Implementasi Metode Multi Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP) Pada Sistem Penilaian Kinerja Kelurahan di Kecamatan
The Datuk Bandar District Office of Tanjungbalai City annually holds a performance competition between villages to determine the best village by the criteria that have been determined. Selection is carried out through administrative selection, presentation selection, and visit selection, concerning Permendagri number 13 of 2007 concerning guidelines for organizing village and village competitions. For administrative selection, there are already separate rules and systems used to calculate the score of the assessment results. Presentation selection is judged by the mastery of the material, the appearance of giving the material, and the timeliness of the presentation. As for the selection of airy visits, it is assessed from superior products and innovations. So far in the process of assessing the presentation selection and field visit selection at the village competition at the level of the Datuk Bandar District Office of Tanjungbalai City, the assessment team formed by the Tanjungbalai City Datuk Camat still has difficulty in determining the best village performance due to differences of opinion between the assessment team and each other in determining the winner. In addition, the calculation process is still done manually so the calculation results take a long time and the possibility of miscalculation occurs. The results of the village performance competition are considered not objective, it should be worthy of being the best village but not getting it. For this reason, the application of decision support systems is needed to help provide recommendations with more accurate, effective, and efficient results.The method used in this decision support system is MFEP, as an alternative solution for decision-makers to easily determine the village performance competition that deserves the title of the best village based on the weight value obtained in the assessment process. The results of this study, can help in the assessment system of the Village Performance Competition at the Datuk District Office of Tanjungbalai City Where the results of sirantau village as the village with the best performance with a value of 3,765, then sijambi village with a value of 3,471 and johor panti village with a value of 3,412.
D. F. Robial, “Peran Pemerintah Kelurahan Dalam Mewujudkan Kepemerintahan Yang Baik,” Manaj. Ekon., pp. 1–15, 2017.
F. Mulyani, P. Eosina, U. Ibn, K. Bogor, L. K. Kelurahan, and M. Analytical, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Lomba Kinerja Kelurahan Dengan Metode AHP Di Kota Bogor,” 2007.
P. Eosina, S. Suratun, and F. Mulyani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Lomba Kinerja Kelurahan dengan Metode AHP,” Krea-Tif, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 57, 2018, doi: 10.32832/kreatif.v6i1.2177.
S. Vadreas, A. K., Turaina, R., & Ardiansyah, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Penentuan (SPK) Bantuan Dana Pembangunan Rumah Tidak Layak Huni (RTLH) dengan Metode Multi Factor Evoluation Process (MFEP),” TeknoIf, vol. 6, no. 1, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.21063/JTIF.2018.V6.1.18- 23.
S. defit. Norfiansyah, Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2017.
S. Muhidin, A. A., Suseno, E., & Supriyadi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Jurusan dengan Metode Multi Factory Evaluation Process (MFEP) (Studi Kasus: SMK Cibening),” Nuansa Inform., vol. 13, no. 2, 2019, doi: DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/nuansa.v13i2.1947.
M. Ikhlas, F. I. Komputer, B. K. Sawit, and V. Basic, “Penerapan metode mfep (multifactor evaluation process) dalam pengambilan keputusan pemilihan bibit kelapa sawit terbaik,” vol. 19, no. 1, 2019.
N. Cindy Ross and Elly Rahayu., “Implementasi Metode MFEP Untuk Menentukan Penerima Bantuan Pupuk Pada Kelompok Tani,” JUTSI (Jurnal Teknol. dan Sist. Informasi), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 31–38, 2022.
M. T. Indarti et al., “Penerapan Metode Multi Factor Evaluation Process ( MFEP ) Menggunakan Sistem E -Disiplin Penentuan Karyawan Terbaik pada Dinas Sosial di Kota Palembang.”
A. Afrisawati and I. Irianto, “Pemilihan Bibit Ternak Sapi Potong Melalui Kombinasi Metode Ahp Dan Metode Mfep,” JURTEKSI (Jurnal Teknol. dan Sist. Informasi), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 2019, doi: 10.33330/jurteksi.v6i1.392.
D. Nofriansyah and S. Defit, Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Deepublish, 2017.
L. A. Latif, M. Jamil, and S. H. I. Abbas, Buku Ajar: Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Teori dan Implementasi. Deepublish, 2018.
A. Djunaedi, A. Subiyakto, and E. Fetrina, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PENILAIAN KINERJA PEGAWAI (Studi Kasus : PT . PLN (Persero Distribusi Jakarta Raya Area Pondok Gede)),” J. Sist. Inf., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 37–44, 2017.
R. Mahardika, R. Sovia, and S. A. Lusinia, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Penjurusan di SMAN 1 Ampek Angkek Kab. Agam dengan Metode Multifactor Evaluation Process (MFEP),” J. Teknol. Inf. dan Pendidik., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 129–139, 2017.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Implementasi Metode Multi Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP) Pada Sistem Penilaian Kinerja Kelurahan di Kecamatan
Copyright (c) 2022 Beni Harianto Siregar, Fauriatun Helmiah, Wan Mariatul Kifti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).