Studi Komparatif Fungsionalitas, Performance dan User experience pada Website Geopark
- Bambang Wisnuadhi Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia
-
Asri Maspupah
*
Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Bandung,
Indonesia
- Sri Ratna Wulan Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia
- Muhammad Rizqi Sholahuddin Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia
- Siti Dwi Setiarini Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia
- Lukmannul Hakim Firdaus Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia (*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Indonesia has great natural resources. UNESCO recognized at least six geoparks, and Indonesia will continue to develop more geoparks in the future. However, currently, Indonesia's geoparks are not widely known. One of the reasons is that the existing websites do not pay attention to performance guidelines, information, economics, and search engine optimization even though the website is a vital marketing medium so that geoparks can be promoted widely and effectively. A comprehensive study of the website contents is required to build a good geopark website. In addition, it is also necessary to study user experience when visiting web pages. This study aims to find the standard website content on the geopark website and compare existing website performance and user experience. This study compares three geopark websites. The three websites include the Ciletuh-Palabuhanratu, Hongkong geopark, and Cliff of Fundy Geosite website. Three indicators are used: website performance, user experience, and what information should be on the geopark website. These three indicators are essential as an attraction for website visitors so they can enjoy the content of the website and they can stay longer so that the visitors can turn into potential geopark tourists. Good website performance is supported by consistent ease of providing information and speed in providing information to website visitors. In comparison, the user experience visiting the website relates to the interactive visual design, organization, and navigation structure of the website framework and the completeness of the content. We use performance and user experience metrics as evaluation tools for the three selected websites. As a result, the general availability of information is as follows: information about geoparks, UNESCO, list of tourist attractions, activities, itinerary, tourist accommodation, education, contacts, language choices, news articles, pamphlets, maps, and virtual tours. In terms of performance, the three websites have slow speeds, but in cumulative layout shifts, they have good scores.
Downloads
References
H. Hermawan and Y. A. Ghani, “Geowisata : Solusi Pemanfaatan Kekayaan Geologi Yang Berwawasan Lingkungan,” 2018.
A. Yuliana and E. Lisdianto, “Aplikasi Virtual Tour sebagai Media Promosi Objek Wisata di Stone Garden Kabupaten Bandung Barat,” KOPERTIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Informatika dan Komputer , vol. 01, no. 01, pp. 19–24, 2017.
I. Setiawan, “Potensi Destinasi Wisata Di Indonesia Menuju Kemandirian Ekonomi,” 2015.
R. Willy Ananta Permadi, Moh. Sapari Dwi Hadian, Yustikasari, Awaludin Nugraha, and Shandra Rama Panji Wulung, “Inventarisasi Potensi Geowisata Di Provinsi Kalimantan Utara,” Media Bina Ilmiah, vol. 14, no. 4, 2019.
R. Poerwarini, I. Sudarso, and N. Lokajaya, “Strategi Peningkatan Daya Saing Destinasi Wisata Daerah Tertinggal,” in Seminar Nasional IENACO, 2017, pp. 415–427.
K. Saputra1, “Perancangan Sistem Informasi Pariwisata Berbasis Website Sebagai Media Promosi Di Singkawang-Kalimantan Barat,” 2017.
Rika Febriani, “Performa Brosur dan Situs Web Program Wisata Museum Sebagai Media Promosi Destinasi Wisata Museum,” NIRMANA, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 42, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.9744/nirmana.17.1.42-52.
P. Laskar and S. Chakraborty, "Website Evaluation of Central University Libraries: a Comparative Study Between Tripura University and Mizoram University in Terms of Resources and Services," Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), Vol. 6274, 2021.
M. Asri, “Perbandingan kemampuan regression testing tool pada regression test selection: STARTS dan Ekstazi”, Jurnal Teknologi Terapan, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 59–67, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.31884/jtt.v7i1.319.
R. F. Lestari, Aryadita. Himawat, dan T. M. Yusi, “Analisis Perbandingan Website Toko Buku Online Menggunakan Website Usability Evaluation Tool (Studi Pada Bukukita dan Tokopedia),” Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 2604–2613, 2018.
UNESCO, “UNESCO Global Geopark: Celebrating Earth Heritage, Sustaining Local Communities,” 2021. Accessed: Jul. 01, 2022. [Online]. Available: en.unesco.orgsitesdefaultfilesunesco_global_geoparks_-_en.pdf
D. Shrestha, T. Wenan, N. Rajkarnikar, D. Shrestha, and S. R. Jeong, “Study and Evaluation of Tourism Websites based on User Perspective,” Journal of Internet Computing and Services, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 65–82, 2021, doi: 10.7472/jksii.2021.22.4.65.
M. J. Taylor, J. Mcwilliam, H. Forsyth, and S. Wade, “Methodologies and website development: a survey of practice,” in Information and Software Technology, 2022, pp. 381–391. [Online]. Available: www.elsevier.com/locate/infsof
J. Beaird and J. (Web designer) George, The principles of beautiful Web design. 2014.
M. Handijaya Dewantara, “Analisis Dan Pengembangan Situs Resmi Pariwisata Indonesia Dan Sistem Informasi Pendukungnya,” JUMPA, vol. 1, no. 2, 2015, [Online]. Available: www.indonesia.travel
D. Benyon, A. Quigley, B. O’Keefe, and G. Riva, “Presence and digital tourism,” AI and Society, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 521–529, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s00146-013-0493-8.
F. K. K. Putra, P. Saepudin, E. Adriansyah, and I. G. A. W. Adrian, “Digital Tourism: A Content Analysis of West Java Tourism Websites,” Journal of Indonesian Tourism and Development Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 73–84, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.21776/ub.jitode.2018.006.02.02.
Pradeep S and Sharma Y, “A Pragmatic Evaluation of Stress and Performance Testing Technologies for Web Based Applications,” in 2019 Amity International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AICAI), 2019, pp. 399–404.
Google, “Measure page quality.” 2022. Accessed: Jul. 01, 2022. [Online]. Available: Measure page quality
I. Rochmawati, “iwearup.com User Interface Analysis,” VISUALITA, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 31–44, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.33375/vslt.v7i2.1459.
Renderforest Staff, “The 9 Principles of Design and How to Use Them,” Apr. 29, 2019.
Accessed: Jul. 08, 2022. [Online] Available: https://www.renderforest.com/blog/principles-of-design#:~:text=The%20main%20principles%20of%20graphic,space%2C%20unity%2C%20and%20variety (accessed Jul. 13, 2022).
T. W. Edgar and D. O. Manz, “Starting Your Research,” in Research Methods for Cyber Security, Elsevier, pp. 63–92, 2017, doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-805349-2.00003-0.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Studi Komparatif Fungsionalitas, Performance dan User experience pada Website Geopark
Pages: 579-589
Copyright (c) 2022 Bambang Wisnuadhi, Asri Maspupah, Sri Ratna Wulan, Muhammad Rizqi Sholahuddin, Siti Dwi Setiarini, Lukmannul Hakim Firdaus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
