Efektivitas Kebijakan Moneter Non Konvensional pada BPD Indonesia di Masa Pandemi

  • Danang Indrajaya * Mail Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen dan Ilmu Komputer ESQ, Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: Quantitative Easing; Liquidity Ratio; Securities Ratio; Panel Data


This article analyzes the effectiveness of non-conventional monetary policy in Indonesia. The data used is quarterly panel data covering 16 Regional Development Banks (BPD) for 9 quarters from 2019 to 2020. This study analyzes the effectiveness of quantitative easing policies on bank lending channels from monetary policy transmission. This study uses static and dynamic panel data analysis methods, namely the Individual Fixed Effects method, and the Generalized Method of Moments Analysis. The results of this study indicate that the liquidity ratio has a positive but not significant effect on credit growth. Likewise, the effect of the securities ratio is negative but not significant on credit growth. This shows that non-conventional monetary policy in Indonesia is not effective, because banks are still hesitant to channel new loans for fear of increasing non-performing loans


Download data is not yet available.


Bernanke, B., and A. Blinder, 1988. Credit, money and aggregate demand. American Economic Review 78, 435-439.

Bernanke, B., and M. Gertler, 1989. Agency costs, net worth, and business áuctuations. American Economic Review 79, 14-31.

Bernanke, B., Gertler, M., and S. Gilchrist, 1996. The Financial accelerator and the áight to quality. Review of Economics and Statistics 78, 1-15.

Bowman, David, Fang Cai, Sally Davies, and Steven Kamin, S. 2015. Quantitative Easing and Bank Lending: Evidence from Japan. Journal of International Money and Finance (57): 15–30.

Gertler, M., and P. Karadi, 2011. A model of unconventional monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics 58, 17-34.

Kashyap, A., Stein, J., and D. Wilcox, 1993. The monetary transmission mechanism: Evidence from the composition of external Onance. American Economic Review 83, 78-98.

Kiyotaki, N., and J. Moore, 1997. Credit Cycles. Journal of Political Economy 105, 211-248.

Montgomery, Heather; Volz, Ulrich (2019). The Effectiveness of Unconventional Monetary Policy in Japan. Journal of Economic Issues, 53(2), 411–416. doi:10.1080/00213624.2019.1594525

Kashif, Muhammad; Iftikhar, Syed Faizan; Iftikhar, Khurram (2016). Loan growth and bank solvency: evidence from the Pakistani banking sector. Financial Innovation, 2(1), 22–. doi:10.1186/s40854-016-0043-8

Wijayanti, E. and Mardiana, M., 2020. Loan growth and bank profitability of commercial banks in indonesia. AKUNTABEL, 17(1), pp.38-52.

Shahzad, Farrukh; Fareed, Zeeshan; Zulfiqar, Bushra; Habiba, Umme; Ikram, Muhammad (2019). Does abnormal lending behavior increase bank riskiness? Evidence from Turkey. Financial Innovation, 5(1), 37–. doi:10.1186/s40854-019-0152-2

Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Efektivitas Kebijakan Moneter Non Konvensional pada BPD Indonesia di Masa Pandemi

Dimensions Badge
Article History
Submitted: 2021-11-11
Published: 2022-02-25
Abstract View: 599 times
PDF Download: 735 times
How to Cite
Indrajaya, D. (2022). Efektivitas Kebijakan Moneter Non Konvensional pada BPD Indonesia di Masa Pandemi. Ekonomi, Keuangan, Investasi Dan Syariah (EKUITAS), 3(3), 376−379. https://doi.org/10.47065/ekuitas.v3i3.1061