Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan, Lingkungan Kerja, Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT Mega Trans Medan


  • Endang Haryati Universitas Medan Area, Medan, Indonesia
  • Metya Lutviani * Mail Politeknik LP3I Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Asmaul Husna Politeknik LP3I Medan, Medan, Indonesia
  • Fahmi Sulaiman Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen Sukma, Medan, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: Leadership Style; Work Environment; Physical Work Environment Work Motivation; Performance

Abstract

The company was founded to provide welfare for stakeholders, namely those who are involved in company activities, either directly or indirectly. Those who are prioritized in obtaining welfare for the results provided by the company are shareholders, the board of directors, employees, including the government and the community. This is the main purpose of establishing the company. Companies engaged in any field, including manufacturing companies, trading companies, and service companies, still have the same goal, namely to improve the welfare of stakeholders. Identification of problems, namely (a) Employee performance which has decreased from the last 3 years (b) Lack of employee trust in company leaders as indicated by a lack of employee motivation at work (c) Some employees do not have a strong motivation to get awards or achievements (d) Environment company work that is not good for employees. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of leadership style, work environment and work motivation on the performance of employees of PT. Mega Trans Medan. This research is a quantitative correlational type to see the effect between variables and the research was conducted on several employees by distributing questionnaires. Leadership style has a significance value of 0.000 <0.05 and a t value of 9.9419 > 2.0106, so the conclusion is, Ho is rejected, meaning that there is a significant influence between leadership style and employee performance. The work environment has a significance value of 0.803>0.05 and a t-count value of 0.251 <2.0106, so the conclusion is, Ho is accepted, meaning that there is no significant effect between the work environment and employee performance. Work motivation has a significance value of 0.02 <0.05 and a t value of 2.401 > 2.0106, so the conclusion is, Ho is rejected, meaning that there is a significant influence between work motivation and employee performance. From the results of data processing, obtained a significance value of 0.000 which is smaller than 0.05. From this analysis, Ho is rejected, meaning that there are simultaneously independent variables affecting the dependent variable. To improve employee performance, PT. Trans Mega Medan must improve leadership style, work environment and work motivation. The value of Adjusted R Square in the table above is 0.741 or 74.1%. This condition explains that 74.1% leadership style, work environment and work motivation have a significant effect on employee performance. The remaining 35.9% is influenced by other variables not examined in this study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ayu, D. K., & Sinaulan, H. J. (2018). Pengaruh Insentif dan Disiplin Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan pada PT Bintang Satoe Doea. Ekonomi, 20, 373–383.

Bisri, A., & Wahono, R. S. (2015). Penerapan Adaboost untuk Penyelesaian Ketidakseimbangan Kelas pada Penentuan Kelulusan Mahasiswa dengan Metode Decision Tree. Journal of Intelligent Systems, 1(1), 27–32.

Nurkaydah, F. S. S. (2016). Analisis Tata ruang kantor pada pt. traktor nusantara cabang medan. Jurnal BIS-A: Jurnal Bisnis Administrasi, 5(2), 25–32.

Sanusi, A., Sulaiman, F., Andrysyah, A., Husna, A., & Rianda, S. (2019). The Effect of Implementation Electronic Performance Management (MKE) on Employee Achievement of PT. Indonesia Port I Belawan Branch. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-7-2019.2288639

Sanusi, A., Sulaiman, F., Selviana, N. W., Studi, P., Bisnis, A., Studi, P., Bisnis, A., Studi, P., & Bisnis, A. (2019). Analisis Efisiensi Penggunaan Jam Kerja Karyawan Pada Pt. 1(2), 388–392.

Sulaiman, F. (2017). Desain Produk : Rancangan Tempat Lilin Multifungsi Dengan Pendekatan 7 Langkah Nigel Cross. Teknovasi, 4(1), 32–41.

Weny, Nugroho, N., Anggraini, D., Sofian, & Erwin. (2019). Analisis Pelaksanaan Pelatihan Dan Pendidikan Pada PT. Bimasakti Mahawira Medan. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Komputer & Sains (SAINTEKS), 87–91.

Wibowo, D. H., Arifin, Z., & Sunarti. (2015). Analisis Strategi Pemasaran Untuk Meningkatkan Daya Saing Umkm (Studi pada Batik Diajeng Solo). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB), 29(1), 59–66.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan, Lingkungan Kerja, Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT Mega Trans Medan

Dimensions Badge
Article History
Submitted: 2022-05-13
Published: 2022-05-30
Abstract View: 801 times
PDF Download: 672 times
How to Cite
Haryati, E., Lutviani, M., Husna, A., & Sulaiman, F. (2022). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan, Lingkungan Kerja, Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT Mega Trans Medan. Ekonomi, Keuangan, Investasi Dan Syariah (EKUITAS), 3(4), 809-812. https://doi.org/10.47065/ekuitas.v3i4.1589
Issue
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)