Pemilihan Staff Pengajar Terbaik dengan Menggunakan Metode Preference Selection Index
-
Muhammad Riki Atsauri
*
Politeknik Negeri Medan, Medan,
Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Selecting the best teaching staff is crucial in the education sector, as it motivates teachers who have educated students and can be recognized for their contributions. However, the data collection process is currently poorly organized, resulting in less than optimal selection of the best teaching staff. Therefore, the author used a decision support system using the Preference Selection Index (PSI) method to calculate competency scores for each teaching staff member and to rank them accordingly. The PSI method does not require relative importance between attributes. This method is used when determining relative importance between attributes is problematic. A decision support system implementing the PSI method is expected to assist in selecting the best teaching staff. This research can assist in making decisions regarding the selection of the best teaching staff accurately, effectively, and in a structured manner. The results of the study in determining the best teaching staff resulted in the best alternative, A3, with a score of 1.0000, thus being the best teaching staff member.
References
H. Al, K. Aidilof, and A. I. Nasution, “PENINGKATAN PRESTASI AKADEMIK MENGGUNAKAN METODE PREFERENCE SELECTION INDEX,” vol. 16, pp. 198–212, 2022.
A. S. Sinaga, F. Helmiah, and C. Latiffani, “Penerapan Metode Multi Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) Dalam Pemilihan Mekanik Terbaik Sepeda Motor,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i2.2158.
M. Rizki and G. Ginting, “Penerapan Metode Preference Selection Index Dalam Pemilihan Teller Terbaik,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 127–134, 2020.
W. I. Safitri, M. Mesran, and S. Sarwandi, “Penerapan Metode Preference Selection Index (PSI) Dalam Penerimaan Staff IT,” Bull. Informatics Data Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 1, 2022, doi: 10.61944/bids.v1i1.1.
T. Y. Safira and I. P. Sari, “Tingkat Akurasi dalam Analisis Perbandingan Metode Oreste dengan Preference Selection Index (PSI) Menentukan Pestisida Terbaik terhadap Hama Padi Desa Kolam Kecamatan Percut Sei Tuan,” Blend Sains J. Tek., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 237–245, 2025, doi: 10.56211/blendsains.v3i3.669.
J. Philip, M. Musyrífah, M. Muzaki, S. Sulfayanti, and N. Rasjid, “Penerapan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan berbasis Metode Preference Selection Index (PSI) dalam Seleksi Guru Komputer,” J. Eng. Technol. Innov. ( JETI ), vol. 2, no. 02, pp. 63–71, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.ejournal-rmg.org/index.php/JETI/article/view/120
T. Radillah, Fauzansyah, P. P. Widodo, H. Mursalan, and B. P. Putra, “Efektifitas Metode Preference Selection Index (PSI) dalam Menentukan Penyaluran Dana Bantuan Sosial COVID-19 pada Kecamatan Mandau,” J. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1233–1240, 2023, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.2023107083.
A. Tanzil Hasibuan, Tugiono, and M. Yetri, “Penerapan Metode Preference Selection Index (PSI) Dalam Perekrutan Tutor,” J. Sist. Inf. Triguna Dharma (JURSI TGD), vol. 1, pp. 394–404, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://ojs.trigunadharma.ac.id/index.php/jsi
J. Hutagalung, A. Fitri Boy, H. Jaya, and I. Zulkarnain, “Pemberian Beasiswa Kepada Mahasiswa dengan Metode Preference Selection Index (PSI),” J. Sains Komput. Inform. (J-SAKTI, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 648–660, 2022.
N. Nursobah, “Penerapan Metode Preference Selection Index (PSI) Dalam Pemilihan Perguruan Tinggi Swasta Program Studi IT di Provinsi Kalimantan Timur,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 1045, 2021, doi: 10.30865/mib.v5i3.3081.
R. Haris Andri and D. Permana Sitanggang, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan (SPK) Pemilihan Supplier Terbaik Dengan Metode MOORA,” J. Sains Inform. Terap., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 79–84, 2022, doi: 10.62357/jsit.v2i3.181.
B. Hendrik and Ridwan, “Review Metode Sistem Pendukung Keputusan (SPK)Terbaik untuk Seleksi Proposal Penelitian: EvaluasiBerdasarkan Kriteria Efektivitas dan Akurasi,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 6456–6462, 2024.
S. H. Laia, J. Siregar, and R. Siahaan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Media Tanam Terbaik Pada Tanaman Citrus X Sinensis Dengan Metode Psi,” J. Sains dan Teknol. ISTP, vol. 20, no. 02, pp. 177–183, 2024, doi: 10.59637/jsti.v20i02.370.
A. Yudistira, “Analisa Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Penentuan Lokasi Usaha Menggunakan Metode Preference Selection Index (PSI),” J. Ilm. Comput. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 2022, doi: 10.58602/jics.v1i1.4.
Nelly Khairani Daulay, Asep Toyib Hidayat, and Shelfia Shepty, “Penentuan Program Indonesia Pintar (PIP) Pada Siswa Kurang Mampu dengan Metode Preference Selection Index (PSI) Berbasis Web,” Bull. Comput. Sci. Res., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 121–128, 2023, doi: 10.47065/bulletincsr.v4i1.296.
M. H. Devi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekrutmen Pegawai Menggunakan Metode Preference Selection Index (PSI),” vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1447–1455, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i3.2695.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Pemilihan Staff Pengajar Terbaik dengan Menggunakan Metode Preference Selection Index
Pages: 80-87
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Riki Atsauri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
