selecting the best Arabica coffee beans provides speed, accuracy, and data accuracy in selecting the best Arabica coffee beans which will be used by coffee lovers to provide coffee with a delicious taste. So the results of the decision from 25 types of Arabica coffee, there are 11 types of Arabica coffee with a rating of "Very Good", 10 types of Arabica coffee with a rating of "Good", and 4 types of Arabica coffee with a rating of "Quite Good".

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Mesran, S. D. A. Pardede, A. Harahap, and A. P. U. Siahaan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Peserta Jaminan Kesehatan Masyarakat (Jamkesmas) Menerapkan Metode MOORA,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 16–22, 2018, doi: 10.30865/mib.v2i2.595.

E. R. Onainor, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Berbasis Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Dalam Pemilihan Biji Kopi Berkualitas,” J. Inf. Technol. Comput. Sci., vol. 4, pp. 105–112, 2019.

Supiyandi, R. N. Fuad, E. Hariyanto, and S. Larasati, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Kredit Koperasi Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1132–1139, 2020, doi: 10.30865/mib.v4i4.2367.

D. Siregar et al., “Multi-attribute decision making with VIKOR method for any purpose decision,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2018, vol. 1019, no. 1, p. 12034.

S. Supiyandi, E. Hariyanto, C. Rizal, M. Zen, and S. H. R. Pasaribu, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Kualitas Ayam Petelur Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 256–262, 2022.

Y. Yunida, M. T. Kamaluddin, T. Theodorus, and S. Mangunsong, “Formulasi dan Karakterisasi Nanopartikel Kafein Hasil Isolasi dari Biji Kopi Robusta,” J. Mandala Pharmacon Indones., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 47–59, 2021.

A. Rachmaningtyas, S. T. Winarno, and S. I. Hidayat, “Daya Saing Ekspor Kopi Indonesia di Pasar Internasional,” Agrilan J. Agribisnis Kepul., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 252–266, 2021.

A. C. Sembiring, D. Sitanggang, and N. P. Sinuhaji, “Pemberdayaan Petani Kopi Karo melalui Pengolahan Pasca Panen,” J. Mitra Prima, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 74–79, 2020.

T. Imandasari, A. Wanto, and A. P. Windarto, “Analisis Pengambilan Keputusan dalam Menentukan Mahasiswa PKL Menggunakan Metode Promethee,” J. Ris. Komput., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 234–239, 2018.

K. Safitri, F. T. Waruwu, and M. Mesran, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN KARYAWAN BERPRESTASI DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE ANALYTICAL HIEARARCHY PROCESS (Studi Kasus : PT.Capella Dinamik Nusantara Takengon),” MEDIA Inform. BUDIDARMA, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12–16, 2017, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.30865/mib.v1i1.317.

H. Syahputra, M. Syahrizal, S. Suginam, S. D. Nasution, and B. Purba, “SPK Pemilihan Konten Youtube Layak Tonton Untuk Anak-Anak Menerapkan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS),” Semin. Nas. Teknol. Komput. Sains, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 678–685, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://prosiding.seminar-id.com/index.php/sainteks/article/view/215/210

Mesran, G. Ginting, Suginam, and R. Rahim, “Implementation of Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality ( ELECTRE ) Method in Selecting the Best Lecturer ( Case Study STMIK BUDI DARMA ),” Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. (IJERT, vol. 6, no. 02, pp. 141–144, 2017, [Online]. Available: http://www.ijert.org/view-pdf/16277/implementation-of-elimination-and-choice-expressing-reality-electre-method-in-selecting-the-best-lecturer-case-study-stmik-budi-darma

M. N. H. Siregar, “Implementasi Weight Product Model (Wpm) Dalam Menentukan Pemilihan Sepeda Motor Sport Berbasis Spk,” vol, vol. 4, p. 12, 2017.

C. Rizal, S. R. Siregar, S. Supiyandi, S. Armasari, and A. Karim, “Penerapan Metode Weighted Product (WP) Dalam Keputusan Rekomendasi Pemilihan Manager Penjualan,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 312–316, 2021.

S. Supiyandi et al., “Implementasi Metode Weighted Sum Model Dalam Menentukan Pemilihan Mobil Bekas,” in SENASHTEK: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sosial, Humaniora, dan Teknologi, 2022, pp. 106–111.

V. V. Wang, A. S. Sukamto, and E. E. Pratama, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Mahasiswa Penerima Beasiswa BBP-PPA dengan Metode TOPSIS pada Fakultas Teknik UNTAN,” JUSTIN (Jurnal Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 105–112, 2019.

Y. N. Molo, Y. P. K. Kelen, and Y. O. L. Rema, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Karyawan Baru Dengan Metode Profile Matching Berbasis Website Studi Kasus: PT. NSS Kefamenanu,” J. Tekno Kompak, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 136–148, 2022.

S. R. Andani, “Penerapan Metode SMART dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Penerima Beasiswa Yayasan AMIK Tunas Bangsa,” JUSTIN (Jurnal Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 166–170, 2019.

S. G. Andika, K. Kusnadi, and P. Sokibi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Kegiatan Ekstrakurikuler Untuk Siswa Sma Menggunakan Metode Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (Studi Kasus: Sma Santa Maria Cirebon),” J. Digit, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 59–70, 2020.

M. A. Ramadhan, C. Bella, M. Mustakim, R. Handinata, and A. Niam, “Implementasi Metode SMARTER Untuk Rekomendasi Pemilihan Lokasi Pembangunan Perumahan di Pekanbaru,” J. Ilm. Rekayasa dan Manaj. Sist. Inf., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 42–47, 2018.

N. Shodik, N. Neneng, and I. Ahmad, “Sistem Rekomendasi Pemilihan Smartphone Snapdragon 636 Menggunakan Metode Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (Smart),” J. Nas. Pendidik. Tek. Inform. JANAPATI, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 219–228, 2018.

W. Erawati, “Perancangan Sistem Informasi Penjualan Dengan Pendekatan Metode Waterfall,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2019.

B. T. Hutagalung, E. T. Siregar, and J. H. Lubis, “Penerapan Metode SMART dalam Seleksi Penerima Bantuan Sosial Warga Masyarakat Terdampak COVID-19,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 170, 2021, doi: 10.30865/mib.v5i1.2618


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Biji Kopi Arabika Terbaik Menggunakan Metode SMART

Dimensions Badge
Article History
Submitted: 2022-08-16
Published: 2022-09-26
Abstract View: 154 times
PDF Download: 110 times
How to Cite
Supiyandi, S., Rizal, C., Siregar, M. N. H., Putra, E., & Saragih, R. (2022). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Biji Kopi Arabika Terbaik Menggunakan Metode SMART. Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS), 4(2), 796-802. https://doi.org/10.47065/bits.v4i2.2118
Section
Articles